April 18, 2014, 12:54:39 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Zv

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 70
106
In europe its stabilizing on 999£ / 1199€. I've seen someone reporting a 949£ price tag, that's a good price.

I'm sure it will go below 900£/1000€ after the first wave of orders have shipped.

It seems unfair for you guys paying in Euros. Big diff between $1000 and €1000.

107
This lens is going to be in short supply and a big seller for a long time. It's appealing for two distinct types of photogs, those like the reviewer that don't primarily use the long lenses and those that do who want a packable alternative.

I think you are probably right.  We saw the warning signs when it  jumped to the top of the best selling charts in Japan.  I think it will take several months before supply stabilizes.  I won't be able to get one for myself (to own) for a while, although I will get another run with a loaner in February.

I find it encouraging that other reviewers are coming to similar conclusions with me.  I think that will help those interested to feel more confident about moving ahead.
I think it has a high probability of getting a price hike, especially if they are selling it at a loss for brand recognition ... seeing how popular this lens turned out to be, in such a short time, I wouldn't be surprised if they raise the price. My ex-boss (who is bringing the lens for me next month) just sent me an email saying that the seller on Amazon (Japan) has changed his shipping time from 1 to 3 months (earlier it was 1 to 2 weeks)  ... so he is now looking for other sellers who can deliver before he leaves from Japan. :'(
My ex-boss just emailed me again a few minutes ago, saying that the price is now JPY 123800 (US$1188) with one week delivery ... earlier it was JPY 107,820 (US$ 1036), but they changed the delivery timing as  1 to 3 months.

That sucks but if your boss converted dollars to yen then he prob got a decent rate and the price is still pretty good. Prices are going up here, the sales tax is going up in April from 5 to 8%, get the lens while you can folks!

108
EOS Bodies / Re: Patents: Canon 85mm f/1.8 IS, 100mm f/2 IS, 135 f/2 IS
« on: January 21, 2014, 11:42:37 PM »
The patent for the 135mm says f/2.8 not f/2
I hope that's not the lens they actually release, although it would save me a ton of money.  Very sad indeed if it turns out to be a f/2.8 lens :'(

That would make a rather pointless addition to the line up when the 70-200LII covers both of those criteria very well (f/2.8 and IS). And assuming it will cost in excess of $1000 there would be very few who would opt for it.

Just a patent mind, and it was filed 18 months ago. The 70-200LII had been selling well in that time. Could affect their final decision on the 135 IS.


109
EOS Bodies / Re: |RUMOR| EOS A1 Coming Feb 9th
« on: January 21, 2014, 09:15:14 PM »
EVEN BETTER: http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/hasselblad-to-launch-50-megapixel-sony-cmos-sensor-based-medium-format-camera/


Better but more expensive. The current Hasselblad 50mp is $26,000!! And that's without a lens!


110
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon naming policy
« on: January 20, 2014, 12:08:52 AM »
I happen to really like Canon's naming scheme. It make logical sense and is easy for me to know which camera someone is talking about and how it fits in to the line up.

Can't say the same for Nikon. I always end up googling it and trying to figure out what the person I'm talking to is going on about! I usually just smile and nod my head and say things like "ah! Yeah that's a nice one!" 

One thing that I wish Canon would abolish is the rebel cameras and their 3 variations - xxxD, txi and kiss xx. It gets a bit confusing. The xxxD is easier to understand.

111
Lenses / Re: 7D user - advice on my best option for a 'go to' lens?
« on: January 19, 2014, 09:35:22 AM »
If you have 1000$ to spend, you can get a 17-55 or a 24-105 and use them for your 7d.

Or you could sell the 7d and buy a 6d & 24-105 kit for more less the same price.

Only advantages of your 7d are speed and better AF. Your current 17-85 is f5.6 at the long end, and the new lens is f4.0. A 6d gives you about 1.5 stops of low light capability and shallow depth of field, and the lens gives you another one at the long end.

if you want to change your 50 1.8 you can replace it by a 85 1.8 for about the same Price, and this one is said to be really good (i dont own it).

The 50 1.8 and 85 1.8 are most certainly NOT the same price!!

112
Lenses / Re: 7D user - advice on my best option for a 'go to' lens?
« on: January 19, 2014, 08:12:27 AM »
Thanks all for the informative responses. I think I'm ready to scratch the idea of the 24-105 (17-55 wins here by something like 15 to 2).

I'll definitely get the 50mm 1.4, because I've loved using my 1.8. If I aim for a really limited set up, does the 17-55 2.8 complement the 50mm 1.4? I'd definitely be open to alternatives, like the 15-85, if it gives my photography more scope?

I think I basically want one of these set ups:

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens
Canon EF 50mm - f/1.4 USM Lens
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Lens?

OR

Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Lens
Canon EF 50mm - f/1.4 USM Lens
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Lens?

How do either of those sound for me? Anything missing?

Thanks a lot people

When I bought my 17-55 I noticed I hardly touched my 50 1.8 anymore. The reason being that the 50 was only really got good around f/2.8 and the 17-55 covered that nicely. I've never owned the 1.4 but from what I hear it's good around f2. Might be worth it just to wait for the Sigma and possibly the Canon update before getting the 50 1.4, and in the meantime use the f1.8. I always ended up choosing f/2.8 with IS over the (soft) f1.8 with no IS but that's just my shooting pref, maybe you're different.

I highly recommend the 70-200 f/4 IS, the image quality is really amazing. Only issue with this on crop is you're limited slightly by the f/4 aperture. If you shoot indoors it can be an issue as you'll end up cranking up the ISO to 3200 and on a 7D things start looking real noisy.

An alternative might be the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC.

113
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon naming policy
« on: January 19, 2014, 05:17:04 AM »
You're bound to run into confusion when you have (a) too many cameras simultaneously on the market, (b) when you release cameras too rapidly. The EOS 100D came out in 2013 ... it's an "entry-level" camera, so the EOS 150D should be here this year, as well as the 750D ... what happens in 2017 (the new 300D) and 2019 (the new 100D or 1000D or 000D)? Plus, eventually the 5D and the 1D series will reach Mark L and even more eventually Mark C level. But before then, there'll be the Mark XXXVIII and, fitting for the 1D series, the Mark XL.

You forgot about the 100D/SL1. What will happen to  the x0D line after the 80D and 90D?

After the 950D the rebels will likely go back to 300 and after the 90D the xxD line will likely go back to 10 but they might not be "D".  Although I am curious as to what the 100D / SL1 will become. Maybe 110D?

114
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon naming policy
« on: January 18, 2014, 08:46:10 PM »
Canon EOS naming scheme on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS#Naming_scheme


Yeah, sorry. Totally don't agree that the 5D line is "prosumer". It is extensively used by literal professionals in the wedding and portraiture arenas. There is no question that the 5D is professional. The 7D, while not as often used by professionals as a primary camera, is frequently used by professionals as a backup. Additionally, the feature set wise, the 7D has the closest featureset to the 1D line.


I have to agree with the manufacturer. I know a lot of pros use the 5D, it is a great camera, but it also extremely popular with consumers, especially here in Asia Pacific, which by definition makes it prosumer. Nothing wrong with that, it is an amazing camera.

As for the OP, I think 7D mark II as a name, works well.


By that logic, the 1DX could be classified 'prosumer'.  There are many people on this board that own the 1DX, but aren't "professional" photographers.  Hell, there are those out there(you know who I'm referring to  ;) ) that classify ALL 35mm cameras as consumer.


The 1 series is the pro body in Canon's line up. The 5 series can't also be pro it can be advanced or prosumer. Maybe the 5D3 is closer to "pro". The article isn't up to date.

Medium format and Large format folk are looking down upon us and laughing as we argue over some numbers! 

115
Software & Accessories / Re: Adobe Lightroom for iPad Coming Soon
« on: January 18, 2014, 08:23:45 PM »
Will it work with RAW, and how to get RAW transferred onto the iPad? 

Importing RAW onto an iPad works the same as importing JPEG.  I assume you'd use the USB or SD card - dock/lightning adapters to connect the camera and import them into LR just like you do with the iOS photo app.

Surprisingly the iPad seems to handle RAW files just fine. I use the USB to lightning cable and then connect the camera directly to the iPad. Upload is simple. No additional codecs or upgrades required (unlike windows) it can display the RAW file as a JPEG preview. The issue will be memory space. Even the 128GB versions will fill up soon so it's really only good for light editing and then transfer the files to your PC / MAC. I've never tried that though but it should be a case of just plug in and drag and drop.

Also the question remains how those files will sync with your existing library? You could have a separate Lightroom mobile catalogue that you click on. Then you could merge or import that catalogue to your existing library? Or will it have some kind of cloud sync?   

116
Dear Friends
After I read this Post , which start by Mr. DaveMiko, The More I read, The More I understand my self----NO, I am not and will not BE THE PRO. As My Understand that " THE PRO buy their equipment as need to serve their Duty/ Functions as they  make their living from the products by that equipment. And the equipments that they buy must in their  budget and made profits for them too.

For me( and Some minority of CR. Members ? ) always buy the new equipment after the company  improve their  new products/ equipment, just  10  cents of It's  better Quality, and WE HAVE A HEART TO SPEND $ 1000 US DOLLARS MORE , for the equipment that  ALMOST THE SAME QUALITY OF OUR OLD EQUIPMENT AND HOPE TO GET BETTER AND SHARPER PHOTOS---YES, We have  90% Pure Heart but only 10% BRAIN, to create our happiness but less money in our pocket.
Just want to have FUN to talk with you.
Have a great weekend.
Surapon

Well said. But I don't mind spending my money on what I want, I know it won't improve my photography. :(

Let's face it for some of us it's just the new toys that make us happy! And it's our humdrum 9-5 office jobs that pay for them!! Haha!  :P


117
Maybe it's just an inherent flaw that we all have as photographers that we are never content with our gear?? We always want what we don't have (that's a normal human trait).

Can anyone really say they have everything they always wanted? Maybe not for long as technology keeps advancing eventually your gear will become outdated.

The best we can hope for is a "for now" satisfaction level. As in I have all the gear I need for now.

Nah, actually that's rubbish I want it all!

118
Software & Accessories / Re: Adobe Lightroom for iPad Coming Soon
« on: January 18, 2014, 09:55:30 AM »
Seems a bit pricey unless we get the full version which I guess might work on the new iPad air but the older versions might struggle. For an app that is a lot. And you have to pay that yearly too. I have an iPad but am not that desperate to have post processing on the go. My iPad is 64GB so if wouldn't even hold a fraction of my library or catalogue anyway. Do they provide some kind of cloud storage to go with it??

Throw in tethered shooting functionality and half the price and it might have a use.

Note Snapseed is free and does a pretty decent job.

119
Lenses / Re: Canon 135mm or Tamron 24-70mm
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:19:41 PM »
2. I can totally get the not-sure-where-to-go-with-my-photography part. Same here. It's not a "real" job but still something I like on the side. And the little income here and there is really more for the satisfaction of it if that makes sense. Weddings? Yeah, they can pay really well comparatively speaking - I hear. Still doesn't interest me. Dealing with crazy mother of brides? Thanks. Been there done that back in the days as a DJ during college.
But if you decide to do so may I ask if you have proper liability insurance etc? If not spend your money maybe on that first before buying another lens...
LOL - no weddings for me, either, and I still don't know what kind of photographer I am, either.  I own a kit that's ideal for event/wedding photography but have little interest in it. I love nature photography.  I sell landscape & wildlife prints, but make most of my photo money shooting architecture & lifestyle stuff.  I love shooting portraits, but never seem to find the time.  I have lights but no studio, and the list goes on...  Someday I'll figure it out.  Until then, I'll just have fun trying to decide what I want to shoot :)

Me too, I dabbled in weddings but I don't see that as something I want to actively pursue. They are good practice though! The planning and execution is one thing but the thinking on your feet part and adapting to the changes part is fun too! Only prob is if you get it wrong it's your ass!

To OP - You need something in the general 24-something range, not only just for weddings but almost every other thing. I would say the Tamron is the best solution for you. Fast and has IS.

Like 7enderbender pointed out having Image Stabilization and a high ISO will take care of low light situations. The fast aperture is not that necessary anymore in my opinion too. My zooms are all f/4 and I prefer them to the 135L for "low light" because of IS. I can't shoot the 135 handheld at 1/60s without IS or tripod. Thus it limits it's usage to shallow dof effect only. And that is where it excels!

I think it's good to build up a zoom trinity first then buy your primes.

120
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
« on: January 17, 2014, 11:16:00 AM »
A follow up to my post from yesterday. According to the info I have, this woman got her first camera in 2012 and she´s shooting with a 135 2L lens. I got my first SLR 39 years ago and I would have been tremendously proud of a portfolio like this. Enjoy!

http://500px.com/ElenaShumilova


No question that those are gorgeous images but there's a lot of post processing involved there.

In this one: http://500px.com/photo/57384990 for example, look at the area that's in focus on the ground between the dog and the child.  Then look at the ground near the child's heels.  It's on the same plane and should be in focus but is blurred.

Again, there's a lot of skill evident on those photos but it's not all "in-camera" skill.


Could be a composite. Two images blended together. I like the moody atmosphere of these shots more than anything. I wish I had mad processing skillz like she does! 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 70