Canon EOS 100D Detailed Specs Appear

[Stuart]

Place holder specs :-
Focus Range   9.8′ – infinity - that's got to be a mistake 9.8 feet?   They must mean inches "

[melbournite]

Count me as someone else going against the flow here. I also own the 5D2 and 5D3 and coincidentally, I too have sold my 7D (and am eagerly awaiting the 7D2!).

lol, I too am waiting for the 7D2.

[dilbert]

Maybe it is Canon EOS-M 100D?

Or something similar?

Is this the "top of the range" EOS-M camera that was expected later in the year?

If so, would that mean that "EOS xxD" will end after "EOS 90D"?
Or would they double up and have "EOS 100D" and "EOS-M 100D"?

[M.ST]

There are a lot of rumored names for the new small EOS bodys.

A guy from Canon told me today, that the name "EOS B" is possible.

It sound realistic to me, because the small EOS bodys are a new product line. But we will see at the 22th.

But I want a camera between the 5D Mark III and 1D X, a new EF 80-400 IS L, a 12-24 2.8 L oder a 16-35 2.8 III, a 7D Mark II with CF card slot to replace the TC´s, a better build EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS and a lot more. And the EF 17-40 L from 2003 needs a replacement too.

[akiskev]

650d: 133 x 100 x 79 mm
100d: 117 x  91 x 69 mm

ok it is smaller we get it!

[Sith Zombie]

An 18 MP APS-C sensor.  I'm shocked, really shocked. I didn't even know Canon had an 18 MP APS-C sensor, and yet here it is. Wow. Just...wow.

 

Welcome to the future! I'm excited too, I love the way Canon put entirely new sensors into each and everyone of their bodies, thats why I own the 7D, 60D, Eos M and a couple of rebels. The results are different for each camera I use!

[Isurus]

If I wanted a body this small I'd invest in a m4/3 mirrorless system instead.  When I think of wanting something more compact, I think of both the body AND the lenses.  A super small body will be really unbalanced when you add larger lenses to it, even EF-S.  Pricing is kind of out there too.  Meh.

[Vivid Color]

650d: 133 x 100 x 79 mm
100d: 117 x  91 x 69 mm

ok it is smaller we get it!

For additional comparison purposes, here's the size of Canon's T1i (500D): 128.8 x 97.5 x 61.9mm
And the XT (350D): 126.5 x 94.2 x 64mm
All data are from the Canon website.

[moreorless]

If I wanted a body this small I'd invest in a m4/3 mirrorless system instead.  When I think of wanting something more compact, I think of both the body AND the lenses.  A super small body will be really unbalanced when you add larger lenses to it, even EF-S.  Pricing is kind of out there too.  Meh.

I think it makes more sense when you consider it agenst m43, you want a body with an SLR form factor and an EVF and your paying a significant amount more than this.

It also of course offers an option to existing EF/EF-S lens users looking for a smaller second camera with the same mount.

We don't of course know what kind of lens support Canon might offer in the future, maybe a powered zoom or a wider pancake?

[facedodge]

There are a lot of rumored names for the new small EOS bodys.

A guy from Canon told me today, that the name "EOS B" is possible.

It sound realistic to me, because the small EOS bodys are a new product line. But we will see at the 22th.

But I want a camera between the 5D Mark III and 1D X, a new EF 80-400 IS L, a 12-24 2.8 L oder a 16-35 2.8 III, a 7D Mark II with CF card slot to replace the TC´s, a better build EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS and a lot more. And the EF 17-40 L from 2003 needs a replacement too.

What do you do that you need 3 wide angle zooms with mostly overlapping focal lengths?

[skfla]

If canon made a 30mm pancake, with the crop factor the 40mm is nice but not really that useful for me, then I might be interested whenever the price on this camera drops SIGNIFICANTLY.

But to me, this is further proof that someone in purchasing/manufacturing made a big goof a few years ago.  When they were ordering the 18 mp sensors, someone put in one or two too many zeros.  And BAM, they ended up with a 100 million of the things sitting in a warehouse somewhere.  & ever since, they've been sitting around thinking "...NOW what kind of camera can we make to unload a few more of these damn things??"

[brianboru]

My wife bought a T4i two weeks ago and is thrilled.  A good part of that happiness is the touch screen which does a very nice job of creating a unified user interface for someone starting out.   She commented that our 7D and 40D were intimidating in the past when she has tried to learn how to use them.

I see the rumored 100D being a nice addition to the entry market:

• T4i - biggest with a pivot screen that is handy for video.
• 100D - smaller and lighter but still with fast focusing for photos.
• M - really small at the loss of focus speed.

Obviously the three cameras have almost identical internals and that the difference is in the form.     If the rumored 100D were available two weeks ago I think it might have won out over the T4i for my wife.

All of these cameras are answers to someone considering a micro4/3 camera but who likes the idea of getting into a lens-lineup that can grow with them in the future.

[ssrdd]

Again same stupid 18mp sensor. W T F canon?

[killswitch]

Just saw a post in CanonPriceWatch Facebook page where Best Buy accidentally uploaded links to so called rumored 18mp body that is supposed to be announced in a few days time. Don't know how accurate this is but CPW has a screenshot of the page and the name of the body is Canon "EOS-b"!  Typo?

[J.R.]

Just saw a post in CanonPriceWatch Facebook page where Best Buy accidentally uploaded links to so called rumored 18mp body that is supposed to be announced in a few days time. Don't know how accurate this is but CPW has a screenshot of the page and the name of the body is Canon "EOS-b"!  Typo?

EOS-B(ULL)!!!