« on: September 17, 2014, 01:44:37 AM »
Wow some people must have really high expectations from Matt Granger for him to be able to just pick up a camera he's never even seen before or even existed before that point and to then be handed it and given a short (a minute or two?) time to get a 100% hit rate in conditions he has has no control over? Well he didn't manage that so the only conclusion can be - that the camera is a dud? Because MG cannot miss. Ever. It's not even thinkable.
If he's going to pick up a new camera, post pics online to "showcase quality" then he should make the pics worthy of such.
As it is, Matt Granger has posted pictures for click bait and to drive his views up. That's about all that you can say for the images posted.
He posted the pics for review and should have made sure they were ready to be reviewed. He didn't.
Matt Granger is just another click bait fool like Ken Rockwell.
I agree he probably should have known better. I couldn't care less about these sample images. They're just creating more confusion and debate over nothing. The link Steve posted has good samples but I think once the real reviews come in from trusted sources we can start to form our own, (hopefully) more informed opinions.
Until then it's still just a new camera and a spec sheet. I note some that are pre-ordering probably don't give a toss about these sample images and are quite satisfied