October 02, 2014, 10:58:02 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - florianbieler.de

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
106
Lenses / Re: Canon 135L f/2
« on: February 13, 2013, 04:42:15 PM »
My new revised weather isolation technique which shall be named "Breakfast Bag" finally reached its ultimate form. You can only hardly distinguish it from a non-isolated 135L.




107
Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: February 13, 2013, 04:36:08 PM »
Oh you mean like the 35 1.4 which is a big ass dream contrary to the older 50 1.4 and 85 1.4 which just fuck up on every full frame?

108
Lenses / Re: Canon 135L f/2
« on: February 13, 2013, 04:34:08 PM »
Um it's only gonna snow a bit on saturday, my 5D3 should stand that. Gotta get one of that rainbags in the future somehow though.

109
Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: February 13, 2013, 04:03:21 PM »
What is a "Sigma Art 50"?

110
Lenses / Re: Canon 135L f/2
« on: February 13, 2013, 04:02:43 PM »
Did that. Revised it to a v2 after recognizing some dust under the filter and ripping it off again.  ::)

111
Lenses / Re: Canon 135L f/2
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:37:44 PM »
Weather-proofed my 135 today. Well, at least temporarily.


112
Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses
« on: February 13, 2013, 12:35:56 PM »
The 50 1.4 suffered heavy price drops here in germany today, about 15% down on several retailers. Hope that means they're getting rid of it and its replacement is on the way.

113
I'm afraid a 14-24 will be insanely expensive, let alone you'd take a 16-35 and put up an IS to that... 2000$ pew pew.

114
Lenses / Re: Which pair of lenses to get?
« on: February 12, 2013, 05:34:31 PM »
For 24-70 I recommend the Tamron with 2.8 and VC. Telephoto wise, well no one can decide that for you. The 70-200 4L IS is dead sharp, 2.8L II IS is even sharper. Also, double the cost.

115
Lenses / Re: suggestions????
« on: February 12, 2013, 05:30:24 PM »
Sigma 35 1.4 is image quality wise better than Canon's 2.0, the latter comes with IS though if you need it for handholding and low light. I would probably also go with the Sigma though just because it's awesome sharp at 1.4.

116
Site Information / Re: Can't change signature / profile
« on: February 12, 2013, 02:54:21 PM »
Can't change my signature either.

117
Lenses / Re: Vintage Lenses: Any Advise?
« on: February 12, 2013, 02:44:59 PM »
When you want to use a Takumar 50mm 1.4 SMC on a full frame, you'll run into the problem with the mirror hitting the back of the lens. You can mod the lens though, wrote a bit about that on my website www.florianbieler.de. Going to try the lens out as soon as my M42 adapter arrives.

118
When you want to use a Takumar 50mm 1.4 SMC on a full frame, you'll run into the problem with the mirror hitting the back of the lens. You can mod the lens though, wrote a bit about that on my website www.florianbieler.de. Going to try the lens out as soon as my M42 adapter arrives.

119
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« on: February 12, 2013, 02:44:06 PM »
When you want to use a Takumar 50mm 1.4 SMC on a full frame, you'll run into the problem with the mirror hitting the back of the lens. You can mod the lens though, wrote a bit about that on my website www.florianbieler.de. Going to try the lens out as soon as my M42 adapter arrives.

120
EOS Bodies / Re: New Cinema Camera & Lenses for NAB 2013
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:06:48 PM »
They should really consider announcing some new EF lenses... especially that damn 50mm IS I crave.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13