May 25, 2013, 09:24:44 PM

Author Topic: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM  (Read 38314 times)

ions

  • EOS M
  • ****
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
    • ions' flickr
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #60 on: December 24, 2012, 01:40:51 PM »
Gear: Canon EOS 7D | Canon EF-S 10-22 ƒ3.5-4.5 | Canon 24-70 ƒ2.8L | Canon 100 ƒ2.8L | Canon 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II | 420 EX | Tamrac Evolution 9 | Crumpler 8 MDH | Manfrotto 190QC, 804RC2 head.
flickr

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #60 on: December 24, 2012, 01:40:51 PM »

R1-7D

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #61 on: January 09, 2013, 10:01:28 PM »
Got this lens for Christmas! It's absolutely incredible.


E88A8361 by HadrianRobinson, on Flickr


E88A8363 by HadrianRobinson, on Flickr


E88A8347 by HadrianRobinson, on Flickr


E88A8366 by HadrianRobinson, on Flickr


E88A8403 by HadrianRobinson, on Flickr
Cameras: 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II. Lenses: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L, Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro, Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 Pancake, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Tokina SD 16-28MM f/2.8 FX

Flickr Page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hadrianrobinson/set

CanonGirl

  • PowerShot G15
  • **
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • LeeAlaniPix
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #62 on: January 09, 2013, 11:25:29 PM »
Some pictures taken with a Canon 5D Mark III & the 100mm f2.8L IS macro lens.  :-)






lundstrom.emil

  • PowerShot G15
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #63 on: January 31, 2013, 02:28:57 PM »

florianbieler.de

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • florianbieler.de photography
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #64 on: February 03, 2013, 04:07:46 PM »






5D Mark III · Walimex 14mm 2.8 · Sigma 35mm 1.4 · Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II · Canon 135mm 2.0L


florianbieler.de

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • florianbieler.de photography
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #65 on: February 23, 2013, 03:16:34 PM »
I mainly use the 135L now for portrait work but when it's a cold and wet weather like today, I pull out that weather isolated 100L and are also satisfied  ;D


Linda VIII von Florian Bieler auf Flickr
5D Mark III · Walimex 14mm 2.8 · Sigma 35mm 1.4 · Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II · Canon 135mm 2.0L


TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 482
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #66 on: February 23, 2013, 08:25:16 PM »
I mainly use the 135L now for portrait work but when it's a cold and wet weather like today, I pull out that weather isolated 100L and are also satisfied  ;D


Linda VIII von Florian Bieler auf Flickr


Two things - first, I don't think that the 100L has more weather sealing than the 135L but 2) I certainly can't argue with the result you got in this portrait.  Gorgeous!  I added you as a contact on Flickr.  I like using both of these lenses for portrait work as well, depending on how much operating room I have.
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #66 on: February 23, 2013, 08:25:16 PM »

Plamen

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
    • Math and Photography
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #67 on: February 23, 2013, 10:39:05 PM »

florianbieler.de

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • florianbieler.de photography
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #68 on: February 24, 2013, 01:57:34 AM »

Two things - first, I don't think that the 100L has more weather sealing than the 135L

Well then think again, the 100L is dust and water isolated while the 135L is not. So I would rather let it come down to it! It's clearly stated in the specsheets on Canon's official german website, strangely not on their english one, but just go ahead and google 100mm weather isolated and 135mm weather isolated.

Btw you can check your lens for weather sealing if you just look at the mount of it, when it has that small rubber ring around the mount it's isolated. I just compared my 135 and 100 and guess what I found...  ;D
« Last Edit: February 24, 2013, 01:59:59 AM by florianbieler.de »
5D Mark III · Walimex 14mm 2.8 · Sigma 35mm 1.4 · Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II · Canon 135mm 2.0L


TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 482
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #69 on: February 24, 2013, 08:45:25 AM »

Two things - first, I don't think that the 100L has more weather sealing than the 135L

Well then think again, the 100L is dust and water isolated while the 135L is not. So I would rather let it come down to it! It's clearly stated in the specsheets on Canon's official german website, strangely not on their english one, but just go ahead and google 100mm weather isolated and 135mm weather isolated.

Btw you can check your lens for weather sealing if you just look at the mount of it, when it has that small rubber ring around the mount it's isolated. I just compared my 135 and 100 and guess what I found...  ;D

You know what - I was sure there was a rubber gasket on the 135L, but I just checked mine and...no...there is not.  I was wrong....imagine that  ;D
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 482
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #70 on: February 24, 2013, 03:02:15 PM »
I love this lens, but it seems to me that it is optimized for closer range.  I don't find that it resolves like my 135L wide open in the 25-50 foot range.  The 100L is deadly up close, and makes a nice multipurpose prime stopped down a bit at distance, but I do find that I am somewhat underwhelmed at the detail wide open in the medium distance range. 

And yes, I have done the AFMA on my copy.

Anyone else have a similar experience?
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 482
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #71 on: February 24, 2013, 04:50:11 PM »
P.S. - It is almost like a I need a second AFMA for medium range.
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

Plamen

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
    • Math and Photography
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #72 on: February 24, 2013, 05:13:38 PM »
I love this lens, but it seems to me that it is optimized for closer range.  I don't find that it resolves like my 135L wide open in the 25-50 foot range.  The 100L is deadly up close, and makes a nice multipurpose prime stopped down a bit at distance, but I do find that I am somewhat underwhelmed at the detail wide open in the medium distance range. 

And yes, I have done the AFMA on my copy.

Anyone else have a similar experience?

My 135L is slightly better at f/2.8 (and much better at f/2  :) ) but it is a slight difference only. I just tested them outside - it is a cold but sunny day here - and I am satisfied with my 100L.

skitron

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 486
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #73 on: February 24, 2013, 10:26:23 PM »
P.S. - It is almost like a I need a second AFMA for medium range.

I've had fits with mine. The symptoms are you think you have AFMA set and you cannot get consistently sharp shots as telephoto. In fact they're rarely sharp and usually just enough off to be not quite right, with no zone of sharp focus (i.e. not a case where it just back or front focused). But interestingly it is not as much a problem using it as a macro. And when a tele shot works right, it has amazing IQ.

I finally isolated a 100% repeatable and quantifiable issue in testing. How I tested was setup tripod and test target, tether to EOS Utility, magnify 200% in EOS Utility. Then increment the focus single steps via the ">" and "<" buttons.

What I saw with my copy was that when changing the direction of focus (i.e. several ">" clicks and then a single "<" click or visa versa) the focus would change what looks like about 20 single clicks worth of going only a single direction. And not only that, the image would actually shift in the viewer frame. So something in the mechanical focus mechanism has some slop/play in it.

BTW, IS on/off doesn't make any difference in my case and I tested a friend's copy the same way and it did not exhibit this issue.

I sent it to Canon and paid over $200 and it came back the same way. I complained to them and did a video screen grab of the EOS Utility session and sent it back to them again. It should be here Tuesday and this time they took alot longer, so hopefully fixed this time.

I'll post more later this week...
5D3, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 200L II f/2.8, 100L, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, Rokinon 35/1.4, Canon TC 1.4x III

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 482
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #74 on: February 25, 2013, 07:56:20 AM »
P.S. - It is almost like a I need a second AFMA for medium range.

I've had fits with mine. The symptoms are you think you have AFMA set and you cannot get consistently sharp shots as telephoto. In fact they're rarely sharp and usually just enough off to be not quite right, with no zone of sharp focus (i.e. not a case where it just back or front focused). But interestingly it is not as much a problem using it as a macro. And when a tele shot works right, it has amazing IQ.

I finally isolated a 100% repeatable and quantifiable issue in testing. How I tested was setup tripod and test target, tether to EOS Utility, magnify 200% in EOS Utility. Then increment the focus single steps via the ">" and "<" buttons.

What I saw with my copy was that when changing the direction of focus (i.e. several ">" clicks and then a single "<" click or visa versa) the focus would change what looks like about 20 single clicks worth of going only a single direction. And not only that, the image would actually shift in the viewer frame. So something in the mechanical focus mechanism has some slop/play in it.

BTW, IS on/off doesn't make any difference in my case and I tested a friend's copy the same way and it did not exhibit this issue.

I sent it to Canon and paid over $200 and it came back the same way. I complained to them and did a video screen grab of the EOS Utility session and sent it back to them again. It should be here Tuesday and this time they took alot longer, so hopefully fixed this time.

I'll post more later this week...

Interesting. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
6D x 2 | 17-40L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« Reply #74 on: February 25, 2013, 07:56:20 AM »