« on: May 13, 2014, 02:28:18 AM »
but the 135 will be f2.8 an have IS added... sooooo not much point really since the 70-200 f2.8L IS II exists and you already have one don't you?I agree with the rest though. That updated 100-400 was promised to us "after the 200-400 starts shipping in decent numbers." So that was just BS?I'm angling on a revised 135 & 100-400 or 400/5.6.
Gave up on a 35/1.4 as I love my 40/2.8 pancake and and I just do much macro much.
If it was f/2 with IS I would consider it but yeah I don't think it would go down too well if it was f/2.8 and IS. What would even be the point of that unless it was a non L dirt cheap STM plastic mount version.