April 16, 2014, 01:12:51 AM

Author Topic: 70-300L or 100-400L  (Read 1238 times)

rcarca

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
  • Amateur, Enthusiast, Canonphile
    • View Profile
    • Flickr photostream
70-300L or 100-400L
« on: October 09, 2012, 10:14:18 AM »
I shoot with both a 7D and a 5DMkiii. I currently have a 70-300mm f4.5 - 5.6 DO IS USM, and am wondering if I should upgrade it to a 70-300mm f4.0 - 5.6 L IS USM or the 100 - 400mm. I have found the current lens a little soft on both bodies, certainly when compared to my 24-105L and even my 15-85 EFS.

The 100-400 has the attraction of an extra 100mm, but then it is a much older lens. My main use for this historically has been bird photography, and therefore it is better on the 7D. Can anyone comment?

Thanks

Richard
5DMkiii, 7D, loads of glass

canon rumors FORUM

70-300L or 100-400L
« on: October 09, 2012, 10:14:18 AM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • *******
  • Posts: 12721
    • View Profile
Re: 70-300L or 100-400L
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2012, 10:27:06 AM »
If you don't really need the extra 100mm, the 70-300mm L is the better lens.  If you do need the extra reach, the 100-400mm is the way to go.  For birds, you almost always need the reach.  I'd go with the 100-400mm. 

Most (but not all) of my shots in my Flickr Birds and Wildlife sets are with the 7D and 100-400mm (you'll see a couple with the 7D and 70-300 DO in there, too).
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 70-300L or 100-400L
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2012, 10:27:06 AM »