October 22, 2017, 06:59:36 PM

Author Topic: Show your Bird Portraits  (Read 3979510 times)

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14610 on: October 12, 2017, 11:20:19 PM »
Nice series, Alan.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14610 on: October 12, 2017, 11:20:19 PM »

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14611 on: October 12, 2017, 11:21:06 PM »
Kingfisher and heron from recent beach trip. The Kingfisher only landed on the top of boat moorings, so not a great natural environment shot. 5DMKIV, 600II + 1.4XIII, ISO1250, f6.3, 1/200.

Very nice shots. I especially like the second one.

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14612 on: October 12, 2017, 11:22:11 PM »
Personally I'd prefer just one bird thread but no matter, other than I need to call these shots birds in landing BIL so Alan doesn't get on my case! ;)

Focus as usual not quite what I'd prefer.

Jack

Nice pictures, Jack.   :)

Jack Douglas

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4560
  • http://www.gohaidagwaii.ca/blog/eagle-photography-
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14613 on: October 12, 2017, 11:35:58 PM »
Thanks click and Graham.  The Northern flickers are starting to show up more often now.  There are literally dozens of juncos and the robins are everywhere feeding on berries before heading south.

Correction, this is the Red-shafted version.  Not sure why the shafts are not very red!

Jack
« Last Edit: October 13, 2017, 12:37:51 AM by Jack Douglas »
1DX2   11-24 F4   24-70 F4   70-200 F2.8 II   300 F2.8 II   1.4X III   2X III   400 DO F4 II 

http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/profile/647784/

AlanF

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3063
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14614 on: October 13, 2017, 02:57:27 AM »
Nice shots Jack.
5D IV, 5DS R, 400mm DO II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, EF 1.8 STM,  EF 24-105, 100-400 II, EF-S 15-85, Sigma 150-600mm C, EOS-M5 15-45, f/2 22, 11-22, Samyang 8mm f/2.8 fisheye: sold 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot G3 X,  Sigma 10-20, EF 300/2.8 II, 70-200/4 IS.

AlanF

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3063
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14615 on: October 13, 2017, 03:08:20 AM »
Hi Alan.
Some very nice crops there, having more pixels on the target can never be bad can it?
I understand the tradeoff with speed, ISO vs file size, but don't focal length limited photographers appreciate pixels on the target?

Cheers, Graham.

We most certainly do appreciate more pixels, which is why I appreciate the 5DSR so much! There is a lot of talk about upgrading the 5DSR, but the current model is good enough for me.
5D IV, 5DS R, 400mm DO II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, EF 1.8 STM,  EF 24-105, 100-400 II, EF-S 15-85, Sigma 150-600mm C, EOS-M5 15-45, f/2 22, 11-22, Samyang 8mm f/2.8 fisheye: sold 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot G3 X,  Sigma 10-20, EF 300/2.8 II, 70-200/4 IS.

AlanF

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3063
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14616 on: October 13, 2017, 03:55:55 AM »
Jack, I see you are using 560mm. Because you are close or just easier to handle? They look plenty sharp to me.
5D IV, 5DS R, 400mm DO II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, EF 1.8 STM,  EF 24-105, 100-400 II, EF-S 15-85, Sigma 150-600mm C, EOS-M5 15-45, f/2 22, 11-22, Samyang 8mm f/2.8 fisheye: sold 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot G3 X,  Sigma 10-20, EF 300/2.8 II, 70-200/4 IS.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14616 on: October 13, 2017, 03:55:55 AM »

Vern

  • EOS 6D Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 369
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14617 on: October 13, 2017, 10:03:25 AM »
Hi Vern.
Very nice shots, so if we provide a perch with less obstructions / better visibility is the kingfisher wrong to use it?  :)
That heron looks like it got a good lunch! 

Cheers, Graham.

Kingfisher and heron from recent beach trip. The Kingfisher only landed on the top of boat moorings, so not a great natural environment shot. 5DMKIV, 600II + 1.4XIII, ISO1250, f6.3, 1/200.

Hi Graham - yes, the bird clearly knows where to sit to catch his dinner and was uninterested in my desire for a 'natural' shot. I did try to set-up and catch him flying b/t perches, but this task was well beyond my skill and the AF abilities of the 5DMKIV (mostly me though, to be honest). If I had the chance again, I think I'd try handholding with just the 600 - or maybe a monopod.
1Dx I, 5DSR, 5DMK IV, 600 II, 300 II, 200 f2, 85 1.2 II, 100 2.8 IS, 24TS II, 70-200 II, 24-70 II, 16-35 III, 100-400 II, 11-24

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14618 on: October 13, 2017, 10:04:22 AM »
Very nice shot, Jack.  :)

Jack Douglas

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4560
  • http://www.gohaidagwaii.ca/blog/eagle-photography-
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14619 on: October 13, 2017, 10:59:04 AM »
Thanks guys.

Alan, there is definitely a reduction of AF capability going 800 if the light is marginal (back-lighting) and yes if I hope get a moving bird in the frame at close distance I need a looser frame.  That's where your extra pixels come in handy.  560 beats my old 600 wrt AF.  400 is a killer for AF but it's 400, again cropping can help there as you know when you have the extra pixels. 

For my needs 24-28 MP and 12 fps would have been much more ideal but 14fps is pretty addictive relative to stationary birds with subtle movements that produce different instantaneous poses.  In that sense it serves a function not unlike cropping after the fact.  Not sure if I posted this shot before but it illustrates that out of a long string of modest bursts only one had flying wood.

Jack
« Last Edit: October 13, 2017, 11:25:04 AM by Jack Douglas »
1DX2   11-24 F4   24-70 F4   70-200 F2.8 II   300 F2.8 II   1.4X III   2X III   400 DO F4 II 

http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/profile/647784/

dpc

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3733
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14620 on: October 13, 2017, 11:55:07 AM »
Thanks click and Graham.  The Northern flickers are starting to show up more often now.  There are literally dozens of juncos and the robins are everywhere feeding on berries before heading south.

Correction, this is the Red-shafted version.  Not sure why the shafts are not very red!

Jack


Nice portrait, Jack!  :)

dpc

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3733
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14621 on: October 13, 2017, 11:58:54 AM »
Blackbird on my lawn two days ago. He was solo. They often come in flocks. He wasn't terribly nervous with me being around, either. I was able to walk reasonably close.  8)

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14622 on: October 13, 2017, 02:09:23 PM »
For my needs 24-28 MP and 12 fps would have been much more ideal but 14fps is pretty addictive relative to stationary birds with subtle movements that produce different instantaneous poses.  In that sense it serves a function not unlike cropping after the fact.  Not sure if I posted this shot before but it illustrates that out of a long string of modest bursts only one had flying wood.

Jack

That's a very nice shot, Jack.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14622 on: October 13, 2017, 02:09:23 PM »

Click

  • Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS
  • *
  • Posts: 9289
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14623 on: October 13, 2017, 02:10:15 PM »
Blackbird on my lawn two days ago. He was solo. They often come in flocks. He wasn't terribly nervous with me being around, either. I was able to walk reasonably close.  8)

Very nice series, series, dpc. I especially like the 3rd picture.

Well done.

AlanF

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 3063
Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14624 on: October 13, 2017, 02:45:14 PM »
Thanks guys.

Alan, there is definitely a reduction of AF capability going 800 if the light is marginal (back-lighting) and yes if I hope get a moving bird in the frame at close distance I need a looser frame.  That's where your extra pixels come in handy.  560 beats my old 600 wrt AF.  400 is a killer for AF but it's 400, again cropping can help there as you know when you have the extra pixels. 

For my needs 24-28 MP and 12 fps would have been much more ideal but 14fps is pretty addictive relative to stationary birds with subtle movements that produce different instantaneous poses.  In that sense it serves a function not unlike cropping after the fact.  Not sure if I posted this shot before but it illustrates that out of a long string of modest bursts only one had flying wood.

Jack

That's nothing Jack.  Look at my Canadian Northern Flicker taken in Halifax NS.
5D IV, 5DS R, 400mm DO II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, EF 1.8 STM,  EF 24-105, 100-400 II, EF-S 15-85, Sigma 150-600mm C, EOS-M5 15-45, f/2 22, 11-22, Samyang 8mm f/2.8 fisheye: sold 7D II, EOS-M, Powershot G3 X,  Sigma 10-20, EF 300/2.8 II, 70-200/4 IS.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« Reply #14624 on: October 13, 2017, 02:45:14 PM »