Still no correction of the incorrect IS information though.........
Do a Google search of the lens + Hybrid IS and see what you find. I understand what you are saying and it isn't a Hybrid IS system in the sense of the system on the 100L, but most review sources refer to the IS system in the lens as "Hybrid". From FredMiranda, for example:
"The EF 35mm f/2.0 IS USM Standard Prime Lens from Canon adds hybrid Image Stabilization (IS) to a rear focusing system and ring-type Ultra Sonic Motor (USM) for not only quick and quiet autofocus, but steadier shots in low-light conditions. Optimized lens coatings help ensure exceptional color balance while minimizing ghosting, and full-time access to manual focus is provided while in autofocus (AF) mode allowing you to quickly switch between the two as you need them."
I don't know why you are making such an issue of this, but hopefully this will help...
First, I don't see that mentioning it twice is "making such an issue".
Second, why do a Google search? Copy and pasting something that is wrong does not make it right. More confusing for many, Canon actually have a feature called Hybrid IS, but it is not on this lens.
Why not just look at the Canon press release? "Canon Standard Prime Lens with Optical Image Stabilizer: EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Lens"
The manual: You can use the Image Stabilizer in AF or MF mode
The Spec sheet: OIS box
I appreciate you are brand building, however propagating erroneous information is not a brand I would expect you to want.
The fact that you also misrepresented what the IS actually does in panning mode is also frustrating. Your reviews are very nice, your supporting images a very welcome break from the usual journalist churn it out rubbish that is so common. You know how to take a photo and you actually use the gear to its potential rather than write about what you are given with no enthusiasm or knowledge in the hopes of a promotion to the motoring division of a big publishing house.
That I am asking for simple errors to be corrected shouldn't be seen as a negative, I am trying to help and make your branding authoritative.
Thank you for explaining where you are coming from. I can now appreciate what you are trying to say. There are a few posters on this site that seem to love to attack me regardless of what I write. I will further investigate both of your points and make changes if warranted.