Thus you are lucky man not seeing the difference of 85,135,200 vs 70-200 - all @ 2.8 and your bag can be pretty light.Do you care about IQ?
Without reading the review, just give me this lens and 24-70 f2.8 II on FF...........I'm done
No need to carry: 24L, 35L, 50L, 85L, 135L, and 200L
70-200 II is not able to replace 85/135/200Ls in many situations...
I wouldn't spend my money on 24-70 f2.8 II & 70-200 f2.8 IS II, if IQ is not important in photography.
But I can clearly see that zoom @ F3.5-4+ can match (contrast + sharpness) the prime @ F2.8, but @ F3.5-4 there is less subject/background separation, thus If I want best IQ, I take only 24-70 II + longer primes.
(BTW: 24-70 II is nothing special till F3.5-4 too.)