December 08, 2016, 07:30:19 AM

Author Topic: 100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?  (Read 1463 times)

Cory

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 379
    • Cory Steiner Photography
100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »
     I have the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 for indoor volleyball and other stuff, but am teetering on considering selling them for a single 70-200 2.8 non-IS.  My other lens is the tremendous Sigma 17-50 so the zoom would have the same filter size (polarizing, etc.). 
     I really like the image quality from the primes and the smaller size is a bonus, but keep coming back to the zoom.  Would I take a hit in image quality?  If even a little I'll likely stick with the primes. 
     Thanks for any insight.
70D, Tokina 11-16 II, 35 2.0 IS, 85 1.8 and 200 2.8II
430EXII, Induro AT113/Sirui K-20x
https://www.facebook.com/corysteinerphotography/

canon rumors FORUM

100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »