May 24, 2013, 02:56:17 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rienzphotoz

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 78
31
Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70 2.8 ll or 20-60 2.8 mark 1 ?
« on: May 12, 2013, 07:21:24 AM »
Be glad you are not a Nikon owner, their 70-200 f2.8 is close to a 130mm at closest focus distance! Generally that is yet another metric where Canon outperforms Nikon.
Interesting ... I did not know that ... thanks for sharing.

32
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Samyang 24mm f/3.5 ED Tilt-Shift in Stock
« on: May 12, 2013, 02:16:49 AM »
Just received the Rokinon 24mm Tilt-Shift lens ... this is my first Tilt-Shift lens ever ... anyway here is a quick image made today morning during a minor dust storm ... will try shooting in better locations once the dust storm settles down.
The first image is made with Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC lens set at 24mm f/2.8 ... the second image is with the Rokinon 24mm Tilt-Shift lens set at f/3.5 ... the only edit done to both images is adding Matt Klaskowski's "HDR Look" Preset in Lightroom 5 beta.

33
Just received the Rokinon 24mm Tilt-Shift lens ... this is my first Tilt-Shift lens ever ... anyway here is a quick image made today morning during a minor dust storm ... will try shooting in better locations once the dust storm settles down.
The first image is made with Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC lens set at 24mm f/2.8 ... the second image is with the Rokinon 24mm Tilt-Shift lens set at f/3.5 ... the only edit done to both images is adding Matt Klaskowski's "HDR Look" Preset in Lightroom 5 beta.

34
Site Information / Re: Membership Approval Now Required
« on: May 10, 2013, 07:11:38 AM »
Fair enough ... but a day for approval? :-\

35
Lenses / Re: Any one ever seen a zoom extender
« on: May 10, 2013, 05:22:53 AM »
Interesting ... I never heard of a zoom extender before, but it would be neat idea if they do produce a good quality zoom extender.

36
Lenses / Re: 17-40 f4 L discontinued???????
« on: May 10, 2013, 05:20:18 AM »
I find that hard to believe.  This lens is a cash cow for Canon.  One of the most popular 'L' series lenses.
+1

37
Animal Kingdom / Re: Wrong Photography Ethics?
« on: May 10, 2013, 04:59:58 AM »
Most of us are not forensic photographers who shoot crime scenes and dead bodies ...

Funny you should mention that as an example of photo purity..... It's also a great example of extreme image manipulation...

I am not a forensic photographer, but I do take a number of inspection and verification photos. Sometimes it takes a lot of image manipulation to be able to see serial numbers and scratches in metal.... Highly doctored can be a good thing.....
Interesting point, I think I understand what you are saying... in fact I too photograph a lot of drill pipes and other equipment related to onshore/offshore drilling rigs which have serial numbers that are really hard to see (due to rust, wear & tear etc) and most of the time I have to mess with the exposure and contrast sliders to make those serial numbers visible in the final image (but for the last 1 year or so I've been using Matt Kloswkowski's HDR presets in lightroom for those kind of images ... it really works well for difficult to see serial numbers, with just 1 click on the preset) ... having said that, when I say "manipulation" I meant adding a new element/subject to the image which wasn't even there in the first place e.g. adding a lightning bolt, rainbow, tree, few extra clouds etc in PP, in fact I use green screen quite a bit for our rig models and composite them with images of the sea ... those images are used on our company brochure, newsletters, presentations etc ... whereas for a forensic photographer that would be a punishable crime, let alone unethical ... but as a hobbyist photographer, I would have no qualms in introducing a new subject (which wasn't in the original photo) into my post processed image.

38
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: iPhone5 or 1Dx
« on: May 10, 2013, 04:34:25 AM »
The reception on the 1dx is terrible. Can't get a signal anywhere.  Could find only 1app. The screen isn't retina and isn't gorilla glass.  No WiFi either.
;D ;D ;D

39
Animal Kingdom / Re: Wrong Photography Ethics?
« on: May 09, 2013, 06:34:13 PM »
Most of us are not forensic photographers who shoot crime scenes and dead bodies ... photography for me is a passionate hobby and an art form ... I'm no good at drawing or painting or sculpting  ... the closest I can hope to get to any decent art form is making images and manipulating them the way I like ... I am happy to manipulate and change images so they are pleasing and/or compelling to look at ... even if it mans adding a lighting bolt or removing an ugly wire or add an extra cheetah or make a fat person look a little slimmer (in fact I routinely use liquify tool to make people, with a big paunch, look a little slimmer) and as a photographer it gives me great joy to see people feel good about themselves when they look at the images I've manipulated ... I don't give a damn if the so called "purists" think it is unethical ... I thank God everyday that photography is my hobby and that it gives me a chance to look for beauty in the world around me and if I can't see it, I'll just manipulate that scene in photoshop, and I don't need to worry about being unethical coz I am not a forensic photographer shooting crime scenes and dead bodies.

40
Animal Kingdom / Re: Wrong Photography Ethics?
« on: May 09, 2013, 03:29:51 PM »
As long as the photographer is not entering a competition and not breaking its rules, to me it doesn't matter what the photographer does with the image, it is his image, his vision  ...as far as I'm concerned he can remove/add whatever he wants. Those who are capable of making awesome changes/modifications will continue to do so while those who are incapable will continue to crib that it is unethical.

41
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Color Bombs Kill Cameras
« on: May 09, 2013, 03:27:00 AM »
Useful information ... thanks for posting.

42
PowerShot / Re: A New Large Sensor PowerShot Coming [CR1]
« on: May 09, 2013, 03:14:33 AM »
Sounds to me like Canon is in Panic Mode. Lots of new cameras No-One is asking for. First the lack-luster M without an EVF,  and now an APS-C Super Zoom (without an EVF). Keep throwing things at the wall, something will stick ... Yeah Right!!
::)

43
Lenses / Re: Would you rather buy used or refurbished?
« on: May 09, 2013, 03:03:31 AM »
If you had to save some money, would you rather buy used on ebay or Amazon, or would you buy refurbished from canon usa?
I never bought anything used from ebay or Amazon bcoz I prefer to physically test it with my camera before buying a used lens ... I bought a used EF 50 f/1.4 from a local shop who sold it for less than half the price and I still use that lens and it works great). However I have bought refurbished DSLR and lens from Adorama ... so I'd have no hesitation in buying refurbished items from Canon USA.

44


I did this last spring with a rented 5D III and Canon 14L.  Did it last fall with a 5D II and Canon 24L.  Now just did it again with a 6D and Samyang 24(as well as the Samyang 14 and Zeiss 21). 

The 6D is simply a beast with high ISOs and the night sky.  Even more of one than the 5D III was, easily trumping it.  12,800 was not a problem at all.  Quite amazing actually.  10,000 felt like one was starting to push it for the 5D III.  The same feeling probably comes in around 20,000 ISO or so on the 6D.

The Samyang 24 F1.4 was a load better for this than the coma abusive Canon 24L II.  Plenty fine using it at F1.4 for this.  Paired on the 6D it is pretty insane what can be had. 

The Samyang 14 also a lot better for this than the Canon 14L II. 

All images on here just one exposure, so no tracking stuff obviously.  http://www.extremeinstability.com/2013-5-4.htm 

I made a second page with full size crop examples for some 6D high ISO ideas as well as the coma of the 4 lenses.  I could probably add something if something was wanted.  It's clearly not a direct comparison as I never shot with that in mind and had the gear at completely different times.  It is what it is and I'm sure enough to give some an idea what to expect that might help.  http://www.extremeinstability.com/2013-5-4b.htm

AWESOME

45
Lenses / Re: 17-40 f4 L discontinued???????
« on: May 08, 2013, 03:19:31 PM »
Very strange

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 78