May 24, 2013, 12:52:21 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - florianbieler.de

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
31
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: April 07, 2013, 06:51:02 AM »

32
Street & City / My surroundings at night.
« on: April 07, 2013, 06:50:45 AM »
A little series I started.


Welcome to the Manor. von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Emission von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Blue Wonder von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Origin of Symmetry von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Principal Curvature von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

33
Lenses / Re: Is the upcoming 50mm F/2 IS USM for me?
« on: April 03, 2013, 04:40:32 PM »
I had all the 50's... first the 1.8 shortly after acquiring my first EOS (Rebel T1i 3 years ago) and I quite liked it for the first while despite its lack of build quality and the focus often not really hitting home. I then sold it and bought a 50 1.4, which definitely was my favourite lens on the old Rebel, I was satisfied with the performance. Then I got my 5D3 and suddenly was not so satisfied anymore. Pictures were quite soft at open apertures, of course they also were on the Rebel but when upgrading from a Rebel T1i to a 5D Mark III the difference really hits you in the face.

So, I tried the Sigma 50 1.4 which of course achieves a good sharpness and overall has great image quality but as many others I got one where the focus was completely off, it focused wrong and even differently wrong depending on the focal distance. Trashed it and the idea of sending my body to Sigma to adjust the lens to my camera. I decided to wait for a new Canon 50, which just has to happen in the near time after new 24, 28, 35 and 40 and probably will also sport an IS. There were rumours of an upcoming 1.4 IS, I don't think it's realistic, 2.0 IS is more likely. But, as we all know, that rumour has been out there for months now, there is nothing on the horizon. So... what to do?

I always - always - glanced at the 1.2L, but steered clear from it because I was blinded by test charts like the one on the first page where one is lead to the assumption that the 1.2 is not any better, no even worse than the 1.4 or even the 1.8.

Nevertheless, I took the jump and bought it. I tell you, once you use it, you won't notice. Bokeh, AF, the overall build quality and just that special look of the pictures make up for every lower result in some test chart. If I need sharp, I put on my 100L or 135L. Weather sealing is just another gimmick I love, it's a perfect walkaround lens for walks or snapshots and it's exceptional aperture also makes an IS quite obsolete for me and furthermore it's a perfect toy for indoor portraits, when the light is not-so-great. I love it and won't exchange it now if a new 50 comes out.

A new 85 on the other hand could be something for me  ::)

34
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D as a Compliment to 5DMkiii
« on: April 02, 2013, 02:56:09 PM »
Well, in my opinion it is harsh to come at other members only because he owns and uses not one but two 1DX and a 5D3, but then on the other side he's got nothing to show but coverage of unknown sports events. With that gear it is not so special to do that and that provides no good base for a discussion about this camera detail crap whether to use the center point or one above, it probably makes absolutely no difference anyway.

35
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D as a Compliment to 5DMkiii
« on: April 02, 2013, 12:20:51 PM »
Finally, I never use the center point either.  Why would I? 

Just for amusement I thumbed through the first three pages of your Flickr stream to see what you shoot.  I found it amusing that all but maybe 2 photos had the subject smack dab in the center.

This is just the stupid comment I was expecting from you.  The faces are in focus right?  They're faces aren't in the center.  They are two AF points up the vertical set of AF points on my camera. 

In other words, you're wrong.  See ya.

No offense but this seems to be the right time to ask what the heck you shoot there anyway. Two 1DX, a 5D3 and all I see is completely random sports boredom. Are you a professional booked solely for this purpose? I'd sure use that gear for other stuff in my spare time.

36
Lenses / Re: 50mm: Wich one?
« on: March 27, 2013, 06:49:26 PM »
Get the L.  ::)

37
Lenses / Re: Canon 50 L II
« on: March 27, 2013, 05:34:50 PM »
And the 135mm f/2L is still going strong at 17 years.

That beautiful thing is 17 years old?  :o

38
Portrait / Re: My 5D Mark III portraits
« on: March 25, 2013, 02:12:25 PM »
Now a test run with my new 50L inside with no external lights used.


Black Swan von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia IV von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia III von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia II von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

39
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
« on: March 25, 2013, 02:11:44 PM »
With 5D3.


Black Swan von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia IV von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia III von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia II von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

40
All done with 5D3 and 50L.


Black Swan von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia IV von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia III von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia II von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

41
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: March 25, 2013, 02:10:54 PM »
50L on all of them.


Black Swan von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia IV von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia III von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia II von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

42
Lenses / Re: Need your opinions on selling my 50L and 24/70L
« on: March 25, 2013, 02:09:00 PM »
Well I owned the 50 1.4 on my 500D times back then, I didn't like it so much anymore on the 5D3 and sold it. I now got the 50L and absolutely love it, you just can't compare them. The 50L is big, heavy, a bokeh monster and weather isolated whereas the 50 1.4 is a average built 20 year old lens with just a different look.

43
Lenses / Re: 35L or 50L?
« on: March 18, 2013, 06:41:11 PM »
The new Sigma 35mm 1.4 is a complete new design and doesn't suffer from the focus issues like the 50/1.4 and 85/1.4.

44
Lenses / Re: 35L or 50L?
« on: March 18, 2013, 05:17:32 PM »
The focus issues with the 50L have been fixed in newer revisions as I was told... I got a lens from 2012 and I have no focus shift issues at all, tried various apertures and they all fit.

45
Lens Gallery / Re: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
« on: March 17, 2013, 04:12:09 PM »
Got it a week ago, did almost a whole portrait shooting with it today (only 135L for one other picture), here's the first. Wide open of course. Bokehlicious.


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12