August 23, 2014, 01:48:04 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Zv

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 79
211
Software & Accessories / Re: Tripod for someone who's never used one?
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:05:25 AM »
Quote
Thought I'd post what I ended up getting, after considering all the fine advice:

RRS BH-40, with lever release and panning clamp, an RSS L plate, and for the tripod legs I decided to go with carbon fiber, but compromised on the price, since I got the expensive ball head, and went with Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 instead of Gitzo or RSS.

Even though my heaviest lens is only a 24-105mm, I thought I'd go with the BH-40 in case I get heavier lenses in the future and because I wanted the independent drag on the ball head. I went with the panning clamp so I didn't have to worry about leveling the legs first when shooting panoramas. The only thing I didn't get was the nodal slide, but I can always pick that up in the future.

Are you happy with your choices a few months out? Thinking about tripods myself and trying to learn from your research :-)

I recently bought the same combo and it's been amazing so far. The tripod isn't as light as I thought it would be but the extra heft adds some stability. 

212
Lenses / Re: Most Anticipated Rurmored Sigma Lenses?
« on: February 10, 2014, 04:59:04 AM »
An "Art" refresh of the 85/1.4 would be very welcome.

+1 the 85 refresh is on the wish list. I think the most anticipated was the 50 1.4 but that's coming soon so no worries!

I would like to see a wide prime, maybe a 24 1.4 or something. Not sure if that was ever rumored. I also agree we don't need another 24-something. They already made one I can't see them making another one so soon.


213
Canon General / Re: Gear envy
« on: February 09, 2014, 05:30:10 PM »
I wonder why they bothered with the 5ds. Why not just have one model to track?  Does the 5d do something the 1D doesn't?

I was thinking the same. Perhaps the size difference is an advantage in certain situations? Perhaps as a 2nd body or back up?

214
EOS Bodies / Re: Repair or replace 7D
« on: February 09, 2014, 02:10:19 AM »
Also the touchscreen and  liveview focusing will benefit your macro work.

Nice features, but imho not useful for macro. For non-handheld macro, you're much better of with manual focus & Magic Lantern's focus peaking (and stacking of course). The dof is so thin that tipping the touchscreen with your finger will hardly do the trick, and this is the one situation where speed doesn't matter so the faster lv focusing doesn't help much.

Sorry, where did the OP mention handheld macro shooting? I was under the impression that it would have been using a tripod. I'm sure the OP does at least some tripod work so in those cases the flippy up screen, wifi and touchscreen could all benefit him.

And the OP also mentioned he wanted a higher fps camera, for whatever reason. That was my reasoning behind a 70D. Otherwise yeah I think any crop sensor camera would work.

But then again, he lives in a humid or tropical environment and needs the weathersealing. A rebel isn't going to cut it. And after owning a 7D, trust me you do not wanna go back to a rebel!

OP could get a refurbished 7D but I don't know if thats an option.

215
EOS Bodies / Re: Repair or replace 7D
« on: February 08, 2014, 10:14:44 PM »
Don't waste money on expensive repairs. Ditch it and go for a 70D. You'll be getting an updated camera with similar features and only slightly lower fps. Also the touchscreen and  liveview focusing will benefit your macro work. The 7D is a great camera but lets face it, it's getting old now.

Sell the 7D for parts on ebay. Also see if Canon will take it off your hands.

216
Third Party Lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) / Re: Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC
« on: February 08, 2014, 08:20:19 PM »
From a recent trip to Kuala Lumpur.

That top shot is really killer.  Fabulous work!

Thanks Dustin, your advice regarding manual focusing on this thread was extremely useful!

217
Third Party Lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) / Re: Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC
« on: February 08, 2014, 11:40:06 AM »
From a recent trip to Kuala Lumpur.

Great shots. Nicely done Zv.

Thanks! I am lovin this lens. Glad I took it to Malaysia, if only for the towers!

218
Canon General / Re: Gear envy
« on: February 08, 2014, 11:30:47 AM »
The most surprising thing for me is the presence of 7 pieces of the 8-15mm fisheye. Is it really that useful in that scenario?

Yes, prob for the "from below" shots of ski jumping. Also the tight spaces and maybe bob sleigh. Actually I can think of loads of uses.

219
EOS-M / Re: FD lenses
« on: February 08, 2014, 08:15:13 AM »
I was wondering if there are any affordable but 'outstanding', 'good' or simply 'fun' FD(n) or FL lenses that you would recommend to use on a mirrorless camera like the EOS-M or Sony NEX that I own.

I have an FD adapter and tried the FDn 70-210mm f/4 on my NEX but the lens's performance was poor with lots of purple fringing. I sold it and now bought a Canon FD 200mm f/4 S.S.C.  that I have better hopes for.

Other old stuff I own:

Vivitar C/FD 28mm f/2.8 Auto Wide Angle
FDn 28mm f/2.8
FL50mm f/1.8 II
FDn 50mm f/1.8
FL 135mm f/2.5 (haven't tried this yet but should be fun)

What's your experience with adapted FD lenses?

I haven't used them much but I've got a FD 50mm f/1.4 S.S.C and a FD 100mm f/2.8 S.S.C that I bought off ebay to use specifically with the EOS M. I'm using a Fotasy adapter and it's doing a pretty decent job. I mucked up at the beginning as I didn't mount the lens properly and the lens was stuck at f/1.4 (I also failed to notice this until later so all my shots were a bit soft). However, even when I shot wide open the images came out quite good, better than I expected. I think it would be cool to try some portraits with it. It has a kind of dreamy quality that is unique.

The 100mm seems sharper wide open but I only played with it a little around my living room. Still need to test that out properly. I like the reach ( ~ 160mm) you get for the extremely small size this combo gives. Good for snapping candids!

I use Magic Lantern to help with focusing but even without it I'm getting better at manual focus that its not that much of an issue.

I don't know if Canon will ever decide to release a AF tele lens for the M mount so until then I'll make do with these two lenses.

220
Third Party Lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) / Re: Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC
« on: February 08, 2014, 06:55:27 AM »
From a recent trip to Kuala Lumpur.


221
Lighting / Re: 600EX-RT Manual Question
« on: February 08, 2014, 12:55:01 AM »
Steven,

You are making far more work out of this than it is.

First, you cannot use ETTL, it just is not what ETTL is designed for. Second, taking just the small highlighted section illuminated by the hand held 600 has masses of exposure latitude because of the way you can adjust the exposure and then blend it. That is why nobody I know brackets the in hand flash, just know that you get the rough exposure you want of anything at a certain distance; I know f8 and 10 feet @ half power gives me a second story burst, at 20 feet it is a ground floor burst.

Myself, and everybody who I know that does this, just uses manual flash mode and pops away, if you don't have the remote viewing capability just keep varying your flash to subject distance, zoom setting, and angles.

But, because this question has been bugging me and you clearly don't want to go the ND filter gel route I have come up with a work around using just the 600's.

First, put the on camera unit (ST-E3-RT or 600-EX-RT) in Group mode, second, set each group to M and a different setting such that you would want to bracket, third, set the in hand flash to Group A, take the shot with the REL option. Then change the in hand flash to the next Group B, take a shot, then change the in hand flash to the next Group C, take the shot etc etc. This will give you five different exposures from the in hand flash.

This a pure genius solution. It's so simple!

222
Photography Technique / Re: Photography fail moments !!!
« on: February 08, 2014, 12:37:44 AM »
This used to happen with my 7D -

I would bring the viewfinder close to my eye and as I half press the shutter, the built in flash pops up and whacks me in the face. I hadn't realized the mode dial had sneakily shifted to the green box. Now I see the advantage of a locking mode dial!

223
Photography Technique / Re: Photography fail moments !!!
« on: February 07, 2014, 02:04:02 AM »
I'm sure everyone has left the self timer on there camera and forgot about it until they next used the camera. Generally resulting in a frustrating few moments of waiting for it to fire while you scream in your head that the must capture moment is about to disappear.

Guilty of the lens cap one too. I took a fantastic 15 minute exposure of the inside of a lens cap once  :-[

This one!! Every time! That horrible feeling when you press the shutter only to hear "beep-beep-beep-beep-beep-beep-b-b-b-b-b-b click". I usually wait it out and try and use that shot as a test shot. But inside I'm secretly screaming "you twat!" 

 ;D

224
Lenses / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art Price leaked
« on: February 07, 2014, 01:28:35 AM »
Can't wait.  Have the Sigma 35 Art love it.  Refresh Canon Rumors everyday at least 5 times waiting to pre order.  1300 is more than I thought but will not stop me from pre ordering. Worst case its not worth it and send it back. Best case finally have and auto focus 50 prime better than my 24-70 II.

Haha that's a good point you've hit upon! Canon's best 50mm is the 24-70LII, as long as you don't need wider than f/2.8 it would make more sense to put that $1300 towards that. With a good rebate deal it was under $1800 wasn't it?


225
Lenses / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art Price leaked
« on: February 06, 2014, 08:12:38 PM »
It's an estimated price. The actual price is still TBA. Let's not get our neckstraps in a twist over this rumor just yet!

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 79