This is one messed up poll. Why would Canon not want to improve everything? All lenses sharper, better AF, better IS, etc, etc. What part would anybody not want inproved?
Well, if canon makes a f1.2 1mm-1200mm pancake with great IS, sharpness, and only costed around $100, then all the other lenses wouldn't be practical would they.
My point is will canon be nice and make everything better, or will canon make photographers compromise?
I know primes will always have a niche, but will canon introduce any benefits?
I think the problem with this logic is an assumption that "all" photographers are the same and none are happy. It's like say we've designed a new car for ALL males on the planet. Some males have no legs, some no hands, some are 3 feet tall some over 6 feet. There is always going to be compromise in design and development.
And the statement "make everything better" , again... blanket statements don't cut it. What's better for you is not necessarily better for me. With maybe one exception... Canon out of the kindness of their hearts decides that they won't charge for any products. The line starts to the right…
“…but will canon introduce any benefits?” Funny, I thought they have already introduced many benefits, might be why their doing pretty well in the camera buisness …
Not trying to troll here but your run of polls and questions might garner more constructive conversation if they were thought out a little better.