September 18, 2014, 01:56:00 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CANONisOK

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9
16
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon 5 Layer UV, IR, RGB Sensor
« on: June 27, 2014, 11:13:43 AM »
ALL YOUR LIGHT ARE BELONG TO ME!
Nice.

17
Lenses / Re: Why do fast primes not have IS?
« on: June 24, 2014, 03:37:46 PM »
+1.......I don't see the point buying f1.2 lens and shoot at f4. On Canon lenses, I like to turn down the dial twice - hit sweet spot everytimes ;)

I see it a different way.  I buy a 1.4 lens, not because I want to shoot at 1.4, but because I want sharp images at 2.8 -- stopped down 2 stops.   That way on those shots when I need to shoot at 1.4, I can, but for most of the shots I can easily shoot stopped down. 

It all depends on what type of photography each photographer does.  Some like to shoot wide open, others like to stop down.  I guess that's why they make changable apertures on lenses.   ;D
If you want sharp pictures at 2.8, you need the 24-70ii or the 70-200ii.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=397&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=4&LensComp=687&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=403&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=5&LensComp=787&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

Just as sharp in center, more corner sharpness, less CA, probably a hair of distortion but that can be fixed in post. And you can change the FL. The right tool for the job.

18
Lenses / Re: Why do fast primes not have IS?
« on: June 24, 2014, 03:16:29 PM »
I'm sure I'll get throttled for this comment but here it goes: typically, I don't stop down my f/1.2 lenses a whole lot. Sort of negates the point of having them. Therefore I tend to use pretty decently fast shutter speeds relative to the focal length. Others may use theirs differently of course.

+1.......I don't see the point buying f1.2 lens and shoot at f4. On Canon lenses, I like to turn down the dial twice - hit sweet spot everytimes ;)
+1. Exactly. If I want something with more DOF, I'll show up with the 24-70ii or the 70-200ii, not a fast prime. There would be more argument for IS in the 24-70ii, as it a slower lens.

19
Lenses / Re: Why do fast primes not have IS?
« on: June 24, 2014, 02:34:32 PM »
I'm sure I'll get throttled for this comment but here it goes: typically, I don't stop down my f/1.2 lenses a whole lot. Sort of negates the point of having them. Therefore I tend to use pretty decently fast shutter speeds relative to the focal length. Others may use theirs differently of course.

20
I call it a marketing success! I, for one, plan to auction off all of my Canon vests and buy new Sony vests!  :P

21
Metal mount! I'll be interested to see the reviews on this one.

22
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Speculation [CR1]
« on: June 18, 2014, 09:38:20 AM »
Correction: This point seems contradictory:
  • Quite high MP count
  • Vastly improved AF performance
  • Greatly improved low light and ISO/noise performance
  • Potentially a different sensor and/or technology than expected
  • Good price point
  • Very close to ‘pro’ classification, but non-compete with flagship such as 1dx
  • Release by Fall season as expected
  • Canon holding back 7Dmk2 for a reason. I suspect 100-400 mk2 announcement, or some other coinciding situation.
One of these kids is doing his own thing...

23
EOS Bodies / Re: More EOS 7D Replacement Buzz Going Around [CR2]
« on: June 09, 2014, 02:32:48 PM »
Kit it with a first-ever L lens in an EF-S mount?  An EF-S 15-50 F/4L IS?  An L-quality update to the 17-55 F/2.8 IS?
An EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 L IS STM? Sounds like a jackalope, but there could be some logic to it. I loved my 17-55mm when I shot APS-C.

24
I'm ready to pay the early adopter penalty. ;) Where do I sign up?!?

25
Lenses / Re: Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC Availability
« on: June 05, 2014, 12:42:23 PM »
I'm guessing this was intended to go here: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=21186.0

I find that sometimes when you are in a thread when you log into the site, it forwards you to the next thread from the login screen rather than returning you to the appropriate thread.
No kidding! Thanks for the heads-up. I've never had it do that before.

And to make this reply on-topic, I've been thinking about selling my 150-600mm that I got back in early February. I really like the range and it's a great lens for the price, but it has really made me even more tempted to spend my money on at least one Canon supertelephoto.

26
Lenses / Re: What was your first L lens?
« on: June 05, 2014, 12:41:47 PM »
I would have though almost everybody would have the same answer as me: the 24-105mm L! I wasn't blown away with it; having used a good 17-55mm on crop for a while before that lens. But my second L: the 70-200mm L ii really showed me the light.

27
This pic was taken by my wife. She's too impatient to worry about nailing focus on a manual lens. Ran it through Nik Analog Efex (toy camera, I think), uploaded to Facebook, downloaded to my phone, uploaded from phone to here. Who knows how the hell it will look here... But it's the thought that counts!

28
Lenses / Re: Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:38:17 PM »
Thanks for all the great information, Mt Spokane! If the process goes smoothly as you say I'm tempted to skip the 300mm and go straight for the 400mm!

29
Lenses / Re: Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:03:03 PM »
First of all, you can buy a new one for just over $6,000.  This is due to the exchange rate of US dollars in Canada.  The lens will have a full North America Canon Warranty, and can be serviced at any US or Canadian service facility.
If you are within driving distance of Canada, you can pick it up.  There is no customs duty.  Its definitely better than a used one for the same price!!  See the note on the CPW page with a link to it.
 
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/03454/Canon-EF-300mm-f2.8L-IS-II-USM-price.html
You did not say if the one you saw was used or refurbished.  Canon gives their refurbished lenses a full 1 year warranty as well as a return for any reason within 2 weeks.  Many stores do not accept returns of used equipment.
 
Canon charges $5839, but they are out of stock right now, after offering 15 or 20% off that price for Mothers Day.  They will be back in stock before long.
Don't pay higher than the Canon price, there refurbs are usually in condition 10, and have that factory warranty.
Also check CPW or signup for a notification for price drops.
Thanks for the replies. I've been signed up for the CPW notifications for a while. They never have the 300mm 2.8 in stock during the sale events. And lately they don't have it in stock at all. Getting it from Canon refurbed during a sale would be my #1 choice.

I've contemplated the Canada option... All the anecdotal stories I've seen online have mentioned NAFTA (no tariffs) on items under certain amounts but they mentioned still needing a customs broker and long wait periods to get their purchases.

Life is tough when you're cheap and impatient!

30
Lenses / Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:45:06 AM »
Anyone had any experience buying through these sources as opposed to craigslist, local shops, etc.?

Several times recently, I've seen an EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM II used (condition: 9) for less than $6000. Just looking for any advice/experience the community might be able to share. I'd like to get a nice discount on an expensive lens, but I don't want to end up regretting it over the long term.

Thanks in advance for any information you all might be able to share.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9