October 22, 2014, 05:56:02 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MrFotoFool

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17
1
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D + EF24-105L f/4
« on: October 21, 2014, 07:47:47 PM »
No personal experience, but as stated above I myself would not buy a gray market product.

2
United States / Re: Is this the norm or outrageous?
« on: October 19, 2014, 06:57:52 PM »
For framed prints that sounds very cheap to me.

3
Business of Photography/Videography / Re: Website Advice Please
« on: October 19, 2014, 06:49:18 PM »
So many thousands (millions) of photos are being uploaded these days that I do not think there is any way to guarantee your photos show up in a search. I am not sure a different website format would help (but I am not expert and would be interested on hearing stories from others who have switched).

One of the things I read in articles on the subject is that one factor to increase your ranking is the number of verifiable external links you have to your site. In other words, the more legitimate websites that have a link to your site, the higher you will be ranked in a search.

4
Street & City / Re: Famous icons in your city
« on: October 19, 2014, 02:08:38 AM »
The Rattlesnake Bridge on the edge of downtown Tucson, Arizona (my home).

This was when it first opened several years ago. The trees have now grown to the extent that they block part of the view from this angle. In fact there is really no way to get a complete photo of the entire bridge from the ground now.

(Taken on slide film with a Canon Elan2e).

5
Photography Technique / Re: Noise in 5D III - Concern or my fault?
« on: October 14, 2014, 12:28:05 PM »
I realize this is heresy, but you could always use film for night shots!  :o

6
Photography Technique / Re: Noise in 5D III - Concern or my fault?
« on: October 13, 2014, 11:40:01 PM »
Bad choice, only use full iso stops (100/200/400/...) or you lose image quality.

I am fairly certain that is an urban legend with no basis in reality.

7
Photography Technique / Re: A lot of FREE photo magazines
« on: October 13, 2014, 11:32:00 PM »
If you are a working photographer or you work in the photo industry (as I do at a photo lab), you can get a free subscription to a real printed monthly photo magazine (not an e-zine). Rangefinder is put out by the Wedding and Portrait Photographers International. They offer free subscriptions to anyone in the industry and the magazine is not available at newsstands.

My lab also used to get a free consumer photo magazine to hand out to customers called PhotoMedia. It was a great magazine published three times a year and distributed only through camera shops and photo labs in the western United States. Unfortunately they stopped the print version a couple years ago (it may still be online).

8
I have been watching the old ODD COUPLE television show from the 1970's on Hulu.com. (I believe this internet site may only work in the United States?). The Felix Unger character (the neat one) made his living on the show as a commercial photographer. I had forgotten just how prominent his photography was in some of the episodes. What is even better, it is an accurate (and positive) portrayal of a working photographer.

9
Lenses / Re: used 300 f2.8 IS or new sigma 120-300 f2.8
« on: October 11, 2014, 10:03:34 PM »
Just wanted to update my status: the 328 has arrived and I couldn't be happier. I thought my other L lenses focused fast before, this thing is miles ahead in terms of speed! Thank you all for your recommendations.

Good choice. Another downside to the Sigma is that it is much shorter than 300mm. I am not sure about the newest version, but the two previous versions were reported to only be about 260mm. (Surprises me they can get away with calling it a 300).

10
Lenses / Re: Which prime lens for nature fotography?
« on: October 11, 2014, 09:59:44 PM »
300 makes sense if you think you will use it alone quite a bit, as well as with the extender. If you will use it almost exclusively with an extender (as a 600) then it makes little sense. Buy a 500 or 600. 300 is too short for a lot of wildlife (and especially birds), but is great for landscape if that is part of what you mean by nature photography.

If you want to save weight, the new Tamron 150-600 zoom is getting really nice reviews and the images I am seeing from it on the forums look really good. Of course a Canon fixed prime will be sharper, but I am surprisingly impressed with the Tamron images. I expect Sigma's upcoming equivalent to be similar.

11
Animal Kingdom / Re: Zoo Pics 3
« on: October 11, 2014, 09:48:39 PM »
Juvenile elephant brothers sparring (a three year old and seven year old).
Reid Park Zoo, Tucson, Arizona, USA, October 11, 2014.

12
Animal Kingdom / Re: Zoo Pics 3
« on: October 11, 2014, 09:47:22 PM »
@tomscott - nice series  :)

13
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 05, 2014, 06:35:54 PM »
If it was a full spread in New York Times, I would expect it to be a product for the masses. (Just my hunch). Definitely not a high MP pro body, because that is a limited market and the people who would buy it will be all over the news without need of an expensive ad like this.

My fear is it is some kind of camera phone gimmick or perhaps mirrorless or perhaps large sensor compact. Or as someone else has said it may not even be camera related at all.

14
Animal Kingdom / Re: Zoo Pics 3
« on: October 04, 2014, 09:40:49 AM »
Florida panther at Flamingo Gardens, August, 2014.
Great one. Is that behind glass or open?

The Florida panther is through glass.

15
I realize this is all speculation and may come to nothing. But if there is a high MP that costs $8000, it is hard to imagine why someone would not just fork over $9000 and get a medium format Pentax. Or spend $3000 for a Nikon D810 (which at $5000 less would surely cover the cost of replacing lenses). Still, this is an unsubstantiated rumor and may come to nothing.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17