Nikon has patented for a 16-35mm f/2.8 VR lens (VR of Nikon is the equivalent of the IS of Canon).Does Canon plan on making an equivalent of Nikon's recently patented lens?
It would be nice to have either 14-24 f2.8 IS or 16-35 f2.8 IS.....IS can be really useful for night time landscape.
Quote from: Dylan777 on January 11, 2013, 09:06:24 AMIt would be nice to have either 14-24 f2.8 IS or 16-35 f2.8 IS.....IS can be really useful for night time landscape.you better use a tripod for that.
Yes and it will be $6000
I for one would welcome a handheld UWA zoom from Canon that actually has sharp(er) corners.Frigging UWA zoom shopping is KILLING me.
Quote from: crasher8 on January 11, 2013, 11:11:36 AMI for one would welcome a handheld UWA zoom from Canon that actually has sharp(er) corners.Frigging UWA zoom shopping is KILLING me.Nothing, not even a yet to be conceived super-duper zoom, is going to make everyone perfectly content. They will be nitpicking something else with that. All things considered, current 16-35L II is a competent UWA.