May 25, 2013, 09:26:01 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jim Saunders

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: FoCal or LensAlign - Which is better?
« on: April 20, 2013, 06:25:05 AM »
Having used both (for a 5D2) I'll take FoCal any day.

Jim

2
Sports / Re: motorsport photos
« on: April 01, 2013, 03:19:01 PM »
Great shots!

Jim

3
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Yeah, that is the future......
« on: April 01, 2013, 03:11:59 PM »
Metric light, oy!   ;D

Jim

4
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D L Announced, Shipping in May
« on: April 01, 2013, 03:06:19 PM »
This almost makes me want to have one 3d-printed just to see how it feels.  I'm sure Canon could ship something like this easily enough if they thought it was worth it.  Anyway I laughed  :-)

Jim

5
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
« on: March 24, 2013, 01:42:10 AM »
Does anyone have a raw from this lens (preferably wide-open) they could slide me?  I'd like to see what I can do with it in Lightroom before I take up an offer on one.

Jim

6
Lenses / Re: naked eye equivalent?
« on: March 23, 2013, 05:19:44 PM »
You might well hear different but as far as I know 50mm is pretty close to normal human vision.

50mm focal length is 50mm focal length as long as the lens matches the mount on your camera; Your EF 50mm f/1.8 on a Rebel will look like about 80mm because the Rebel has a smaller sensor.  If you have an 18-55 you could set it to 50mm and compare it to the results from your 50mm f/1.4.

Jim

7
Very well done indeed!

Jim

8
Landscape / Re: Around Inari, Finland
« on: February 13, 2013, 11:03:21 PM »
The latter two are remarkable.

9
Thanks for posting this, it looks like a good companion to the manual.

Jim

10
Have you tried opening the same RAW in Lightroom directly?  That seems like a place to start.

Jim


11
Bigger tablet :-P

Seriously though the only thing I'd worry about is the light coming through the window; I have a vaguely similar situation and I have mine covered over to keep the glare down.  I'd rather have light-tight blinds but I don't use the room enough otherwise to justify the expense.

Jim

12
Landscape / Re: Need critique for future improvement
« on: January 21, 2013, 12:39:34 AM »
Those are all pretty good. I'd say keep doing what you're doing.

+1

Jim

13
1D X Sample Images / Re: Rocket Launch shoot with Canon 1dx
« on: January 20, 2013, 06:36:21 PM »
I can't offer any suggestions, but I like it.

Jim

14
Canon General / Re: More Canon Store Information
« on: January 15, 2013, 12:44:03 AM »
Just came from a tour of the Canon store in Calgary. There's no retail sales area as such but you can order online from a desk terminal. It's a nice bright space with lots of nifty little dioramas where you can play hands-on with all the Canon stuff. In all, a cool place to spend a half-hour poking around. Less Apple store than interactive display, though. Not that exciting for pros, maybe, but the great unwashed will have a bit of fun.

Where in the city is it?  I could see making the trip sometime.

Jim

15
Software & Accessories / Re: Flying and foreign hols
« on: December 27, 2012, 05:52:18 AM »
If you can afford a white Canon lens then you really should have a copy of Lightroom; It is worth it for cataloguing all of your images, never mind the lens corrections and noise reduction.

Jim

Pages: [1] 2 3