March 05, 2015, 05:53:46 PM

Author Topic: Show your Bird Portraits  (Read 1049309 times)

Jack Douglas

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1112
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2340 on: August 21, 2013, 06:27:37 PM »
This might seem dumb but I'm new to all this and don't fully understand the terminology relative to cropping percentages.  DPP has 50%, which seems to double the subject height, for example??

AlanF says 100% crop meaning??  You get the gist of my uncertainty, someone please fill me in on the normal way of describing cropping.

Jack
6D  24-70 F4  70-200 F2.8 II  300 F2.8 II  1.4X III  2X III

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2340 on: August 21, 2013, 06:27:37 PM »

serendipidy

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1398
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2341 on: August 21, 2013, 06:41:05 PM »
This might seem dumb but I'm new to all this and don't fully understand the terminology relative to cropping percentages.  DPP has 50%, which seems to double the subject height, for example??

AlanF says 100% crop meaning??  You get the gist of my uncertainty, someone please fill me in on the normal way of describing cropping.

Jack

Thanks for asking that. I don't understand crop percentages either.
EOS 5D miii, EOS 7D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS ii, 100-400mmL IS

Click

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4072
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2342 on: August 21, 2013, 07:03:55 PM »
Egret-  I have already fixed the watermark, but haven't removed it from this one.

Very nice picture Scott. Well done.

scottkinfw

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 804
    • View Profile
    • kasden.smug.com
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2343 on: August 21, 2013, 10:00:53 PM »
Wow, thank you, that means a lot.

sek
sek Cameras: 5D III, 5D II, EOS M  Lenses:  24-70 2.8 II IS, 24-105 f4L, 70-200 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, EF 300 f4L IS, EF 400 5.6L, 300 2.8 IS II, Samyang 14 mm 2.8 Flashes: 600EX-RT X 2, ST-E3-RT
Plus lots of stuff that just didn't work for me

Omar H

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2344 on: August 21, 2013, 10:38:56 PM »
... and Peter (Pan) was there chasing his shadow...


Colibri by Omar H, on Flickr

rpt

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2410
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2345 on: August 21, 2013, 10:41:17 PM »
This might seem dumb but I'm new to all this and don't fully understand the terminology relative to cropping percentages.  DPP has 50%, which seems to double the subject height, for example??

AlanF says 100% crop meaning??  You get the gist of my uncertainty, someone please fill me in on the normal way of describing cropping.

Jack

Thanks for asking that. I don't understand crop percentages either.
My understanding of 100% crop is that:
  • it is a cropped image
  • when rendered either on the website or on your computer after a download, the image does not get resized

Because (and my English teacher would kill me for starting the sentence with the word "because") cropping an image to 100% of its size makes no sense to me :)

rpt

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2410
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2346 on: August 21, 2013, 10:42:09 PM »
... and Peter (Pan) was there chasing his shadow...


Colibri by Omar H, on Flickr
Lovely capture Omar!

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2346 on: August 21, 2013, 10:42:09 PM »

AlanF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1295
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2347 on: August 21, 2013, 10:50:16 PM »
This might seem dumb but I'm new to all this and don't fully understand the terminology relative to cropping percentages.  DPP has 50%, which seems to double the subject height, for example??

AlanF says 100% crop meaning??  You get the gist of my uncertainty, someone please fill me in on the normal way of describing cropping.

Jack

Thanks for asking that. I don't understand crop percentages either.

100% crop means that you take a part of the original and do not enlarge or reduce the number of pixels in it. Eg, the upper kingfisher is 1075x776 pixels, which when described as 100% crop means that it was a rectangle of 1075x776 pixels in the original image. 
5D III, 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, 100-400 II, Sigma 10-20, EOS-M 18-55, f/2 22.

Jack Douglas

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1112
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2348 on: August 22, 2013, 01:32:29 AM »
OK, I think I understand what AlanF has described but it doesn't seem overly useful in telling me what percentage of the original frame the displayed portion is.

For illustration here is a shot that was RAW 5472 X 3648 and 23815 KB.  I cropped the bird as shown and it indicated 3041 X 1733.  If I posted it as 3041 X 1733, which is likely too large, is that a 100% crop?  What is it as posted, 1520 X 867?

It seems to me it would be more userful or interesting to have an idea how this filled the original frame, no?

Jack
6D  24-70 F4  70-200 F2.8 II  300 F2.8 II  1.4X III  2X III

AlanF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1295
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2349 on: August 22, 2013, 03:28:47 AM »
Jack
If you state that the image is a 100% crop and the camera on which it is taken, then anyone can work out the fraction of the frame that is displayed as you can look up the megapixel size of the sensor. If you arbitrarily reduce the size and don't state by how much then the viewer can't work anything out.  So, I would argue that stating it is a 100% crop and the camera gives you more information, not less. Most images are posted without any indication of the crop size.

Also, by knowing it is a 100% crop you can immediately judge the quality of the original image, which again is informative.
5D III, 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, 100-400 II, Sigma 10-20, EOS-M 18-55, f/2 22.

Click

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4072
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2350 on: August 22, 2013, 06:01:19 AM »
... and Peter (Pan) was there chasing his shadow...

Interesting shot.  8) Nicely done.

AlanF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1295
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2351 on: August 22, 2013, 06:08:19 AM »
Faster than a speeding bullet! More powerful than a locomotive! Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound! Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's Superkingfisher!

This is a 740x855 100% crop from a Canon 7D. As a percentage of the original it is (740x855/(5184x3456))x100% = 3.53%

I always leave the Exif data on the image so you can download it and get all the info.
5D III, 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, 100-400 II, Sigma 10-20, EOS-M 18-55, f/2 22.

GaryJ

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 85
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2352 on: August 22, 2013, 06:57:03 AM »
a recent entry in my clubs monthly comp.
7D,6D,100mmL IS f2.8 Macro,70-300mm L,MPE-65, 24-105 f4 L,50mm f1.8,70-200mm L f4,Siggy 150mmf2.8 Macro, Tokina 11-16mm Kenko Extenders and 1.4 TC [for 70-300] 40mm f2.8 STM

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2352 on: August 22, 2013, 06:57:03 AM »

scottkinfw

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 804
    • View Profile
    • kasden.smug.com
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2353 on: August 22, 2013, 07:00:51 AM »
Please take this the right way!

Looking at this pic I absolutely love it and appreciate it (I try many times myself for bird shots).  Breaking it down technically, it is imperfect in its pieces.  However, looking past that, the picture as a whole grabs me in and I totally love it.  An example where the technical isn't as important as the artistic gestalt.  I wouldn't change a thing- Excellent!
sek Cameras: 5D III, 5D II, EOS M  Lenses:  24-70 2.8 II IS, 24-105 f4L, 70-200 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, EF 300 f4L IS, EF 400 5.6L, 300 2.8 IS II, Samyang 14 mm 2.8 Flashes: 600EX-RT X 2, ST-E3-RT
Plus lots of stuff that just didn't work for me

AlanF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1295
    • View Profile
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2354 on: August 22, 2013, 08:10:23 AM »
Please take this the right way!

Looking at this pic I absolutely love it and appreciate it (I try many times myself for bird shots).  Breaking it down technically, it is imperfect in its pieces.  However, looking past that, the picture as a whole grabs me in and I totally love it.  An example where the technical isn't as important as the artistic gestalt.  I wouldn't change a thing- Excellent!

To which photo are you referring?
5D III, 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, 100-400 II, Sigma 10-20, EOS-M 18-55, f/2 22.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #2354 on: August 22, 2013, 08:10:23 AM »