July 25, 2014, 12:30:53 PM

Author Topic: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM  (Read 38654 times)

Viggo

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1998
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #150 on: September 13, 2013, 01:26:05 AM »
I just sold my 35 L today, and no, I will not replace it with a siggy, I have something else in mind.  8)


Pray tell.  Zeiss 35 f/1.4 Distagon perhaps?

Nope, it was the 200 f2.0 L  :) and besides the fact the AF was pretty hopeless and it suddenly was full of sand and dust and the focusing ring made a grinding sound and it's now off on repair, it's the best lens by very far, I have ever used.
1dx, 24-70 L II, 50 Art, 200 f2.0 L

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #150 on: September 13, 2013, 01:26:05 AM »

GMCPhotographics

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
    • GMCPhotographics
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #151 on: September 13, 2013, 04:10:44 AM »
well , let us then  make a double blind test and you tell me which pictures comes  from Canon 35/1,4

Around here the Canon 35mm f/1.4 L costs 5,900 NIS, and the Sigma costs 3,600 NIS. so I could save ~40% and get the same image quality? Sweet...

Some will need the weather sealing, but others could use the different to buy another lens, say an EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.

The siggi and Canon 35 f1.4 are not the same and never will be. They have different renderings and bokeh. Colour and contrast are different too...as is flare control and AF competency. Get a Siggi 35mm on it's own merits, but don't kid your self it's a 35L clone, it's not. There is a beauty in the 35L which only comes out in the pictures it produces. Most skilled photographers who regularly use one fall in love with this lens for that very reason.

Hobby Shooter

  • Guest
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #152 on: September 14, 2013, 01:42:05 AM »
well , let us then  make a double blind test and you tell me which pictures comes  from Canon 35/1,4

Around here the Canon 35mm f/1.4 L costs 5,900 NIS, and the Sigma costs 3,600 NIS. so I could save ~40% and get the same image quality? Sweet...

Some will need the weather sealing, but others could use the different to buy another lens, say an EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.

The siggi and Canon 35 f1.4 are not the same and never will be. They have different renderings and bokeh. Colour and contrast are different too...as is flare control and AF competency. Get a Siggi 35mm on it's own merits, but don't kid your self it's a 35L clone, it's not. There is a beauty in the 35L which only comes out in the pictures it produces. Most skilled photographers who regularly use one fall in love with this lens for that very reason.
I am not very skilled but I still love my 35L. There's something about it.

AlanF

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 979
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #153 on: June 27, 2014, 05:40:19 PM »
9 months further on, are people still happy with the Sigma 35mm? I am thinking of buying one. 
5D III, 70D, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 150-600.

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4429
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #154 on: June 30, 2014, 01:29:13 PM »
9 months further on, are people still happy with the Sigma 35mm? I am thinking of buying one.

Honestly i havent used it at all since i got the 50... oh wait i havent taken the 50 off my 5dmk3 since i got it
oh except to attach to the sigma dock for calibration :)

its still a stunningly great lens but I'm just loving the 50 so much at the moment. I will get around to using the 35 again though. I did find the 35 a really nice 56mm equivalent on my EOS-M though too
APS-H Fanboy

AcutancePhotography

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 459
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #155 on: June 30, 2014, 01:54:27 PM »
9 months further on, are people still happy with the Sigma 35mm? I am thinking of buying one.

Very happy with it and have experienced no problems with the lens.
I shoot with a Camera Obscura with an optical device attached that refracts and transmits light

ScottyP

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #156 on: June 30, 2014, 03:11:08 PM »
My 35 lives on the camera.  It is insanely sharp, and the focus nails it every time.  I had been waiting for the 50 to come out, but I bought the 35 on sale at Christmas.  I am glad I waited.  It is a perfect length for general shooting, and I can always crop when I need to zoom. 
Canon 6D; Canon Lenses: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF 85 f/1.8; EF-S 17-55 f/2.8; Canon 1.4x Mk. III T.C.; Sigma Lens: 35mm f/1.4 "Art"

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #156 on: June 30, 2014, 03:11:08 PM »

AlanF

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 979
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #157 on: July 14, 2014, 04:04:16 PM »
The 35mm A arrived today. It required only +4 AFMA on the 5DIII and -2 on the 70D, by FoCal. The consistency of focus on both is 99.2%, which is better than any of my other lenses. It has a nice balance on the camera, has a an exactly fitting bayonet mount, and feels very well made. The first shots are very sharp. Downloaded the DxO module and it removed the vignetting at f/1.4 nicely. So far so good.
5D III, 70D, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 150-600.

AlanF

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 979
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #158 on: July 21, 2014, 10:15:30 AM »
The Sigma 35 is indeed very sharp. However, I tested it carefully against my old Canon 24-105 L at 35mm, using an iso 12233 chart. The 24-105 is sharper (at f/4 on both)! This is the second time the old workhorse has outshone the new pretenders (last time a Tamron 24-70 VC).

The Sigma 35 A is reported by Photozone and lenstip as having significantly superior MTFs to the 24-105. Either I have been unlucky with the Sigma and Tamron and getting poor copies or I have been very lucky and have a 24-105 which is an outlier in the right direction.
5D III, 70D, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 150-600.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM
« Reply #158 on: July 21, 2014, 10:15:30 AM »