Redbubble is another one.
I like to "work" with my digital negatives with Photoshop.
It`s not a matter of fixing something, its the process of optimizing the material I have.
Looking back to the darkroom days and even with some romantic memories I prefer the possibilities of today AND Photoshop.
Better results. And this counts.
Would be a drawback not using Photoshop.
i use corner of my t shirt... they are tougher than u think....
This [CR2] rumor said that it will arrive within the next 12 months.
Well, now it's been 15 months. I couldn't be more annoyed.
I do agree that all lenses should come with their respective hoods. It's just a piece of plastic after all. What we don't need is those useless suede lens pouches that offer no protection whatsover!
I bought the hood for the nifty fifty but ended up never using it and gave it away free when I sold the lens. The 10-22 and 17-40 also share a hood that is rather pointless. I rarely use that one.
The 135L has a hood that just looks ridiculous and doubles the length. I try to avoid it if I can.
The 85 1.8 had a very flimsy hood.
My issue with hoods is that the majority of amateurs think they go on backwards! Which makes me look like the idiot geek that stands out!
Stick with the 17-40. I have one and it is a workhorse.