I'm new to the forums here, so greetings. Ive enjoyed the discussions here quite a bit and wanted to toss this question out to the group.
I was able to pick up a 5D Mark II + 24-105 bundle when Fry's was clearing them out ($2100).
To this point, I shoot crop (T4i, 17-55), and I do have some lenses that are compatible with FF, so lenses are not a factor. I shoot family, kids, street/photojounalism, and a bit of landscape. No birding, no high speed sports. I post-process in Lightroom.
However, I'm grappling with the debate of whether to 1) keep the 5D II as an introduction to FF, or 2) return it and go 6D, OR 3) return it, wait a while, and then go 5D III.
I understand the spec differences between all three bodies, and the capabilities and limitations of all.
What are your thoughts? Will the 5DII provide an IQ experience different from my T4i? (notwithstanding focal differences, which I understand).
Would you, in this situation, be disappointed in the limitations of the 5DII?
Is the cost of investment in the 5DII at this time better leveraged with the 6D/5D III?
Thanks for reading. I'm well within my return period, so I just want ensure I'm making the most rational decisions of whether to keep or change my strategy.