July 28, 2014, 09:26:25 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Zv

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 78
136
Software & Accessories / Re: Adobe Lightroom Mobile Version Official
« on: April 08, 2014, 09:52:42 AM »
I see. It's like that is it? Good news for Creative Cloud subscribers but all the other poor fools are screwed.

Question - if I give in to CC and pay the monthly subscription and later down the line I say "nah, I wanna go back to LR4" could I do that? Not sure how it works.

137
Lenses / Re: Which lense now?
« on: April 08, 2014, 01:05:49 AM »
Isn't lense the British spelling for lens? It could be the old spelling of it and now it's standardized to lens but I swear I've seen it with an e at the end a few times.

I'm from the UK but I've been in Japan so long where they use American English I have forgotten! Sorry. 

Edit - on a side note my number of posts reminds me of a much loved EF-S wide angle LENS! Back on topic boom!

138
Lenses / Re: Which lense now?
« on: April 07, 2014, 07:58:13 AM »
17-55mm is certainly the best standard EF-s lens. Ive had mine for 4 years, I've moved to FF but kept hold of it as it was so good and hoping canon brings out a new APC camera to attach it to to replace the 40D I still have.

Wouldn't that have been the 70D then??  ???

139
Lenses / Re: Which lense now?
« on: April 06, 2014, 09:48:17 PM »
The 17-55 is my recommendation for all purpose zoom lens for the 70D, the constant f/2.8 max aperture and image stabilization make it very versatile. If you're looking to add another prime the 35mm f/2 IS might be ideal for your video needs as it's small and lightweight, perfect if you're walking about through the woods.

I haven't used the Sigma 18-35mm. Sounds like a cool lens for stills, not sure if videographers would make much use of it. Since you need something that is good for both the 17-55 might be the only lens you need. Couple it to the Canon 10-22mm if you need wide angle and you're set.

140
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Lens survey - your favorites, and your most wanted?
« on: April 05, 2014, 11:56:53 AM »
I have the EF-M 22, EF-M 18-55 and the EF 100 Macro L.

I don't want a new lens for the M really. I just want a speed booster. =)

Very tempted to get the new Tamron 150-600, the new Sigma 18-200 and maybe the new Samayang 12mm, but whoever comes out with a mirrorless camera that has full frame and articulated screen with GOOD tethering will win me over for life, so trying to keep the lens purchases to a minimum for now.

If the damn crippled Eos M or even M2 had wired tethering (or the M2 had good wireless tethering) then I would be happy to hold off for even longer. Sigh, dare to dream. Shame on you Canon. =P

Wired tethering to my iPad is all I want. Seems something that can be implemented quite easily via USB cable and app. Someone should find a way to run EOS Utility or something similar on it. I would pay for that.

141
EOS Bodies / Re: Much Ado About Nothing at NAB 2014 From Canon
« on: March 26, 2014, 10:55:20 AM »
I wasn't bothered about NAB or any video announcements but this is getting beyond a joke. Almost April now and nothing but rumors of nothing this year. And when it does finally come we all know deep down it will probably be a powershot or rebel!


142
Lenses / Re: Should I buy the 35L now or wait for the price drop?
« on: March 26, 2014, 02:38:29 AM »
What price drop?

You'll be waiting an eternity.

Buy it now. Use it a lot. Sell it whenever you like and you'll prob get back about 90% of your money if you treat it kindly. Don't know if the Sigma will retain it's value like the 35L.

143
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Lens survey - your favorites, and your most wanted?
« on: March 25, 2014, 11:56:30 AM »
The only native M lens I have is the 22/2 which I absolutely adore due to it's size! I thought about picking up a used 18-55 for cheap but remembered how much I hate varying aperture lenses and 55 f/5.6 is not my cup of tea.

My fave to use though is the FD 50mm f/1.4 S.S.C via FD/M adapter. It's amazing for portraits once you get used to manual focus. At f/2 to f/2.8 things look creamy and delicious. Incredibly this lens was less than $100 on ebay! (Easily the most fun you can have on an EOS M for that price!).

I really want the 11-22 (yeah I know it's a variable aperture but for landscapes and buildings I don't care so much!) as an alternative travel wide angle lens combo. The fact that it's ¥38,000 is delaying that purchase right now! Thinking about the Samyang 12mm f/2 as an alternative if it performs better.

I was thinking today that a dedicated macro lens for the M would be pretty damn awesome. With IS so it could double as a nice little portrait shooter.


144
Lenses / Re: IS Versions of the 50mm, 85mm & 135mm Coming? [CR1]
« on: March 15, 2014, 11:44:05 AM »
Canon have always put two main reasons for putting IS in the lens.

First, the IS is custom made for the specific focal length and lens characteristics.

Second, for optical viewfinders lens based IS steadies the view through the viewfinder, this is not the case with IBIS systems with optical viewfinders, it is true for EVF's though.

Thanks for clarifying. I had forgotton about the second point.

So the IS in the lens is designed to compensate for movement in ways that a sensor just couldn't do? I imagine a sensor can only move in certain ways - for example up down left right and maybe tilt? And maybe not all at the same time right? That would be some clever sensor acrobatics if it could!

The in lens is basically a series of small optical elements that move in response to the way light enters the barrel, right? Meaning there is more than just one thing moving. So is in lens IS more acurate too? And what about Hybrid IS? Could a sensor mimic that too or not?

145
Lenses / Re: IS Versions of the 50mm, 85mm & 135mm Coming? [CR1]
« on: March 14, 2014, 08:26:28 PM »
In Body Image Stabilisation.

Yep and it's not quite as good as an bespoke in lens stabilization...each lens has an optimized IS unit and not a sensor which wobbles

I've been asked which is better but I still can't say for sure because I don't know the mechanism for IBIS. I understand optical IS is better but why exactly? Can anyone help nail it?

146
EOS Bodies / Re: Calumet Photo Files Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
« on: March 14, 2014, 08:21:30 PM »
From the interview of the rental manager "CE" it seems they just didn't have stock in the end and customers left unhappy.

This happened to me recently in another camera store. I went in to use up a gift card balance. Saw a filter I liked (just a clear bog standard plain normal one) and the guy turns around and says they had no stock. That's bread and butter man! A filter!! Come on!

So what did I do? Bought it off amazon $10 cheaper. Do I wanna go back to the camera store? Nope.

I hope the ex employees find good jobs. I can't even imagine the stress they're under right now.

147
Lenses / Re: Do you top your pancake with a filter?
« on: March 07, 2014, 02:53:41 AM »
Are we only talking about the 40mm f/2.8 pancake? I recently bought a filter for the EF M 22mm f/2 lens. The lens cap prodrutes out a bit making it not so pocket friendly so I'm trying a filter on it so it's always ready to shoot. It only adds a few mm more. For pancake protection a filter seems the way to go. Keeps the profile low and protects the front element.

Edit - if I had a 40 mcshorty I'd go capless, hoodless and filterless i.e - bare.

148
Canon General / Re: In need of a "walk around" camera
« on: March 07, 2014, 12:11:13 AM »
My vote is a 7D with a 24-105. You get the durability you need and a comfortable range + a familiar feel and high FPS when needed. The IQ is there provided your not shooting 50% of the time in a dark bar. Put a rapid strap on it and go sans case.

This is an interesting thread in terms of what we think of as a "travel" camera. To me having a 7D and 24-105 I would say that it's not that travel friendly. It's big and heavy plus 24mm isn't wide enough for me. So I'd have to take my 17-40 too. I think there wouldn't be much of a difference in "discreetness" between a 1Dx and 7D. Yes it's smaller but overall they're both bulky. In a dodgy area theives will easily make you out with your 7D. Maybe another DSLR is not the answer. Sounds like OP wants something pocketable.

Either go small or go with what you have. No point in buying something halfway.

149
Canon General / Re: In need of a "walk around" camera
« on: March 06, 2014, 08:45:59 PM »
To OP - if IQ is priority then you might be only left with a few expensive options such as the Sony A7 / A7r  + 24-70 f/4 lens or a Sony RX1.

Moving down a category into APS-C will give you a lot more options such as the excellent Fuji X series cameras or even the Sony a6000 which is coming soon.

If you are prepared to put up with the slow AF of the EOS M it too can provide a cheaper alternative to the above plus you can use some existing glass via adaptor (though for portability you'll want the native M lenses).

Moving one class lower into RX100 territory could be a solution. Looks like a compact camera. Very discreet. Packs a punch.

Then I guess there's mft such as Olympus Pen.

If it was me and I had that budget it would be between an RX1 or X100s. Very simple fixed lens solution with great IQ.

150
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4
« on: March 06, 2014, 10:49:01 AM »
Quote
Despite my "ho hum" review of the 40mm it's kind of grown on me, it's a very capable lens and if you don't have a zoom in that focal range it's a no-brainer as a buy.

I do have the 24-105 f/4 but I don't think I have a single "Wow" picture taken with it. It wasn't till I slapped the 50mm 1.8 on on the 6D and got some "Wow" pictures that I realized how special primes can be. My problem with my 50mm is focus accuracy. It is so unreliable. Bought FoCal Pro and every time I run it with the 1.8, it tells me my predicted adjustment is off the chart. If I force it to continue, I get an adjustment of +16...but I digress.

I am happy to play with and get to know my new 85mm for now but at some point, I really feel the need to replace the my 50mm.

Now you see why they call it the "thrifty fifty"!! At that price there's gotta be some compromise and unfortunately AF accuracy is one of them. Bloody good glass though! It was great on my 550D.

Having recently picked up a used Sigma 50 1.4 I would say it is a great lens for the money but again the AF is a bit of a let down. Nothing even close to a good USM lens. Focus shifts too. But the IQ is very nice. I'm using it for now for non critical stuff and general messing around in the spring.

I would wait a bit before doing any 50 shopping.   

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 78