January 31, 2015, 11:24:16 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TWI by Dustin Abbott

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 115
91
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Announces CN20x50 Cine-Servo Ultra Zoom Lens
« on: October 16, 2014, 10:12:01 AM »
Sounds amazing...but I can only image what this puppy is going to cost.  More than my car, I suspect.

92
Probably a few of you have visited my site before to read reviews, but anyway:  www.dustinabbott.net.  There are plenty of links there that lead to the other places my work is shared.

93
Reviews / Re: Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC Review (EOS M and NEX)
« on: October 10, 2014, 11:32:59 AM »
Thanks for the review, Dustin!  It would be nice to see a comparison versus the EF-M 55-200 if you get the chance.  Granted it's not sold natively in the US, but sourcing it from Canada is easy enough.  It is interesting how quickly the Tamron gets to f/5.6 (near 50mm) and see how that stacks up against Canon's 55-200.  Given how small the EF-M 18-55 is, carrying an extra lens for the M system is not as large a penalty compared to FF.

I tried to get Henry's in Canada to send me one.  I have written an article for them before, but they have had a big turnover and the new contact that "my guy" got me never returned my email.  I agree completely that this is the logical comparison, though.  If status quo ever changes with Henry's I'll definitely do a comparison.

94
EOS-M / Posted: Tamron 18-200mm VC for EOS M Review
« on: October 10, 2014, 09:58:32 AM »
Hello all.  This is a very interesting option for M owners because it provides both reasonable tele performance along with a truly all-in-one solution that is very portable (though the lens is on the large side for an EOS M).

The review post/links are here:  http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=23194.0

There is a written review, video review, and image gallery with some full size samples.

You can also go straight to the review site that has all of those links: 
http://dustinabbott.net/2014/10/tamron-18-200mm-vc-review/

P.S.  I will be going live with the Rokinon 12mm f/2 lens in the next week or so.  #catoutofthebag - I liked it so much that I bought it and added it to my kit.

95
Reviews / Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III VC Review (EOS M and NEX)
« on: October 10, 2014, 09:52:57 AM »
Here is a new review of the Tamron 18-200 VC for mirrorless bodies.  I was pretty impressed with this lens other than the fact that it is a bit on the large side for the tiny bodies it is mounting too.  I’ve done both a written review:

http://dustinabbott.net/2014/10/tamron-18-200mm-vc-review/

A video review:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExA7Nlza7Gk

And a lens image gallery with some samples/full size images for download:

http://dustinabbott.net/2014/10/tamron-18-200vc-lens-gallery/

For those of you with either an M or a NEX, this is a pretty compelling choice because the IQ is very good.  It makes for a really convenient all in one package or something to bring along to compliment a more focused DSLR setup (with primes, etc...)

The Moira River by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

96
Dustin, very effective use of the 14mm FL, nice compositions. Thanks for sharing. I find 14 mm challenging on FF cameras.

Filters are very expensive.  I actually enjoying using the 14mm focal length as I find it very dramatic.  It does require a completely different way of thinking in composition, though.

P.S. Everyone:  I was out in the field with Camdiox filter.  Unlike the homemade solid ND filter I made (using LEE film), the Camdiox combined with the Samyang/Cokin ND grad produced a magenta cast.  Bummer.  It seems to be fine on it's own, but I really got it mostly to use in combination with the ND grad.  Something doesn't agree there.

97
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM
« on: October 09, 2014, 10:56:19 AM »
This lens remains one of my absolute favorites.  It doubles as a relatively easy to pack along, super sturdy landscape lens:

Valley of Autumn by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

It's color reproduction always impresses...

98
Always hitting us with really good (and much needed) reviews, thank you for that!

And awesome tie :P

Thanks!  Here's one more example:  I did the light painting and everything in a single frame - this is unedited, SOOC.  It can really produce dynamic images.

Rain Keeps Fallin' on My Head by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

99
Thanks for the review, Dustin. :)

I'm on the market for a wide angle landscape lens that could double as an astro/starscape lens, and this filter holder would make the Samyang 14/2.8 a great candidate for it. Do you have any info about the pricing? I saw some for sale in Italy on ebay at 229€, which i think is just too much for just the filter holder.

Wow - that price is way too high for just the filter holder.  If you are in Italy, you might want to consider taking a look at the UK site - http://www.samyang-lens.co.uk/samyang-sfh-14-filter-holder.html.  It is under 30 pounds for the filter holder.  This is the solid ND filter that I just got for the system:  http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Camdiox-165mm-Neutral-Density-ND8-Filter-3-stops-for-Samyang-160-Hitech-Lee-165-/400777816095?pt=Camera_Filters&hash=item5d5038281f.  I see from the box that they also make a ND16 (which might be even more valuable), but I haven't see one on Ebay yet. 

Distribution is really weak for this system, but it is very effective.  The ND grad is the single biggest deal to me.  Here's another single frame shot that I just took with the system that I have literally given only a one click processing to up the contrast and saturation a bit.

100
Here's another example from this setup.  I was able to get a nice ND8 solid grad filter for the system from Camdiox off of Ebay.  Anyway, these tools make this lens even more dynamic:

Driftwood by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

101
Animal Kingdom / Re: Portrait of your "Best friend"
« on: October 03, 2014, 07:51:42 PM »
(doleful)

Hard to resist those eyes!


+1
beautiful
Yup! Lovely shot Dustin. The trouble is they do not stay this size for long...

Thanks, all.  She's actually about 9 months old, so won't get a whole lot bigger.  She weighs about 18 pounds.

102
Those are some lovely images, Eldar. Thanks for sharing!

103
Animal Kingdom / Re: Portrait of your "Best friend"
« on: October 02, 2014, 08:32:13 AM »

104
Lenses / Re: Review: Canon EF 16-35 f/4L IS by Dustin Abbott
« on: September 30, 2014, 09:15:33 PM »
I have one question. I am serious as I don't know. Who needs f2.8 lens in a uwa lens?
what type of photography needs more open lenses?

I always thought uwa are for more landscape photography. I always thought that smaller apertures are better for landscape.

If the f4 lens is so good who would want the f2.8 lens.

Wedding photographers, for one.  Or event shooters that need a faster aperture to help compensate for less than ideal lighting.  People that shoot nightscapes.  There's a surprising number of applications for a wider aperture even at wide angles.  There's a reason why Canon makes a 24mm f/1.4...and why a number of people here are clamoring for Sigma to make a competitor.

But yes, landscape shooters are not ones who typically need a wider aperture.

105
Lenses / Re: Review: Canon EF 16-35 f/4L IS by Dustin Abbott
« on: September 30, 2014, 09:01:40 AM »
I hate review like this. It always push me to get one, even though I don't have a need for UWA yet.

Awesome as always Dustin  :)
I just have to copy that. (Dylan, thanks for letting me ;) )

I was out the last days in the forest with my 17-40 to get more used to UWA. If I was to... oh, my...
The only thing keeping me from going for this piece of glass is that I have other desires, too.


@Dustin:
Thank you for this really good and informative review.
Just one ;) point of criticism:
"• Not incredibly exciting?? " Where did you get this idea:
A really sharp, fantastic UWA with IS, good looking Bokeh and star bursts and you call it "not exciting" (even with those question marks)
Not really? ;)

I know, I know.  Maybe it's just me, but the lenses that I most enjoy using tend to be primes or lenses with which I can produce something more dramatic and unique.  Good zooms like a 24-70, 70-200, or this 16-35 are tools, but something like an old Helios 44-2 - that's for fun!!

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 115