May 25, 2013, 02:20:52 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pierceography

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 16
31
This would be true had you intended your original response to be humorous, but since there was nothing remotely funny about it, you clearly did not.  Only when the flaws in your pictures/argument were pointed out did you pull out the ol, "lol - just kidding, guys."


This would be true had you actually looked at the images I posted in my response.  You should go and do that now.  The 'banding' I'm pointing out are architectural features, and the 'checkerboard noise' is a patch of floor tiles.  Sheesh.

I guess some people just don't get humor humour funny stuff.


Fair enough... my apologies.  I guess I'm just really sick of this topic.

32
Would you care to try again ?

You've obviously failed to capture a good image of the interior of Selby Abbey.  If only you understood the motive of large DR.  Just look at the vertical and horizontal banding and the checkerboard noise patterns in your shot, both typical of Canon's badly underperforming sensors.


 ;D

I know I'm not American, but if you can allow me to quote a little of your Mark Twain:

' Humour Humor is the greatest thing, the saving thing: the minute it crops up all our irritations and resentments slip away and a sunny spirit takes their place.'

Good 'ol Mark  ;)

This would be true had you intended your original response to be humorous, but since there was nothing remotely funny about it, you clearly did not.  Only when the flaws in your pictures/argument were pointed out did you pull out the ol, "lol - just kidding, guys."

EDIT: Retracting the above statement.  Read it too quickly while at work.

As a whole: we get it.  Nikon DR > Canon DR.  If the only reason I was buying a camera was for DR, then I'd have a D800.  Thankfully, I realize there's far more to photography than DR... which is why I own Canon gear.

33
Lenses / Re: TS-E 17mm or 24mm
« on: April 22, 2013, 02:41:31 PM »
I'm planning on getting a TS lens in the next month or two, and will likely go for the 24mm over the 17.  My reasoning is that on a FF camera, I find the 24mm focal length to be more usable.  While 17mm is pretty wide, it's almost too wide for my tastes.

But it really depends on what you're shooting.  If you're outdoors and have the ability to zoom with your feet (walk), then I would think 24mm would be more usable.  However, if you're doing mostly interior work where space is tight, 17mm would be more ideal.

But as with most things photography, it's entirely based on what (how) you shoot.

34
Oh my...  If it as good as the 35mm 1.4, I could end up replacing all my primes with sigmas. Never in a million years would I imagine that.

HAHA Ramon, your wish came true... chances are, this won't even cost $2700.

Ha, yeah... First thing I thought of when I saw 135mm f/1.8 OS was Ramon.  :-)

35
I just bought my Canon 135mm, so unless the Sigma blows it away, I probably wouldn't immediately upgrade.

I like where Sima is going, but the limited sample size concerns me.  I love my Siggy 35mm, and I really hope they can keep it up.  If Sigma can deliver on another couple lenses, the could really give Canon a run or their money.

Looking forward to seeing what Sima can deliver next.

36
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/


Thanks


No problem.  Lots of useful information up there.  For instance, the 135mm f/2L being introduced in 1996 is pretty interesting.  For such a great performing lens you'd never think it was 17 years old!

38
EOS Bodies / Re: AF improvements in new bodies
« on: April 18, 2013, 09:48:12 PM »
Wait... so this firmware I bought on the Internet to upgrade my Macbook to 64GB of memory, a 2TB solid state drive, and 4k retina display might not work?!?!  LIES!

;-)

39
EOS Bodies / Re: 21mp Sensor in the 7D Mark II? [CR1]
« on: April 18, 2013, 09:42:53 PM »
18 MP. 21 MP. 24 MP. Even 15 MP.  Frankly, I don't especially care.  If it does a full stop or more better in terms of high ISO noise performance for RAW images vs. the 7D, a 7DII will be interesting to me. If not, no interest.

+1

Better high ISO performance is a must.  Usable ISO at and above 3200 is key... I have the ISO max on my 7D set at 1600.  Anything higher I have to render in B&W to be usable.

Things I don't care about: Megapixels, GPS, Wifi, Touchscreen, FPS, AF (current 7D AF and FPS are fine).

Things I do care about: ISO, price.

Otherwise, my current 7D will remain as my backup camera.

40
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC?
« on: April 18, 2013, 09:13:58 AM »
I'm not gonna get too excited for this until we see actual photos and MTF charts.

And it being for crop bodies only is a huge disappointment.  I get that FF lenses are more difficult to engineer, and this is a good start... but I would have loved for this to be a FF lens.

But regardless, kudos to Sigma.  They're clearly stepping their game up of late.

41
Lenses / Re: One lens for vacation
« on: April 17, 2013, 08:06:37 PM »
I'd recommend the 24-70mm f/2.8 II. It covers the range of the 24mm, 35mm, and 50mm and is just as sharp.  For me, the 24-70 range is my focal wheelhouse.

42
Software & Accessories / Re: Looks like we'll actually get it soon!
« on: April 17, 2013, 02:01:42 PM »
Remember that sneak peak feature that Adobe teased us with a while back? The one that made people go: "no way!"?


Well, it's looking a lot like we're finally going to see it in PS CS7


Photoshop Sneak Peek: See What's to Come

Also note the "Adobe Camera Raw Filter" in the menu too.


I would pay for the upgrade the first day it was released if this feature were to be included.

43
Lenses / Re: I have just lost confidence with Canon Rumors & B&H
« on: April 17, 2013, 12:04:57 PM »
I'm with the OP on this one. Yes, prices fluctuate. However, I used to have a wedding anniversary that was the last week of January. I could get a dozen red roses for about $12.  Two weeks later, around Valentine's Day, those same roses were advertised for $18, "on sale" from their regular price of $22.  I called the florist out on it. She explained that as demand goes up, so does the price of their flowers. Understood, but it's deceptive to call the regular price $22, when I was buying them two weeks ago for $12!

So yeah, I get what the OP is saying.

Then in that sense, I might as well create a thread complaining about the sky being blue.  Advertising that an item is "on sale" is basic marketing strategy.  If the consumer feels like they're getting a "deal" they're more likely to buy an item.  (Hence why JC Penny just fired their CEO for his single price strategy, and their sales dropping by an enormous amount)

I fail to see why marketing strategies and basic economics are such hard concepts to grasp -- or more importantly, why people (OP) feel the need to complain about them or place blame on others.

And as for the roses on Valentine's Day comparison -- while you may find that practice deceptive, I almost appreciate it.  If I'm going to buy flowers on Valentine's Day, it's an unwritten rule that they will cost more.  But if I somehow feel (in this case, based on the holiday markup) that I'm getting a better deal, then I walk away a bit happier with a purchase I needed to make.

So if you feel taken advantage of for buying a camera lens when it's first introduced, or an air conditioner in the middle of July, or paper clips during a paper clip shortage, perhaps you should analyze your buying strategy before blaming "the system" of capitalism.  It's functioning just fine.

44
Lenses / Re: I have just lost confidence with Canon Rumors & B&H
« on: April 17, 2013, 09:42:28 AM »
over reacting much?

+1

Those are pretty reasonable deals from arguably the most reputable dealer in the US.  I don't see the harm in reporting decent (albeit not great) deals.  Especially when many of us are always on the lookout for our next piece of glass.

Again, I got the lower price. That is not what this is about.

Good for you.  I got the 85mm f/1.2L II for $1,799 earlier this year, and you don't see me griping about losing confidence in this forum or B&H.  It's economics 101... Prices change on a daily basis.

Again, those are fairly reasonable prices, and I'm glad they were posted.  Be glad you already got a good deal and leave it at that.

Not one single person is listening to what I am saying. I GOT the lower price. My lens was paid for at the lower price & will arrive Thursday. I found it offensive that the price was marked up, hyped as lower, my post pointing this out was blocked. Do you all work for cr rumors & B&H? Or is there someone else that finds raising prices and advertising it as the best deal offensive?

I'm listening to your point entirely, and as I've already asserted, you're overreacting.  In checking B&H's website, the 24-70mm f/2.8 II is $2,049.  Exactly what it was three weeks ago when I purchased it and exactly what you claim to have paid.  But according to your logic, I should be insulted by CR posting a price that isn't lower.  Oh wait, CR didn't post the price for the 24-70mm f/2.8L II.  So what exactly is your complaint?

But I get it... you're one of those entitled folk that thinks CR owes you something for visiting this site.  As neuro has already stated, it would be better for all of us if you would just delete your account instead of whining about marginal (or in this case, non existent) lens sale price differences.

I suggest you do what I did with my 24-70mm ii when I got it: Go out and use it, and quit your complaining.

45
Lenses / Re: I have just lost confidence with Canon Rumors & B&H
« on: April 17, 2013, 01:14:36 AM »
over reacting much?

+1

Those are pretty reasonable deals from arguably the most reputable dealer in the US.  I don't see the harm in reporting decent (albeit not great) deals.  Especially when many of us are always on the lookout for our next piece of glass.

Again, I got the lower price. That is not what this is about.

Good for you.  I got the 85mm f/1.2L II for $1,799 earlier this year, and you don't see me griping about losing confidence in this forum or B&H.  It's economics 101... Prices change on a daily basis.

Again, those are fairly reasonable prices, and I'm glad they were posted.  Be glad you already got a good deal and leave it at that.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 16