June 20, 2013, 02:56:20 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ablearcher

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
16
Lighting / Re: Paul Buff Cybersync advice
« on: January 31, 2013, 03:21:18 PM »
I'm using 1/200 without any problems, not at full power though (AB800). You can also check with their tech/customer support - they are truly awesome.  I believe it will also depend on how much power of your AB you are using.

17
Another vote for alienbees. No idea what your budget is though. One thing you will need to remember when buying your lights is how you are going to control them. Controlling light in a tight space can be challenging. Speedlights can also be a cheaper option but keep in mind recycle time. Might be a pain for longer sessions. I would stay away from continuous lights. Just my 2c

18
Lenses / Re: Lens Help..EF 28mm f1.8 any good?
« on: January 30, 2013, 11:09:05 AM »
I was always happy with my copy when I used it. Very sharp, light, small. Makes a crop or a ff body more portable and less noticeable. I do have a 35L now, so the 28 does not get as much use anymore. But every time I mount it on a body, I get doubts regarding selling it.  I'm not sure about your application for this lens, but it is a great take-along prime for indoor and poor light shooting.

19
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: Single raw real estate photos
« on: January 29, 2013, 11:55:42 AM »
The interior shots look fine (especially considering this is not a high pay assignment). I would still bring down the vibrance of the outdoor image. Somehow for me this high vibrance and bad patches of grass on the left make the overall impression of an older building. Overall, good job for a quick $$  ;)

20
Street & City / Re: Your best street shots of any kind.
« on: January 22, 2013, 01:31:33 PM »
This was taken at an impromptu demonstration against the British National Party.

I happened to be walking down Glasgow's main shopping area with my camera bag when my attention was taken by some ragtags and bobtails wearing hi-vis vests with the union jack flag on them.

Alarm bells rang and I hung around to see what developed, within 5 minutes there were civilians of all creeds, class, colour and age protesting against these anti-immigration loon-balls, to the point where Police were mobilised for their protection.

I love Glasgow.  It has it's faults, but most of it's people are solid gold, and generally we stand up together against to people like this.

Glasgow was once one of the worlds busiest ports, our ships mobilised world trade, and brought impoverished hungry Irish and persecuted Jews to our city, enriching it's culture, fighting in our Army's, providing both brain and brawn to our industries.  We have a history of acceptance, of refuge.  And thats why we stand up to the BNP, when they attack the Eastern Europeans and Muslims who have made Glasgow their home in more recent years.
Wow! I did not know that about Glasgow! Great! More power to integrated societies.
   Well... the key word here is (quite correctly) "integrated". If only integration was a reality....  Sorry for offtop.

21
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D MKIII - file size and low MPs question
« on: December 05, 2012, 03:26:29 PM »
OK, thanks. I guess my confusion was well justified then  :D

22
EOS Bodies - For Stills / 5D MKIII - file size and low MPs question
« on: December 05, 2012, 12:28:25 PM »
I' just read the following at kenrockwell website and i am confused. I do realize there is an option to shoot at smaller MPs, but I did not know it is beneficial for image quality. Can some of the tech-smart guys here comment on this? Are you guys shooting at lower MPs?

Quote
No one needs 21MP. All it does is slow everything and clog your hard drive.

Try shooting your 5D Mark III at its M (11MP) or S (5MP) settings. If you look at your images at 100%, you'll see that the lower resolution shots are sharper pixel-by-pixel!

When I'm photographing family and friends, I shoot at SMALL JPG. Even SMALL is good enough for great 20x30" prints.

The smaller-sized images out of the 5D Mark III are spectacular. They are much, much sharper and cleaner than images from cameras on which that is their native resolution. When you start with over 20MP, it looks pretty good if you use all those to make 11MP or 5MP.

Why? Because they use less, or no, Bayer interpolation. No digital camera really resolves its rated resolution; they cheat and interpolate up, so at 100% at its rated resolution, no digital camera image is as sharp as a true scan from film.
[/i]

23
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
« on: December 03, 2012, 02:16:37 PM »
Nice stuff infared! Did you go for STALKER theme?  ;)

24
Lenses / Re: Just pulled trigger on 70-200 2.8L IS II USM - NEW - $1625.99
« on: November 27, 2012, 06:59:41 PM »
Wow! What an amazing deal for amazing lens! Congrats!!!

25
Wow, thanks for posting this! This does look like a great deal. And from an authorized dealer! So Cyber Monday does bring us some good deals...

26
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Cyber Monday at B&H Photo, Adorama & Amazon
« on: November 26, 2012, 12:23:49 PM »
I'm at a loss on Canon's MAP program.  If retailers want to discount (or even lose money) on Canon's products as a featured item, what does Canon lose?  This "cyber Monday" is non-existent for Canon.  If they think they're establishing value, anyone buying a "deal" knows what the normal price is - that's the starting point value.
Well, you are not alone. I saved some $$ for the new body hoping to pick up a deal, but there is nothing from the authorized retailers. The sale is not even on the "Meh..." level.  But look at the bright side - the unauthorized retailers are making a killing now. At least someone is benefiting from MAP. They don't even have to go too low with their prices as the authorized dealers can't even come close to compete with them now. So yeah, I donno what Canon is doing, but whatever they are doing - works well for the grey market. I'm not sure how all this is supposed to help and protect "smaller authorized retailers" (I believe this was announced as Canon's logic behind MAP), but hey, what do I know...

27
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body for $2886 Shipped
« on: November 16, 2012, 06:41:23 PM »
MAP made unauthorized sellers extremely happy, no kiddin'.

28
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Surveys for 5D Mark III
« on: November 08, 2012, 03:14:05 PM »
I guess it's Canon sussing out the perception of the competition, but it might give some idea as to the future of the 5D. Make of it what you will.
My sense is that people always want more of everything.  More features, better quality, greater durability, better sealing, faster speeds, etc.  Improving anything requires greater investment by a manufacturer — in employees, research, development, materials, testing, manufacturing, quality controls, etc. — and of course charging accordingly.  But when a manufacturer introduces the improvements that people said they wanted, there is inevitably much complaining — even outrage — about the price.  "How dare they raise the price!?"  It's as if we forget that all of the extra things we ask for actually cost money.

The 5DIII is the perfect example of this.  Canon improved and upgraded just about every detail of the 5DII, as per many photographers' requests.  Then there was no end to complaints about the price.

Following this logic, if Canon (hopefully) continues to make improvements to their DSLRs then in a few years it will be perfectly fine to charge $10K for the next 5D body. Yeah, we get improvements on top of improvements and it is perfectly fine to price them up - new price on top of the old one. I am sure there will still be people with enough cash and professionals who can pay for this cam after one shoot. Great strategy.

To Chuck: I see a reasonable price as a price which can survive for a fair amount of time (like close to a year) and still sell the product without a massive outcry regarding the price and without all the crazy price fluctuations just months after the release. I suppose a $750 discount by an authorized dealer moving over 800 units in just a couple of days does tell us something about the price here. I am not saying Canon needs to follow Nikon in everything, but if you think 5DMKIII exists in a separate universe from D800 (marketwise, at least) then we are probably speaking two different languages. I agree this price topic is already beaten to death and my initial remark on the topic was done mostly as a joke, but hey, what else is as exciting as Canon's prices lately =))

Take it easy guys ;-)

29
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Surveys for 5D Mark III
« on: November 08, 2012, 12:19:01 PM »
How about "A reasonable price"?  ::)

30
Lenses / Re: Opinion: EF 24-70 f/4L IS & EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: November 05, 2012, 11:27:27 AM »
I guess I'll pass with both of these... My 24-105L is my primary workhorse for studio shoots and the extra 35mm saves me a TON of time unless I work with two bodies. On 7D the 24-105 is pretty much everything I need for most of my studio work flow. I would also miss the extra 35mm for my "walk-arounds". I would, however, consider an upgraded MKII of the 24-105L - that would be a logical upgrade (for me). These days 24-105L can be had for less than $800. I wonder what kind of price Canon will put on the new 24-70 to make it attractive.

I'm happy with the 35L I have, so the new 35 2.0 is not really attractive for me... Again, it'll be interesting to see the price tag.

However, if priced right (compared to existing 24-105L and 35L), these two lenses could get a lot of interest from those who are just getting into the L territory along with 6D purchase.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6