with that tag price of 300 usd.. i'd rather spend a little more and get the tokina 11-16 ( $420)
yeah i know the 10-18 comes with IS.. but still, useless for a wide angle
I love this logic - so you want to pay MORE money for LESS range, a bulkier and heavier lens without IS (which is apparently useless anyway)?
Yeah, I mean like who would ever buy a wide angle lens with IS? Deja-vu ... Didn't we do this when the 24mm f/2.8 IS and 28mm f/2.8 IS were announced? Remind me what 18mm is on a crop?
They scoffed at the notion then but it seems to be selling quite well so it can't be all that useless, can it?
Oh .... and hands up who here would love to have the little EF-M 11-22mm lens? On many peoples wish list, and why is that? Super small compact UWA lens with IS? Oh yes please!