May 18, 2013, 06:45:47 AM

Author Topic: Takumars, Anyone?  (Read 5202 times)

scrappydog

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
    • View Profile
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2013, 12:31:38 PM »
Beautiful shot, Dustin.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2013, 12:31:38 PM »

florianbieler.de

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
    • florianbieler.de photography
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2013, 02:44:06 PM »
When you want to use a Takumar 50mm 1.4 SMC on a full frame, you'll run into the problem with the mirror hitting the back of the lens. You can mod the lens though, wrote a bit about that on my website www.florianbieler.de. Going to try the lens out as soon as my M42 adapter arrives.
5D Mark III · Walimex 14mm 2.8 · Sigma 35mm 1.4 · Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II · Canon 135mm 2.0L


Aglet

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
    • View Profile
    • A2B Art
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2013, 01:17:00 AM »
LOVE 'EM! :)
Just started playing with a small variety of old primes and a couple zooms in M42 on a crop body so no mirror-strike worries.
the super smooth feel, and every one has an interesting character that will lend itself to certain kinds of shots.
prices are rising tho, as everyone hops on board the oldies train.

favorite so far is also the SMC 50/1.8 but looking forward to trying a Mamiya that's still on its way to me.
Haven't take the Helios 44-2 outside yet.
Was quite surprised to see just how well the old SMC performs, very sharp, good contrast characteristics and nice bokeh.  I wonder if new Pentax glass performs as well?
-

Artifex

  • PowerShot G1 X
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #33 on: February 24, 2013, 01:24:53 PM »
I finally just bought the Helios 44-2! I was looking for one in perfect condition from a trusted seller, so it took me a while to choose. I'm definitely looking forward to try it! If anybody's interested, I could post test shots whenever I receive it (I guess the ride from Ukraine to Québec might take a while). Thanks for the great advices on previous posts!
« Last Edit: February 24, 2013, 02:39:47 PM by Artifex »
6D, 550D; Samyang 14mm f/2.8, SMC Pentax-M 28mm f/2.8, Samyang 35mm f/1.4, SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7, SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/4 Macro, Helios 44-2 58mm f/2, Canon 85mm f/1.8, Kenko Extension Tubes.

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 462
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #34 on: February 24, 2013, 02:23:36 PM »
I finally just bought the Helios 44-2! I was looking for one in perfect condition from a trusted seller, so it took me a while to choose. I'm definitely looking forward to try it! If anybody's interested, I could post test shots whenever I receive it (I guess the ride from Ukraine to Québec might that a while). Thanks for the great advices on previous posts!

Would love to see your shots.  It is a very unique lens.
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

dr croubie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1353
  • Too many photos, too little time.
    • View Profile
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2013, 10:05:53 PM »
I finally just bought the Helios 44-2! I was looking for one in perfect condition from a trusted seller, so it took me a while to choose. I'm definitely looking forward to try it! If anybody's interested, I could post test shots whenever I receive it (I guess the ride from Ukraine to Québec might that a while). Thanks for the great advices on previous posts!


Would love to see your shots.  It is a very unique lens.


I've also just picked up an MC Helios 44M-4, which should be sharper than the 44-2 according to the Zenit website (you don't have to read russian, just google translate, or look for the line "MC Гелиос-44М-4 — 41/20 линий/мм", which means MC Helios 44M-4 has 41 Line Pairs per mm in the centre, 20 on the edge, better than non-MC 44-2 at 38/20. And before anyone asks, the much-better 44-7 is rarer and more expensive).

So one day when I get time (in a few months, if that), I'll do a proper scientific comparison between my:
Takumar 55/2.0
Takumar 55/1.8
Takumar 50/1.4
FL 55/1.2
OM 50/2.5 Macro
MC Helios 44M-4
EF 50/1.8 II
EFs 15-85 @ 50mm
(maybe the Shorty Forty?)
(maybe Zeiss 50/4.0 in Pentacon Six? Or Mamiya645 45/2.8 C?)

But until then I'll just keep shooting in the real world and comparing them that way...
Too much gear, too little space.
Gear Photos

Artifex

  • PowerShot G1 X
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2013, 08:41:52 PM »
I finally got my Helios 44-2!  ;D
First impression: The lens is smaller and lighter that what I would have though. It is all made of metal and really feel solid. The focus ring is about 270°, allowing slower but more precise focusing. As strange as it might sound, it seems that the aperture values are put backward; at f/16, the aperture is wide open and at f/2, it is closed. I am quite happy to see that the lens itself is in perfect condition; barely any sign of use on the barrel, the glass elements are perfect, the aperture is smooth and oil-free. Although the lens is a bit less sharp than I excepted, though I haven't done any formal testing so I might be surprise later, the result it gives are stunning. It is reasonably sharp, the CA is reasonably well controlled, but the color and image rendition is unique and lovely. The bokeh is nothing short of amazing IMO. The photos I took with it really have a unique feel to them. To me, in a modern photographer bag, this lens is a wonderful tool. Of course, performance-wise, it is out-classed by modern standard lens (though I only have significant first-hand experience with the Sigma 50mm f/1.4), but I consider it more like a speciality lens, a bit like a fish-eye. It might not be your everyday use, walk-around lens, but it is definitely give unique image than no other lens I know can do.
Conclusion: Highly recommended!  :D
P.s: I attached a picture I took to show the unique bokeh rendition of the Helios 44-2. Not my best photo artisticly-wise, but still, I guess it make it point.
6D, 550D; Samyang 14mm f/2.8, SMC Pentax-M 28mm f/2.8, Samyang 35mm f/1.4, SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7, SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/4 Macro, Helios 44-2 58mm f/2, Canon 85mm f/1.8, Kenko Extension Tubes.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Takumars, Anyone?
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2013, 08:41:52 PM »