« Last post by mrzero on Today at 04:33:41 PM »
The 8-15mm fisheye zoom also has one.
That's a pretty crappy caveat. I'd rather stick to some sort of filter on the front of the lens.
This is pretty useless for landscapes unless you want to NOT shoot at 11mm?
I really can't see someone taking their lens off when shooting out on the beach to put on a rear filter, thus exposing the lens and body to sea mist and sand.
I don't know anyone who uses the rear filter on the 17-40.
The rear filter only makes sense on fast portrait lenses where you know the filter needs to be on there all day long.
I really feel like Canon should have just made a 14-24 f2.8 lens that was better in every way to the Nikon. They got too ambitious with this lens.
I rented the old version a few times... but not sold on it
especially as it didnt do that good with my tamron sp pro 1.4x TC.
my devoted crow from a few days ago 5DmkIII, 560mm f8
seems a little soft...maybe off a tad...the 1.4TC isn't perfect...the $220 tamron versus the $100 one.
I HAVE NOT micro adjusted yet..but looks close.....