« on: June 18, 2014, 10:42:19 PM »
Not to mention that the 85L mkii is faster than the original... though a turtle is technically faster than a snail... but still.
HDR is often used to make a crap photo better and it ends up being a psychedelic crap photo. I'm not a huge fan of the "HDR look", but some photographers who take good photos AND use HDR have impressed me. RC Concepcion (Site) is one of those people. I don't love all his stuff, but he really seems to have a knack for taking nice HDR shots and a lot of his work is excellent.HDR is a lot like a woman wearing makeup -- it should not be immediately obvious it is being used.
If you look at a woman and the first thought is "wow, she is wearing a lot of make up" She is doin it wrong.
If you look at a photograph and the first thought is "wow, that's some HDR" you is doin it wrong.
It should be difficult to tell if an photograph was or was not HDR, if it is done well. All the viewer should notice is "wow that's a pretty photograph/woman."
In both cases you must add "unless it's being done for dramatic effect." Some women (and a few men) wear heavy makeup for dramatic effect, like wearing bright, colorful clothes. Likewise, some do HDR for the express purpose of a slightly surreal, dramatic effect. Both are personal choices. I'm not a huge fan of either in most cases, though I've seen a few examples that were quite well done.
I was doing a shoot this past weekend - full portable studio set-up with backdrop, four lights etc and the model's family were taking mobile phone shots over my shoulder as I was shooting.
Even asked me to step aside so they could shoot using my backdrop and poses!
What do we think about this one fellow photographer?
Rude or okay?
when the c100, with its 4k technology came out, there was a video about exporting stills from video. It seemed like too much Damn work... review 24000 frames.
Pssst.... C100 doesn't have 4K.
[quote =Marsu42 link=topic=21282.msg404354#msg404354 date=1402582107]The 7DII will be really fast.
For fast, look at mirrorless system ... old-school dslr tech with a flipping mirror taking a lot of straing @high fps is really a technology from the last century. Good for Canon there are enough old-school photogs around :-p
In 10 years from now, you won't even use the 7d2 as a doorstopper because your mirrorless does 100fps+ full res (or you just crop frames from video), has much more shutter cycles before it breaks and does things like "automatically track the bird with the read feathers across the whole frame".
Bring out your dead!Ahm not dead yet!and then you get articles like this one....I'm confused - the wisest CEO of them all, Marissa Mayer of Yahoo, has already said, "[T]here’s really no such thing as professional photographers anymore." Why would someone want to emulate the dead?
'And there we have it! The technique is similar to that used by professional photographers, so you’re basically a professional photographer now.'
That's what I was thinking... but tolerance to grain is a virtue I guess.With the 70D, you really can make clean photo at 3200 iso so we can expect the same result at 6400 iso for the 7dII.
Right, and pigs can fly :-> ... well, at least if you apply heavy nr you'll have a clean image, though w/o details. Good for shooting doorknobs and brick walls though :-)
Can somebody explain to me HOW lack of a mode dial is a good thing? I've never really understood the button system on the 1D line. To me it seems to be a lot slower to switch modes like this.
Us pros typically shoot in one of three modes. Manual, TV, or AV. We don't change these often, and many of us, me included, never change our mode. I always use manual. No point having a giant dial on the camera when most of your users will barely ever, or ever, use it. Much easier to implement a button system at that point. It's all about the economics of scale.
Just bought the 6D with EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM ..... also 270ex ii and RC-6
is this flash good ? or shall i replace it with 320ex
the seller give good deal for these flashes ......
now i think i need good tripod and EF 135mm f/2L USM
To save you time and money in the long run, I would skip the baby stuff and go straight to big gun 600EX-RT. It's a powerful flash, you can always reduce the power level if need to.
You can add more more speedlite later, plus the 600ex transmitter can trigger 600ex-rt speedlites from 200ft distance. YUP....200 feet
I must be a slow shooter cause it seems unlikely for me to shoot more than 10000 photos on a single event. That is a photo as second for three hours! And those can't be CR2s or they would have filled a 256GB card! I was at the F1 GP last weekend and took 2000 pics on the first day. Granted there is lots of dead times on such an event but still...
I guess a benefit of using small cards is that it limits the number of folders to 1....
. but it was of nephrons and really not very interesting...
Anyone else ever strip the little holes off the film so advancing the film "didn't" and the result was a bunch of exposures on the same frame?
I didi something similar this winter. I was shooting film on my old Nikkormat and when I tried to wind it back at the end of the roll, I felt a little resistance and then it went smooth again. I thought the film was all in the can so I opened up to change and... the film had snapped and was ruined by me opening the lid. I was pretty sad as I felt I had taken some nice images.
I've got another one next to me now doing 4 baby "Watch me grow" shoots with 4 shots printed out per shoot, an album at the end and all of the pics on a CD for £200 (about $335).
Quality of the pics are crap but people are booking her - is our art dead?
600mm f/4L IS II, $21.67/mm (or 0.046mm/$, if you prefer). Great justification for adding a TC, the 2x drops it to just $11.25/mm.