February 01, 2015, 05:34:16 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sporgon

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 145
766
Lenses / Re: New 50mm Sigma ? There are other options !
« on: April 11, 2014, 11:06:42 AM »
DXO mark one of the most trusted resources online

Whoa ! Steady.

( It's the 11th of April to day. You missed out a 1 ).

767
Black & White / Re: Black & White
« on: April 11, 2014, 09:32:52 AM »
Bit of fun on a film set.

768
Lenses / Re: New 50mm Sigma ? There are other options !
« on: April 11, 2014, 01:46:33 AM »
I think being able to catch precious moments--rather than laziness ::) -- instead of changing lenses is one good reason to use something such as a 24-70mm rather than 3 primes.
But what does ANY of this have to do with the new 50mm Sigma, which your title referred to?
The difference between 35mm and 50mm on an SLR might seem slight to you, but not to models who see the difference in distortion right away.  Sure, the 35mm is great for many shots, but, even on a cropped sensor, what is the point of saying x brand of 35 is an option to any brand of 50mm?

Heck, an iPhone is an option to an SLR, but that's kind of a wide net for a topic too.

Why do I feel as if somebody is about to say, "April Fools!"?

You could take the OP in the context of the next arrival in the EF IS prime line ; the 50 IS - assuming it does arrive. Could be a really fine 50. Problem is a lot of people dismiss f1.8 despite the fact that if it's stellar wide open this speed is fast enough 99.9% of the time.

769
Street & City / Re: Your best street shots of any kind.
« on: April 10, 2014, 06:26:42 PM »
A few city street shots with a difference; nineteenth century London. Shot with 40mm and time machine.

770
On topic ... I sold my EF 40mm f/2.8 STM lens because it backfocused. This was apparently within specifications and I was told to upgrade my cameras to AFMA-enabled models to solve the problem.

Sounds like you've been unlucky; most people seem to report very little MA needed on the 40 pancakes. The AFMA enabled models have completely changed my attitude and needs in lenses. Before, the quality of the manual focus mechanism on a lens was very important to me. Now with AFMA and BBF I basically don't use manual focus anymore, and so I'm using cheaper versions of lenses than I once would have done. Even when zone focusing I use AF. The only exception would be when focusing for a specific distance that is covered by the lens's distance scale.

I've had non AFMA cameras such as the 5D that have been fine until the body has suffered a good heavy knock or drop. Then the critical focus on a fast lens is out.

The irony of it is that these DSLR bodies are highly resilient to physical abuse, but an impact can shift the position of the AF module enough to cause problems.

771
Lenses / Re: a 50mm dilemma.
« on: April 10, 2014, 07:42:23 AM »
I'm waiting to see what Canon has to offer in the new prime IS line. The current three offerings are really excellent, though as has been pointed out by various people on CR because they are the same f stop as the old ones they are regarded as uninteresting 'refreshes': far from the truth.

If a future IS 50mm is in the same vein, that is stellar wide open at say 1.8 or even an f2 lens ( I think it will be 1.8 or 1.7 for marketing purposes), then it could be very interesting after the initial EAP has finished.

772
Technical Support / Re: Canon Rebel T3 Feature guide not turning off
« on: April 09, 2014, 05:06:47 PM »
I've just purchased the Canon Rebel T3 and am learning to use it. However I can't seem to get the feature guide to turn off though I've set it in the menu. Unless I'm misunderstanding what that is.

Here is a photo of the screen that appears to still show the guide though I have it turned off... am I mistaken as to what this is?

Thank you!
Nancy


From your picture I think you have the camera mode dial set on 'no flash', first icon anticlockwise from green box.

When learning just use M, Av or Tv and learn how to control aperture and shutter speed according to what you require. Also you have to manually set the ISO in these modes. P mode can be used as a modified Av mode.

The t3 is a great little camera, not appreciated by gearophiles, but highly capable non the less.

773
Lenses / Re: Which lens to go with
« on: April 08, 2014, 01:36:42 PM »
Sounds like a monopod would be of benefit.

Where these equestrian photographers are shooting cross country events and have to be based at one fence, some of them do use monopods or even tripods. However when shooting show jumping events the photographer inside the ring moves around to get the competitors over more than one fence. The whole round only lasts about 60 seconds. I have never seen a monopod used by anyone under these circumstances.

You can see the sort of thing on his website: www.jumpforit.co.uk

You might even see me  ;)

774
Technical Support / Re: Err 30 (stuck shutter) once - get it serviced?
« on: April 08, 2014, 05:09:04 AM »
I think if it were mine I would leave it as is unless it happens again.If it happens again under a different set of circumstances I would be concerned.

775
Lenses / Re: Which lens to go with
« on: April 07, 2014, 03:39:05 PM »
Regarding lens size and weight there is no substitute to testing this yourself.

I wouldn't consider any of the 70-200mm zooms too heavy for extended use. If for example someone can safely carry a baby, why wouldn't the same person be able to carry a 70-200mm f2.8 Mark II zoom on a gripped 5D?

I have a pal who is an equestrian photographer and he'd shoot at events, selling the pictures to the competitors, so it is a case of shooting every rider for the duration of the event. ( something that would drive me nuts). He used a 1D + 70-200 2.8 and did eventually suffer from strained hand. The last time but one time I saw him he had it strapped up; the last time he was using a 7D + 70-200/4.

So size and weight can matter, it's a question of the individuals priorities and circumstances.

776
Lenses / Re: 85mm questions
« on: April 07, 2014, 02:42:24 PM »
I'll put my cards on the table; I'm a fan of the 85/1.8. It's great value and a thoroughly good performer despite the purple fringing that can occur when used wide open in very high contrast. In this situation you may have to stop down a little and correct in post.

There's not much on the radar for a revised version from either Sigma or Canon so you could be waiting a while.

For very tight head portraits the 135 field of view / distance is very worthwhile, but for more 'head 'n shoulder' composition consider more of an 85 fov / distance, so a fast 50 on aps would be good.

777
I think as the thread goes on and there is further analyses and explanations from the Op so the whole thing becomes less believable.

The pro was there to cover the wedding on a (presumably) professional supplier / customer basis and had kindly (strangely) allowed the OP to tag along, bringing his own camera.

When the bride was presented with the portfolio of shots it seems strange that she knew or assumed that this 'second' photographer who turned up with the hired pro, and 'ergo' was part of that 'togs team, did not have his pictures already included in that portfolio presented to her for perusal by the hired photographer. How was she made aware of the fact there was a completely different set of pictures that had not been included ?

778
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: April 07, 2014, 05:05:30 AM »

That is very kind of you.

There are some more at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smclaren/sets/72157634895659081/
That is a really spectacular collection. Thanks for sharing!

+1, thanks for putting the link up on CR. I had a look at the slideshow and they are all superb. The general standard of images on the 1Dx thread  is remarkable.

Were these shot on the Spey ? I had no idea there was so much Osprey activity there - judging from the different angles of the pictures I presume they are multiple catches.

779
I'd like 2-3 more C# settings.

me too!

How would you remember what they are ? I have trouble remembering 3 !

780
Reviews / Re: 35/2 IS Review by Dustin Abbott
« on: April 06, 2014, 02:39:11 PM »
Sharpness:
f/2 vs f/2.8 - They are very similiar wide open however the 35IS has more vignetting and softer corners
f/2.8 vs f/2.8 - The 35IS is sharper in the centre and mid-frame with the corners sharpness being similar. The vignetting also starts clearing up nicely by f/2.8.

Just out of curiosity from which source(s) of information did you draw these conclusions ?

One other thing I forgot to mention is that the 40 vignettes quite badly at 2.8 whereas at 2.8 on the 35 IS the vignette is much less.

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 145