My 5D Mark III portraits

[Hill Benson]

Great shots florianbieler. You have managed to remove any doubts I had with regards to in IQ in terms of the Tamron 24-70.

Thanks for sharing.

[lucuias]

A selection of my best portraits since I own my 5D Mark III, which is for a little over three months now. Owned a 500D/Rebel T2i before, the difference is vast, I believe I don't need to tell you. You can find others on my website www.florianbieler.de or on facebook, if you got that.

Here we got some taken with the 100mm 2.8L:





Before that I owned the 100mm 2.8 non-L, also great for portraits.





The 70-200 4.0 non-L also makes a nice portrait lens, if space is available.



And these ones were taken with the Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC





I love that thing.

I like the 3rd image.That is amazing.I should try that sometimes.

[florianbieler.de]

Shot a new winter series last weekend with the 100L.


Linda X von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Linda IX von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Free at last von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Linda VIII von Florian Bieler auf Flickr

[bseitz234]

Excellent shots with the mk III.  Must be cold in the snowy winter.  Is it take her coat off for 3 minutes, grab some shots, then put the coat back on and heat up in the car?  Surely the model can only take so much.

Yup it works somehow like that. Actually it wasn't even That cold that day. Shot again today in the snow and fcuk it, THAT was cold. See results later. 

looking forward to those results!

[perperub]

Florian: I see in your signature that you do not longer have the Tamron 24-70/2.8. Is it so and if so, why? No good?

Pär

[florianbieler.de]

Florian: I see in your signature that you do not longer have the Tamron 24-70/2.8. Is it so and if so, why? No good?

Pär

Overall I was satisfied with the Tamron, but I also got a 17-40 now which is a more likeable lens for a hike or something because of the extra milimeters at the bottom. For portait I use 100L or 135L when I can and I always try to. I did not mount the Tamron that often and when I did, I used it mainly in lower focal ranges, I almost never use anything between 50 and 70mm.

Anyway, I am waiting for the new 50mm IS and when this releases, I would have sold the Tamron anyway. I got a 35mm IS for now and that is smaller, lighter and faster than the Tamron so it's probably going to be my hand-held-walkaround lens until or if an affordable 50 IS drops.

[joshbennett]

Those are great. Thanks for showing them.

[wickidwombat]

Florian: I see in your signature that you do not longer have the Tamron 24-70/2.8. Is it so and if so, why? No good?

Pär

Overall I was satisfied with the Tamron, but I also got a 17-40 now which is a more likeable lens for a hike or something because of the extra milimeters at the bottom. For portait I use 100L or 135L when I can and I always try to. I did not mount the Tamron that often and when I did, I used it mainly in lower focal ranges, I almost never use anything between 50 and 70mm.

Anyway, I am waiting for the new 50mm IS and when this releases, I would have sold the Tamron anyway. I got a 35mm IS for now and that is smaller, lighter and faster than the Tamron so it's probably going to be my hand-held-walkaround lens until or if an affordable 50 IS drops.

interested in seeing pics with the 35 IS i decided to go with the siggy 1.4 so far very happy with the decision as it is amazingly sharp but the 35 IS did look really nice too

[florianbieler.de]

Dropped the 35IS again... for a 50L which will probably be of more use to me regarding my portrait work. Gonna use it this weekend for the first time on a girl, be sure to check in for the results

[florianbieler.de]

Now a test run with my new 50L inside with no external lights used.


Black Swan von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia IV von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia III von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia II von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Claudia I von Florian Bieler auf Flickr