August 21, 2014, 01:22:37 AM

Author Topic: IQ of 24-105 and 700-300 lenses  (Read 4999 times)

CharlieB

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: IQ of 24-105 and 700-300 lenses
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2012, 07:01:54 AM »
Here's my comparison -

24-105L

The 28/1.8 is hands down sharper with less CA at f/4
The 50/1.4 is the same at f/4
the 100/2.8USM (non-L) is the same and then some... at f/4

But I still find the 24-105L a good lens.... mostly because of its utility and the IS (even the older IS)

So there ya go.
What kind of comparison is that?

At f/4 the 24-105 is fully open. The 28/1.8 sucks fully open and so does the 50/1.4 ....

Well... its valid since I cannot shoot the 24-105 any wider than f/4.0.
You just get the option of wider stops with the three lenses I mentioned.

The point is, at f/4 the three non-L primes will out perform the 24-105.

And, that being said - I'll stick to my guns and say the 24-105 is a good lens, one I'm glad to have, and one that resides on a body... maybe 50 percent of the time.   When I don't know what to grab, I grab the 24-105 and I know I'll be ok.

Bias that with most of my shooting being lower light levels, "people pictures" of motorcycling events, no flash.  Even with f/4 the IS gets me keepers.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: IQ of 24-105 and 700-300 lenses
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2012, 07:01:54 AM »

bbasiaga

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
  • Canon Shooter
    • View Profile
Re: IQ of 24-105 and 700-300 lenses
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2012, 08:29:39 AM »
The 24-105, IMO, is one of those lenses that gets a bad rep just because so much stuff is repeated second hand on the internet.  The 'distortion' everyone talks about is there, but in most cases hardly noticeable and even then easily correctable with the excellent lens profiles availble in DPP and the Adobe products.  'Sharpness' is subjective, as what is sharp enough for one may not be for another.  Pixel peepers are often disappointed with gear that others are making excellent large quality prints with, so I tend to consider that fact when discussing sharpness.

I 'upgraded' to the 24-105 recenty from a 28-70 F2.8.  My old lens is in need of repair and I'm looking for a shop that still has parts.  In the mean time, i did not want to pay the current prices for a 24-70 F2.8 because they were in high demand and expensive even used.  The V II is way out of my range. 

I thought at the time i would be 'settling' for the slower lens, but it only took about 5 minutes after I put it on the camera to ask myself how I lived without the 24-105 for so long!  It is lighter and more versatile than the 2.8 lenses in the standard zoom range, and i find the IQ to be very similar.  With the newer bodies having higher ISO performance, I hardly if ever miss the extra stop of light.  Though, of course you can't recreate the F2.8 depth of field with an F4 lens at any ISO :)

In summary, the 24-105 is an excellent lens, particularly considering is versatility and weight. 

-Brian

canon rumors FORUM

Re: IQ of 24-105 and 700-300 lenses
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2012, 08:29:39 AM »