July 29, 2014, 11:59:19 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Cory

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: March 27, 2014, 11:28:18 AM »
headed to Alaska from Seattle:


Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 6D Body $1499
« on: March 14, 2014, 05:35:32 PM »
Speaking of this, what would you say about complementing my 70D/35mm lens with an UWA or replacing the 70D with a 6D to get a wider (likely wide enough in most cases) view with the same 35mm lens? 
Also, is 24mm usually enough in most cases for indoor/real-estate/architecture photography?
And, while we're at it, has anyone missed the "crop" factor when moving on to full-frame?
I never do any video or continuous shooting; if that matters.

Landscape / Re: Sunset landscape
« on: March 05, 2014, 12:44:05 AM »
Beautiful sky colors. Well done Cory.
Thanks.  I looked out the window at 6AM, screamed and grabbed my camera.  Ran out in 10 degrees in bare feet.  It came and went quickly.

Landscape / Re: Sunset landscape
« on: March 04, 2014, 05:06:08 PM »

EOS Bodies / Re: Full Frame Vs Crop Sensor
« on: March 03, 2014, 06:52:10 PM »
If it helps with the discussion - tried a Sigma 18-35 yesterday at a workshop on my 70D and was thoroughly blown away.  So thoroughly that I ordered one today.

Lenses / Re: Alaska Vacation Suggestions
« on: March 01, 2014, 11:46:13 AM »
To see what you might be in for feel free to check out my Alaskan pictures at www.flickr.com/photos/corysteiner/
Sounds like you're off to a good start.

Lenses / Re: Affected with GAS, Gear Acquisition Syndrome
« on: March 01, 2014, 11:44:45 AM »
I have a similar affliction where I try to keep the gear to an absolute minimum, but with each piece of gear being the absolute best possible in its respective niche.  It's really quite horrible.  I'm now considering a full-frame just to get the desired focal length range out of a particular lens.  Very messed up.

Lenses / Is 35mm on Crop Wide Enough for Landscape (in many/most cases)?
« on: February 24, 2014, 07:18:04 PM »
Would you say that 35mm on a crop will work most of the time for landscape/sunset/etc.?  Might not be able to get the foreground subject/nice background effect, but otherwise... (in many cases)?

Sports / Re: Volleyball
« on: February 24, 2014, 11:20:21 AM »
A recent one:

Lenses / Re: Good Non-Sports Mix - 10-22 + 35 2.0 IS?
« on: February 17, 2014, 10:53:22 PM »
I think I'm there.  Thanks.
Would this filter work (even at 10mm)?:


Lenses / Good Non-Sports Mix - 10-22 + 35 2.0 IS?
« on: February 17, 2014, 05:04:54 PM »
     This should conclude my novice-like posts.  I use the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 (on my 70D) for sports and can't say enough about that combo (especially for indoors and might eventually get some sort of telephoto zoom for outdoors). 
     My 35 2.0 IS does most everything else and does it well, but I might like to broaden my horizons with something wider for landscapes.  Would you say that the 10-22 would nicely complement a 35 (on a crop of course)?  Also considering the 24 2.8 IS and am also considering nothing.
     Thanks again for all of the shared knowledge and experience.

EOS Bodies / Re: What's Next from Canon?
« on: February 13, 2014, 10:18:14 PM »
I think it's more exciting to take better pictures on old inferior gear, but I'm in for a 16-50 that's nice, priced not-too-badly and moderately compact (and f4 is a reasonable compromise).

EOS Bodies / Re: What's Next from Canon?
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:37:26 PM »
16-50 f/4 IS
Is there a 16-50 inbound?  That could be what I'm looking for.

PowerShot / Re: More Images of the PowerShot G1 X Mark II
« on: February 11, 2014, 08:19:32 AM »
Could this be the ultimate no-fuss travel camera? 

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15