| 2436759.jpg |
1199 |
Re: Canon 35 2.0 IS vs Sigma 35 1.4 |
February 22, 2013, 10:30:52 PM |
| 2250339.jpg |
1197 |
Re: 85 1.2 L2 not sharp at 1.2 |
October 23, 2012, 06:34:12 PM |
| 2438643.jpg |
1170 |
Re: Canon 35 2.0 IS vs Sigma 35 1.4 |
February 22, 2013, 10:30:52 PM |
| 200168.jpg |
1162 |
Re: 85 1.2 L2 not sharp at 1.2 |
October 23, 2012, 06:34:12 PM |
| 2436758.jpg |
1156 |
Re: Canon 35 2.0 IS vs Sigma 35 1.4 |
February 22, 2013, 10:30:52 PM |
| mk III 85 f12 biff 1_cr.jpg |
1144 |
Re: 85 1.2 L2 not sharp at 1.2 |
October 23, 2012, 06:34:12 PM |
| 200167.jpg |
1143 |
Re: 85 1.2 L2 not sharp at 1.2 |
October 23, 2012, 06:34:12 PM |
| 2438644.jpg |
1143 |
Re: Canon 35 2.0 IS vs Sigma 35 1.4 |
February 22, 2013, 10:30:52 PM |
| Image01.jpg |
820 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:26:32 PM |
| Image02.jpg |
818 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:26:32 PM |
| Image03.jpg |
817 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:26:32 PM |
| Image09.jpg |
817 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:32:00 PM |
| Image04.jpg |
811 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:26:32 PM |
| Image10.jpg |
795 |
Re: 35L or 50L? |
March 18, 2013, 08:32:00 PM |
| strip1.jpg |
737 |
Re: Visualising focal length perception. |
November 28, 2012, 01:46:47 PM |