May 18, 2013, 04:03:52 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MrFotoFool

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
Young forum members may not realize why Kodachrome is different than other color films.  It is actually a black and white film with no color dies built in - the color is added during the processing stage.  That is also why it is more stable than all the earlier generation color film.  I work at a pro lab and we often scan people's old slides - the kodachromes look great while the ektachromes are all red (or some other color).  BTW the newer films no longer have this problem - especially Fujichrome slide film.

That is also why no one with remaining Kodachrome will ever be able to process it.  The machinery is huge, you need a certified chemist on site, and the chemicals are so toxic they are illegal in many areas.  My lab had to ship ours out to Los Angeles because it was illegal in our county in southern Arizona.  After they stopped doing it and Dwayne's in Kansas was the last place, we just gave people Dwayne's contact info.  Now they are done too.

Back to the original topic, I would shoot one shot at each of America's 36 top national parks.  A shot of the Grand Canyon, as shot of Yosemite Valley, a shot of a redwood at Sequoia, etc.

32
Animal Kingdom / Re: Animal Kingdom by CCY020
« on: March 01, 2013, 01:16:39 AM »
Really nice.  Took me a little while to find the animal in the third photo.

33
EOS Bodies / Re: New DSLR at the End of March [CR2]
« on: March 01, 2013, 01:08:00 AM »
To those who complain about "boring" or "incremental" upgrades, not just on this thread but on many CR threads, I would ask how much better can cameras really get?  Just about any model SLR made today by any manufacturer gives astounding results.  Camera improvements in the last four years or so are so amazing that it is almost inconceivable to me they can really get much better.  "Usable" high ISO of "only" 1600 or 3200 is not good enough?  There was a time not too long ago that most of us would never use film above 400 ISO.  I used 100 ISO slide film almost exclusively (often pushed to 200 for animal photography) and was ecstatic when Provia 400X came out with an acceptable level of grain.  The fact that I can use my 5D2 (the only DSLR I have ever owned) at 800 with essentially the same quality as 100, and even 1600 to make fine poster prints, still boggles my mind.

34
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: sigma 85 1.4 focus problem
« on: February 27, 2013, 09:14:47 PM »
Thanks for all the replies.  I guess I need to contact them and see what they say.

35
Third Party Manufacturers / sigma 85 1.4 focus problem
« on: February 27, 2013, 01:08:31 AM »
I bought a Sigma 85 1.4 about 8 months ago and am looking for feedback from other users.  It focuses fine at longer distances, but at or near the close focus limit it hunts continuously and will not autofocus.  I have to switch to manual focus to shoot close subjects.  Is this just a quirk of my copy or does this happen to others?  I am using a 5D2, which I know is not the fastest focusing camera, but I have it locked on center focus point and this problem happens even with still subjects (and does not happen with any other lens).

Also, is this something Sigma would or could fix under warranty if I contact them?  (I will likely try anyway, just wondering if anyone else has done this with success).

36
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: Where am I ?
« on: February 26, 2013, 11:47:56 AM »
I was going to guess Monticello also, your comment about the nickel being a clear giveaway.  (For those of you outside the USA, the nickel coin features Thomas Jefferson on front and his home Monticello on back).

37
Lenses / Re: Canon 6D (Body Only) which lens to purchase?
« on: February 26, 2013, 11:42:57 AM »
24-105 f/4L kit lens is fantastic - much better than many on this forum assume.  I got it with my 5D2 kit and it is unbelievably sharp, IS works great, constant f/4 is better than variable aperture on consumer grade zooms, and size is ideal.  It balances PERFECTLY with a 5D series and should be pretty good on a 6D as well.

The new Sigma gets great reviews, but aftermarket is always a gamble.  I think this one has their brand new system where you can plug in a USB for future body upgrades to prevent the problem of Sigma's not working with new camera bodies?  Of course this system has not had a chance to be tested yet, so I am not 100% convinced it will always work.  I got burned recently on a fantastic Sigma pro zoom (100-300 f/4) that suddenly stopped autofocusing and Sigma told me it is too old to fix.

38
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Film EOS Body
« on: February 17, 2013, 06:00:22 PM »
The EOS 3 is awesome and the eye control focus was the best thing Canon ever innovated. Don't understand why they abandoned it.

Agree wholeheartedly.  I had two Elan IIe's for a good part of my photo life and used eye control all the time.  As some of you recall, Canon ran some Art Wolfe ads at the time of the EOS 3 stating he was now getting photos he never could before - which was a direct (but not explicitely stated) slam against Nikon, the system he switched from.  Canon had something no one else had and I do not understand why they abandoned it.  (Not fast enough maybe?)

Anyway, I replaced them with an EOS 1 that I got for 300 bucks at a camera show several years ago, then replaced that with a 1N in mint condition that a customer at my photo lab gave me for free.  I see you decided on the 1N and I think you will be happy with it.  Sadly, no eye control focus though.

39
Software & Accessories / Re: Gloves for Photography
« on: February 16, 2013, 02:56:38 PM »
You might be able to find some good gloves at your local bicycle shop.  They are sometimes called glove liners because they are meant to wear underneath the fingerless gloves cyclists wear all the time.  I have a pair from Bontrager, which is the brand of accessories made by Trek.  If you have an official Trek Bikes near you those are great.  I think these gloves are essentially the same as the official Photographers Gloves made by Lowepro, which is of course another option if there is a camera store near you that carries them.

40
While I see the need for compact cameras, it does seem like there are way too many models.  Canon is guilty of this but so are other brands.  Perhaps Quasimodo is correct, the high number is to appease different sellers.

I also think - no I KNOW - they have way too many features/settings.  I teach beginning digital camera classes at a photo lab and no one I have met in seven years of classes will ever need or want to use all those features.  Almost every class I teach, someone has a new scene mode I have not seen before.  I honestly think if someone made a true point-and-shoot with high quality and NO menu options, NO video, just a shutter button and flash on/off and playback button, they would sell boatloads.  If it had an optical viewfinder, I would probably use it myself.

41
For years I used the 300 f4 (non-IS that I got used cheap) and 1.4x ii extender.  Very sharp with or without and I have no hesitation recommending it.  I have seen online that the IS version of the 300 f4 is not quite as sharp as the older non-IS that I had, but I think the difference is too small to notice in real life usage.  I even used the lens with the 2x ii for awhile, though of course it was manual focus only.  Got perfectly acceptable results with that and with the 1.4x outstanding results.  Two main advantages to this (over 400 5.6) is ability to use a larger aperture (300 f4) and much closer focus.

The only reason I sold my 300 f4 is I needed a zoom so I got the 70-200 2.8 to use with 1.4x extender.  (Well first I got a Sigma 100-300 f4, but then the autofocus broke and Sigma said it was too old to fix...)

42
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM
« on: January 28, 2013, 01:54:25 AM »
Obviously at 24mm and obviously through the safety of a zoo window.
5Dmk2.

43
Street & City / Re: High ISO Paddington on a wet night
« on: January 28, 2013, 01:42:50 AM »
The colors on those are incredible!  Especially like the middle one with the colored lights reflecting off the tracks.

44
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: January 28, 2013, 01:39:30 AM »
Speckled rattlesnake in reptile house.
5Dmk2 with Canon 100 2.8 macro at f/3.5, iso 2000.

45
Software & Accessories / Re: Shooting in the rain
« on: January 13, 2013, 04:42:14 PM »
There are a lot of fancy ones if you shoot in the rain all the time.  But if you only do it on rare occasion (as I do), these cheapie OpTech ones work great.  They come in a set of two for six bucks - I bought a pair years ago and have not worn out the first one yet.  Just an angled plastic sleeve with a drawstring on the lens end and a small hole for the viewfinder.  Pull the eyecup off first, put the bag over the camera, slip the eyecup on over the plastic to hold it in place.

http://www.adorama.com/OTRSL.html

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6