August 23, 2014, 01:24:44 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CANONisOK

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
EOS Bodies / Re: More EOS 7D Replacement Buzz Going Around [CR2]
« on: June 09, 2014, 02:32:48 PM »
Kit it with a first-ever L lens in an EF-S mount?  An EF-S 15-50 F/4L IS?  An L-quality update to the 17-55 F/2.8 IS?
An EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 L IS STM? Sounds like a jackalope, but there could be some logic to it. I loved my 17-55mm when I shot APS-C.

17
I'm ready to pay the early adopter penalty. ;) Where do I sign up?!?

18
Lenses / Re: Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC Availability
« on: June 05, 2014, 12:42:23 PM »
I'm guessing this was intended to go here: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=21186.0

I find that sometimes when you are in a thread when you log into the site, it forwards you to the next thread from the login screen rather than returning you to the appropriate thread.
No kidding! Thanks for the heads-up. I've never had it do that before.

And to make this reply on-topic, I've been thinking about selling my 150-600mm that I got back in early February. I really like the range and it's a great lens for the price, but it has really made me even more tempted to spend my money on at least one Canon supertelephoto.

19
Lenses / Re: What was your first L lens?
« on: June 05, 2014, 12:41:47 PM »
I would have though almost everybody would have the same answer as me: the 24-105mm L! I wasn't blown away with it; having used a good 17-55mm on crop for a while before that lens. But my second L: the 70-200mm L ii really showed me the light.

20
This pic was taken by my wife. She's too impatient to worry about nailing focus on a manual lens. Ran it through Nik Analog Efex (toy camera, I think), uploaded to Facebook, downloaded to my phone, uploaded from phone to here. Who knows how the hell it will look here... But it's the thought that counts!

21
Lenses / Re: Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:38:17 PM »
Thanks for all the great information, Mt Spokane! If the process goes smoothly as you say I'm tempted to skip the 300mm and go straight for the 400mm!

22
Lenses / Re: Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:03:03 PM »
First of all, you can buy a new one for just over $6,000.  This is due to the exchange rate of US dollars in Canada.  The lens will have a full North America Canon Warranty, and can be serviced at any US or Canadian service facility.
If you are within driving distance of Canada, you can pick it up.  There is no customs duty.  Its definitely better than a used one for the same price!!  See the note on the CPW page with a link to it.
 
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/03454/Canon-EF-300mm-f2.8L-IS-II-USM-price.html
You did not say if the one you saw was used or refurbished.  Canon gives their refurbished lenses a full 1 year warranty as well as a return for any reason within 2 weeks.  Many stores do not accept returns of used equipment.
 
Canon charges $5839, but they are out of stock right now, after offering 15 or 20% off that price for Mothers Day.  They will be back in stock before long.
Don't pay higher than the Canon price, there refurbs are usually in condition 10, and have that factory warranty.
Also check CPW or signup for a notification for price drops.
Thanks for the replies. I've been signed up for the CPW notifications for a while. They never have the 300mm 2.8 in stock during the sale events. And lately they don't have it in stock at all. Getting it from Canon refurbed during a sale would be my #1 choice.

I've contemplated the Canada option... All the anecdotal stories I've seen online have mentioned NAFTA (no tariffs) on items under certain amounts but they mentioned still needing a customs broker and long wait periods to get their purchases.

Life is tough when you're cheap and impatient!

23
Lenses / Buying a used lens through Adorama or B&H
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:45:06 AM »
Anyone had any experience buying through these sources as opposed to craigslist, local shops, etc.?

Several times recently, I've seen an EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM II used (condition: 9) for less than $6000. Just looking for any advice/experience the community might be able to share. I'd like to get a nice discount on an expensive lens, but I don't want to end up regretting it over the long term.

Thanks in advance for any information you all might be able to share.

24
EOS Bodies / Re: New DSLR and PowerShots in May [CR2]
« on: May 30, 2014, 09:32:13 AM »
New 5D and 7D should be out today.

I just bought a 5Dmk3.

You're welcome :P
All sarcasm aside, you will not regret it one bit. A fantastic all-purpose camera. And presumably you're getting it while the price is much lower than it has been since launch.

25
Why the 300 f/2.8 II and not the 200-400? I have the previous generation 300 f/2.8 IS and really don't like taking the lens off to put on or take off a TC. I also have a 7D and 5D3 but think it's an excellent pairing.
At the risk of sounding glib by answering the question for Arkarch... I can think of 4,500 reasons why the 300mm f/2.8 ii and not the 200-400mm.  ;)

26
The only brass step-up rings that I know of are the ones from Heliopan -- more expensive then the B+W's, but way cheaper then gear with damaged threads... I've used nothing but the Heliopan's for awhile now, and I honestly can't recall ever having them stick.
Thanks for the recommendation. Now... Off to buy some pricey brass rings! Better safe than sorry!

27
The B+W filters are made of brass, the step up rings are anodized aluminum.
Keep a filter wrench handy ;)
Ruh-roh, Raggy! I guess I've been lucky not to crank down on them whee using them. Thanks for the heads-up!

28
Might just have to get the 16-35/4L IS.  Selling the 16-35/2.8L II would cover the cost.  Less than 15% of my 16-35L shots are wider than f/4, and of those a reasonable fraction are of static subjects where 3-4 stops of IS would be of more benefit than 1 stop of light.  Sharper would be welcome, too. 

Bummer (for me) about the 77mm filter size, as the 24-70/2.8L II and TS-E 24L II both use 82mm, as does the 16-35/2.8L II.  I have the needed filters in 77mm (B+W Käsemann CPL, 10-stop ND, and the Lee WA adapter), it just means carrying them, too.

No, just get a 77 to 82 step up ring and use the 82mm filters you are carrying on the 77mm lens.

Smacks the side of my head.  Already have a 77→82mm ring, actually, and it'll likely go on after the hood just fine.
+1. That's the setup I've been using for a while (82mm expensive filters + step up rings as needed). In fact, I think it was you Neuro who recommended the brass B+W step up rings that I ended up buying and using!

29
EOS Bodies / Re: When Does the Year of the Lens Start?
« on: May 03, 2014, 11:22:52 PM »
My tamron 28-75 took down my 24-105L for RAW sharpness and my tamron 17-50 2.8 took down my 17-40L all-around.
Tamron hit a sweet spot with their new superzoom telephoto. I am surprised as anyone with the 150-600mm. After owning and using it for a couple of months, I decided to sell my 300 f4 L & 100-400 L. The quality and versatility of that zoom is enough to satisfy me until I'm ready to drop some dough on a big white lens. This from someone who's never owned a non-vintage 3rd party lens.

30
Reviews / Re: 35/2 IS Review by Dustin Abbott
« on: April 26, 2014, 10:32:54 AM »
By the way, Canon direct has the 35mm f/2 IS refurbished (with 1 year warranty) for $409 right now. That was enough to get me to finally jump. 3 copies left!!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8