November 23, 2014, 04:17:13 PM

Author Topic: 100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?  (Read 968 times)

Cory

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 248
    • View Profile
100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »
     I have the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 for indoor volleyball and other stuff, but am teetering on considering selling them for a single 70-200 2.8 non-IS.  My other lens is the tremendous Sigma 17-50 so the zoom would have the same filter size (polarizing, etc.). 
     I really like the image quality from the primes and the smaller size is a bonus, but keep coming back to the zoom.  Would I take a hit in image quality?  If even a little I'll likely stick with the primes. 
     Thanks for any insight.
70D, 10-18, 35 2.0 IS, 100 2.0 and 200 2.8II, 70-300L
EOS M/22 2.0
430EXII

canon rumors FORUM

100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »