August 27, 2014, 05:03:00 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dstppy

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 60
556
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T4i/650D Specs [CR2.5]
« on: May 17, 2012, 01:43:40 PM »
Finally, a touchscreen.  Now, all those naysayers can rest easy.   ;)

Yep.  Let's hope it drops calls as well as the other cameras out there too.

I knew VZN was limiting their bandwidth for a reason!

557
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon to Announce 2 Cameras in June [CR2]
« on: May 16, 2012, 11:35:06 AM »
Don't get too excited.
It would take 6 more months to ship. 6 more months to "beta test" among the early adopters.
So we can pretty much ignore this kind of news these days.

 :D That's so cynical I'd +1 you hehe 

Sad, but true; this gave me a good chuckle.

558
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon to Announce 2 Cameras in June [CR2]
« on: May 16, 2012, 09:25:51 AM »
"It's like a million users cried out and were suddenly si . . . well, took to the discussion boards to gripe"

Haven't we had enough of the experimental stuff?  The new rebel will sell super well, which makes sense, but honestly, don't we DESERVE a refreshed 60D/7D?  Say, best features of both, and add DigicV . . . please?

No? Didn't think so.   ;D  If wishes were fishes the sea would be full :)

559
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L Officially Discontinued?
« on: May 15, 2012, 12:41:59 PM »
Crap - I was hoping the Tamron was going to come down in price; can't help having no current competitors  >:(

560
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Tamaron 24-70 f2.8 Review
« on: May 11, 2012, 03:35:02 PM »
;DI purchased the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC on 5/4/12 for $12889.00.
Seems legit to me ::)  $12889.00 for Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC.

That includes tax  ;D

This lens is definitely on my want list.  Nice to know about FOV difference.

561
What exactly do you mean "somewhat" popular? That movie is already at $210 million at the box office after its first weekend and has 93% score on RT.

That would be sarcasm sir. :)

Whoa, I missed it too, and I'm not just a member of the sarcasm club for the internet, I'm the President :D

562
Software & Accessories / Re: Manfrotto Monopod
« on: May 09, 2012, 07:00:00 AM »
I bought a monopod first because it seemed like a good idea, didn't really use it.

Once I got a good (carbon) tripod setup, I figured the monopod wasted money.

Suggestion:  Get a quick-release tripod ring for the 70-200 and leave it mounted --- I've recently found use for the monopod in this way and it keeps it light and usable.

563
Animal Kingdom / Re: Kitty
« on: May 08, 2012, 09:03:17 PM »
"I'm waiting for my milk..."

Fuzzy!

Russian Blue.

August this year, my ex-baby (nyow my sister's baby) will be 20 years old!

564
I dunno what it's called, but there's this green square that works better than the rest.

*ducks*

;D

Seriously though, Av for me most of the time these days.

565
It's great everyone is so supportive of Canon's efforts  ;D

Hrm, is this her or another one?
http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/normal-range/tamron-24-70mm-f2.8-di-vc-for-canon

566
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS 60Da in Stock at B&H
« on: May 02, 2012, 10:48:19 AM »
Well, does it take regular pictures as well as the 60D or is a mod required?

Does it have application beyond astrophotography (artsy IR shots etc)?

If you are good at taking those types of photos and know how to move product, the price tag isn't all that much (compared to everything else Canon announces these days).

567
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Rebel T4i [CR2]
« on: May 01, 2012, 10:28:43 AM »
Excellent.

The 60D and 7D are in NO need of an update.  ::)

If they bring a new sensor out for the 700D then there will be a need for update. The 60D needs updating to bring it back in line the XXD previously were. Was a disappointment for most XXD users. I agree with the 7D but then it would be nice to have a better sensor in it. I would buy it then. No point in buying something new for the IQ to be worse than previous models.

Honestly, a 7D with nothing more than the Digic V would be a notable improvement.  Not 'sell your 7D' improvement, but it would definitely be worth putting out if there was nothing else in the pipes.

From another thread:
Note that there are two 'flavors' - Digic5 and Digic5+.

The new Digic 5 processor is 6X faster and creates 75% less noise than the Digic 4 processor.

Compared with the predecessor, Canon's DIGIC 4 Image Processor, the Dual DIGIC 5+ Image Processor offers approximately 17x faster processing speed, and feature new algorithms that promote greater noise reduction at higher ISOs.

Looking back, they could easily get away with making a 70D that's only improvements were Digic5 and re-adding MFA . . .

568
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Rebel T4i [CR2]
« on: May 01, 2012, 08:53:14 AM »
Excellent.

The 60D and 7D are in NO need of an update.  ::)

569
Lenses / Re: 24-105 - versions?
« on: April 27, 2012, 09:04:16 AM »
If ANYONE is going to know, it's Roger over at LensRentals.

When they sell their stuff, they mention when the date code is 'good'.

That said, I don't recall seeing that comment on any of the 24-105s for sale.

570
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D Mark III Light Leak Resolution (Canon USA)
« on: April 24, 2012, 08:55:19 AM »
BTW my 5D2 is affected as well. Can I send that back?

Me too! I feel ripped off.  All of my lens-cap photos were garbage. I thought I was just bad at taking pictures.

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 60