February 01, 2015, 12:43:45 AM
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views  (Read 1581 times)

ScottyP

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
    • View Profile
Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« on: January 11, 2013, 01:45:52 AM »
The title of the previous Sigma 1.4 post was about pre-release.  Now The Digital Picture has given it its first unqualified reccomendation vs. the OEM product,
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-35mm-f-1.4-EX-DG-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx

and Lens Rentals has literally gushed over it..   http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/wide-angle/sigma-35mm-f1.4-dg-hsm-a1-for-canon
  What are we to think?
« Last Edit: January 11, 2013, 01:48:13 AM by ScottyP »
Logged
Canon 6D; Canon Lenses: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF 85 f/1.8; EF-S 17-55 f/2.8; Canon 1.4x Mk. III T.C.; Sigma Lens: 35mm f/1.4 "Art"

canon rumors FORUM

Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« on: January 11, 2013, 01:45:52 AM »

photogaz

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
    • Photogaz
Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2013, 02:24:13 AM »
Quote from: ScottyP on January 11, 2013, 01:45:52 AM
The title of the previous Sigma 1.4 post was about pre-release.  Now The Digital Picture has given it its first unqualified reccomendation vs. the OEM product,
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-35mm-f-1.4-EX-DG-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx

and Lens Rentals has literally gushed over it..   http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/wide-angle/sigma-35mm-f1.4-dg-hsm-a1-for-canon
  What are we to think?

There's something seriously wrong with the bokeh tests of the 35L.  I saw a post on here or maybe another forum of where somebody had the dots issue in the bokeh.  Turned out it was a faulty 35L.  Looks like they have the same issue.
Logged

EvilTed

  • Guest
Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2013, 02:47:12 AM »
"While it is not perfect, I'm finding the Sigma 35 to perform close to the Canon 35 L in AF accuracy. A somewhat consistent and quite noticeable front focus problem on both of my 5D Mark III bodies required AFMA to correct. You may want to capture multiple images in situations with especially shallow DOF - which will be closer to MFD (Minimum Focus Distance). Note that the focus-and-recompose technique can begin to fail as shallower DOF is achieved. "

This is what I encountered with my copy, so I returned it.
Big PITA to get many shots in focus at F/1.4, probably worse than the Canon 50 F/1.2L.

It's a great sharp lens when you get a keeper.
It probably needs adjustment and practice to get them...

ET
Logged

Quasimodo

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 971
  • Easily intrigued :)
    • View Profile
    • 500px.com
Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2013, 03:10:43 AM »
Now it is only Photozone still dragging their feet of the big ones.

Btw: I love what I am seeing from my copy so far :)
Logged
1Dx, 5x600 EX RT, ST-E3Canon:16-35L II,  24-105L , 70-200L IS II, 135L, 100L, 2x III TC, EF 25II, 40 F2.8 STM, Sigma 35 F1.4 Art, Sigma 50 F1.4 Art, Sigma 85 F1.4.
Canon A-1, 199A, FD: 24/2.8, 35/2.0, 100/2.8, Vivitar 400/5.6 Mamiya RZ67 pro ii, 50,110,180
www.500px.com/gerhard1972

Quasimodo

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 971
  • Easily intrigued :)
    • View Profile
    • 500px.com
Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2013, 03:24:42 AM »
And it looks like we are still in for a wait...... :(


http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/2874-lens-tests-on-the-horizon/
Logged
1Dx, 5x600 EX RT, ST-E3Canon:16-35L II,  24-105L , 70-200L IS II, 135L, 100L, 2x III TC, EF 25II, 40 F2.8 STM, Sigma 35 F1.4 Art, Sigma 50 F1.4 Art, Sigma 85 F1.4.
Canon A-1, 199A, FD: 24/2.8, 35/2.0, 100/2.8, Vivitar 400/5.6 Mamiya RZ67 pro ii, 50,110,180
www.500px.com/gerhard1972

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 POST-RELEASE hands-on views
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2013, 03:24:42 AM »
Pages: [1]
« previous next »