September 02, 2014, 09:02:02 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dstppy

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 60
541
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L [CR2]
« on: June 18, 2012, 02:22:34 PM »
Hope it's smaller than the Nikon version.
For now my Samyang 14mm serves me very well. (Sometimes I can't believe how sharp it is.)
But canon 14-24 will be THE prefect lens to get, assuming the size is not too big.
I've been so disappointed with Canon lately but surely this is a great news.

Is this the same as the $400 Rokinon?  I had one for two days and returned it because it wasn't sharp, even stopped down (I didn't expect much to start with, but even so)

542
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L [CR2]
« on: June 15, 2012, 07:55:18 PM »
You forgot to post the obligatory $1900 price tag :(

This sounds like a very good FF lens and a wicked crop-body lens . . . seriously though, if we're super lucky it'll be $1400

543
Lenses / Re: Looking for EF 24-105 f4L aftermarket replacement...
« on: June 14, 2012, 04:06:49 PM »
I had a EF 24-105mm f/4L on my 5D Mark II, but wasn't happy with the image quality. I had to stop it down to about f/8 in order to get decent sharpness. Wide open, it was pretty soft. I bought it second hand, and may have gotten a bad copy, but it's a story worth telling(?). Sold it (without any complaints) and bought a new Tamron SP 28-75mm f/2.8. Stopped down to f/4, it's as sharp as my copy of the EF 24-105mm at f/8, but at one third of the price. However, it does have a bit slower AF. I would try it out in a store.

I can't help but wonder if it could have benefited from MFA.  I've been meaning to run FoCal over my existing lenses, but so far I've lucked out and had no real issues with my lenses.  Still, I wonder if the 5DmkII would be even more amazing with adjustment.

544
Lenses / Re: Looking for EF 24-105 f4L aftermarket replacement...
« on: June 14, 2012, 01:01:44 PM »
I'm with everyone else in that there's no real 'cheap 24-105'.

Honestly, I think this lens would retail for $1400+ if it came out today and didn't have the benefit of being a high-volume kit lens.

Look at the good non-L zoom lenses, they're basically the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM and the 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM -- neither have a low price tag, and those are EF-S (you mentioned wanting FF as well).

Look at the desirable non-Canon zooms, you have the ultra-wides, which are both non-ef AND not that cheap, and then there's that new Tamron SP 24-70mm Di VC USD, which looks awesome, but we're back at high price.

Honestly, for the range you're not going to find a better deal.

Now, people have mentioned primes, which I'm more and more warming up to as I get better at photography, better images at around half the price.  Do you have access to a possibly loaner 24-105 that you can narrow down what FOV you would favor?

 

545
Please, post your opinion and/or pictures with your 60D.  Especially if its portraits, action shots, or macro.  I'm gonna buy a 60D with the 18-200 lens before the end of June since that's when the rebates stop.  My newborn son is growing fast and I'm missing a lot of memories from a slow p&s.  I really just need reassurance that even if the 60D is 2 years old its still capable of awesome shots!  I really can't afford to wait for a 70D nor afford the price.  I'm just assuming a 70D is coming out and based on the rise in price of the new rebel.  Please help me out!

The 60D is fast enough AF and FPS and it has a lot of really nice features.  No hesitation on recommending it.

The 15-85mm is nice and sharp and fast to focus . . . if I had only one lens to choose on that body, that would be it (my first setup actually), for the second, I'd recommend the 50mm 1.4

50mm is my favorite focal length on a crop body for children that you're around (close enough to supervise them)

546
Lenses / Re: Pancakes in the UK
« on: June 12, 2012, 10:33:06 AM »
Why did I expect to see stacks of flapjacks with fried mars bars on them? :)

547

Ken Rockwell and DxO will review it soon

Ken is behind the game, I would have expected him to have a full review out on Friday!  ;D ;D ;D



Making fun of Ken Rockwell - even though he very well deserves it - doesn't make you look pro. FYI.
i think brian will be the first to admit he's not a pro :P

I dont even look like a pro - good job I wasn't making fun of Ken or DxO then

Wait, who's Ken Rockwell?  <- See, now THAT makes you not look like a pro (Yes, I know who Rockwell is) :D

548
I dunno, it seems like this puts some writing on the wall for the 60D . . . hopefully that writing says "coming soon"?

549
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 01:44:41 PM »
Wow...a very flat, very light normal prime. Such a lens will make carrying and shooting with my forthcoming 1D X like.....carrying and shooting with a 1D X.  Guess I just don't see the point.  Maybe with the new Rebel...

Maybe you can wear it around as a monocle?

Besides, this will be out a full year before the 1Dx hits the street :D

550
What's going on Craig?

Where's the CR?

The new 18-135, do we have any anticipated specs (meaning is it a crappy kit lens, a high quality EF-S lens, or a sub-L 15-85 quality lens that only got boned because it's APS-C)?

Hook us up brother!

If the T4i is good enough, the 60D/7D should be more absurdly out of spec that we get an upgrade . . . or we languish in a void to the specialty market . . . whatever works for Canon.

551
The combustion engine has been around for 100 yrs, but with the advances in other technologies(battery) electric cars are starting to look more and more appealing.

IC is going nowhere any time soon.  Both Subaru and Mazda are going full-on "KISS" and aiming for better gains from conventional wisdom (optimizing, weight reduction etc.) over more complicated models, and Ford is betting big on twin-turbo.

Before SLR goes anywhere, we're going to need to see a consistent lineup of better products from a variety of sources . . .

552
What is the PowerShot S100V, a typo?

Don't see anything about it on their website.

553
Lenses / Re: 70-300L on 5D Mark III
« on: May 30, 2012, 11:34:32 AM »
Is the 70-300mmL worth the extra dough over the standard 70-300mm? Thats the Question... 8)

The Non-L is garbage IMO.  Worst lens purchase I've ever made :(  I've honestly used my 200mm f2.8 more than the 70-300 I have and I've only had it a few months.

IQ was a major letdown.

554
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: It's Not Even April Fools [CR1]
« on: May 29, 2012, 08:41:53 AM »
Hehe never will happen, where will people threaten to go to?  ;D

555
Lenses / Re: Your dream 50mm f/14
« on: May 22, 2012, 11:17:23 PM »
Also, who'd want a 50mm f14?

Lol should be cheap, not a lot of glass. ;)

It's actually going to be internal into the new mirrorless.

It'll make up for digital viewfinders slurping keynoter by being very small ;)

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 60