August 28, 2014, 05:27:00 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sporgon

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 120
527
Landscape / Re: Sunset landscape
« on: March 04, 2014, 04:08:29 PM »
Not really a sunset landscape, but I'm not sure what else I'd call it.

528
EOS Bodies / Re: Full Frame Vs Crop Sensor
« on: March 04, 2014, 10:42:37 AM »

A lot of people seem to have difficulty grasping this concept. Including some who think they know better in this thread.  ;D   Its shown quite well in this article.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml

Note that no where in the luminous landscape article did the guy refer to subject isolation.
DOF and subject isolation (or background blur - or do you mean something else?) are not necessarily the same.
Taking pictures with a short focal length and short subject distance vs with a long focal length and longer subject distance (for the same framing, using the same camera and aperture) results in the same dof, but the latter will give you a much blurrier background.

How about - "For the same magnification of the area in focus (different lenses, different distances), longer focal length at the same aperture will give you same DoF and more background magnification".
Yes. Or, in simple statements, which I can remember easier :) :
The longer the lens at the same f, the more blur, but same dof.
The smaller the f at the same mm, the more blur, and less dof.
(assuming the same framing)

My point is that the article deals with pure theory of one aspect, sets up an experiment to prove that theory, ( correctly ) but then does nothing to put this into practical context, creating the real possibility of leaving someone who is new to photography, but trying to learn, more confused about what they find in practice.

That's all. There are people who post on CR who are better at putting pure physics into practical context.

529
Software & Accessories / Re: Louis Vuitton bag
« on: March 03, 2014, 03:31:45 PM »

It's a tough job, but somebody has to separate a fool from her money ... Thanks Louis!

Or a fool from his money

My wife has a LV bag and guess who paid for it ?  :(

530
Software & Accessories / Re: Louis Vuitton bag
« on: March 03, 2014, 03:18:47 PM »
Can you get a fake one ?  ;)

531
Animal Kingdom / Re: Your best animal shots!
« on: March 03, 2014, 02:02:50 PM »
I think one of my favourites, we had planned this shot the day before, the Male Leopard was mating so we knew he would be in the area late at night, not hunting, moving slowly as his work was cut out for him mating about every 5 minutes (tough guys these male Leopards), light was from another vehicle placed with it's headlights on the Animal.

We were able to set up quite close to the Animal without spooking it, allowing a series of Images, of which I think this was the best.

1Dx & 300f/2.8 II

What a great shot ! Honestly some of your African wildlife shots look as if you'd have to shoot them in a studio ! ;D

532
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 03, 2014, 01:57:50 PM »
1Dx
600mm

Intriguing use of a 600 mil. Great perspective, like it !

533
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: March 03, 2014, 01:27:08 PM »
Lovely Image Sporgon, Sunlight on the boats, Mist on the Sea, Beautiful.

Edward & Click; many thanks. As often happens with landscapes the beautiful light was fleeting, which is why many of my Panoramics are hand held, as this was. The mist parted for about two minutes, allowing the sun to shine through, then it was dank and dark again.

534
EOS Bodies / Re: Full Frame Vs Crop Sensor
« on: March 03, 2014, 01:18:35 PM »

A lot of people seem to have difficulty grasping this concept. Including some who think they know better in this thread.  ;D   Its shown quite well in this article.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml

Note that no where in the luminous landscape article did the guy refer to subject isolation.

535
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM "Pancake"
« on: March 02, 2014, 05:00:37 PM »
A visit to Nottingham University - more expense coming  :(

Took my point-and-shoot @ f2.8 ( 5D + 40 pancake).

If that's your daughter, congrats!

 ;D ;), yes she gets her looks from me.

Here's another 40 Pancake shot, this time a panoramic of North Landing, a cove just North of Flamborough Head, famous for it's chalk cliffs and nesting sea birds.

5DII + 40mm @ 1/200, f9, ISO 160. Hand held five frame pano.

It was a very misty morning, but the sun broke through for about one minute, then everything was covered in a blanket of fog again. No time for a tripod.

536
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: March 02, 2014, 03:40:29 PM »
Here's my final version of North Landing, a sheltered cove North of Flamborough Head. I'm actually standing in front of the disused lifeboat house, and the boat used to be launched down the steep slope, guided by the monorail into the sea. You can just see the bottom of it is the right of the picture.

It must have been one hell of a sight to see the lifeboat flying down this slipway into a stormy sea.  The boat has now been moved to South Landing, probably because with a very low tide, like in this picture, it could not be launched.

537
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Sell 7D in favor of 6D or 5D2...?
« on: March 01, 2014, 03:27:21 PM »
A friend is borrowing my 7D and I have been using my 40D until I get it back. I have almost forgotten how much I loved my 40D. It has great ergonomics and the image quality is fantastic. Photos are sharp and the AF system, even though is dated a little is very fast and dead on the majority of the time, even in low light. The frame rate is good and isn't far from the 7D. I have always wanted another FF (ex got the 5D2 in the divorce) and I don't need (or afford) a 5D3.  What do you guys think? This would give me a nice crop body for when I need one and a good FF when I want one.

D

I'm confused. In your gear signature you say your wife shoots Nikon, yet in the divorce settlement she has insisted on taking the 5D II ? Ah, well thinking on it that's not really surprising, though divorcing your partner in order to get hold of his 5D seems a little extreme.

Between the 5DII and the 6D it really boils down to two things: the 6D has much better high ISO performance and the 5DII has the 'proper' ergonomics of a joystick, decent rear wheel and good solid click stops.

The AF of the 6D is more realiable in terms of consistency for want of a better description. If your going to be hypercritical it also has a very subtle improvement in tonal quality even at low ISOs.

The 6D is also a really good fit in your hand.

538
EOS-M / Re: Is the canon eos-m a dead end system?
« on: March 01, 2014, 03:09:33 PM »

Millions of people dide not really want it ... but were not offered anything else at prices affordable to regular income earners with photography being one of their hobbies.


You're overlooking the fact that a very high percentage of camera buyers still like the concept of seeing through their camera's lens, optically. This trend may change in the future, but at the present time sales figures support this fact.

539
Canon General / Re: Why Image Quality isn't Everything
« on: February 28, 2014, 04:58:36 PM »
Am I the only one that thinks these pictures look faked ? Look at the animal's size in relation to the peoole in the different pictures; it keeps changing.

540
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Announcement in Q2 of 2014 [CR1]
« on: February 27, 2014, 05:17:29 PM »
Seeing as the D4s is coming with a 'new' 16 mp sensor, I'm going to be brave and guess the 7DII will also be 16 mp, aps class leading low light performance, very fast and no pop up flash. See you in the second quarter. 

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 120