« on: June 06, 2014, 01:34:04 PM »
Marketplace viability is a reasonable topic of conversation.... especially when we are their target demographic... if we have no interest, they are doing something wrong.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
ok, so every DSLR from now on will be able to upload its images to Irista via WiFi.
As of today, I have 2 600ex rt's... so I'm debating on whether I'm going to get a another to do RT or the St-e3-rt... the YN-E3-RT isn't really on my radar screen... mostly because of this thread.
Though, it is a good problem to have. Which to get... which to get.
Depends on the kind of photography
if you need the 2.8 aperture i'm afraid the 24-70 II is the only way to go
if you don't, the 24-70 II is useless because the 24-105 at f/5 5.6 is sharp from edge to edge, has IS and its way way cheaper.
It would be interesting though to wait for Sigma's 24-70 2.8 OS,
I bet it gonna be sharper from edge to edge from Tamron 24-70 VC and that might push canon to drop the price on the 24-70 II
unless you need a lens right now.
thanks again guys for all your kind here
now it's settle for me :
Camera 6D 110%
1) EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM or EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
2) EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
3) EF 35mm f/2
guys if i get the 24-105 from kit deal , it is okay to get 24-70 2.8II or no need for it ? i saw some images made from 6D and 24-70 lens and they are amazing / if i don't get the 24-105 from kit deal which one i should take ? or take both
because this camera only take one SD card and i shoot RAW which SD is good ,also waiting for tripod info :p
I will take 24-70 II over 24105 any day. If you can add 70-200mm f2.8 is ii then that is a killer combo.
Many-many CR members ended up putting their 24-105 on ebay or CL after using 24-70 II. There is no point having both of these lenses in the bag.