October 23, 2017, 07:28:04 AM

Author Topic: 100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?  (Read 1605 times)

Cory

  • EOS 7D Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 469
    • Cory Steiner Photography
100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »
     I have the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 for indoor volleyball and other stuff, but am teetering on considering selling them for a single 70-200 2.8 non-IS.  My other lens is the tremendous Sigma 17-50 so the zoom would have the same filter size (polarizing, etc.). 
     I really like the image quality from the primes and the smaller size is a bonus, but keep coming back to the zoom.  Would I take a hit in image quality?  If even a little I'll likely stick with the primes. 
     Thanks for any insight.
6D, 16-35 4.0 IS, 40, 135 2.0
430EXII, Induro AT113/Sirui K-20x, Sirui T-025x
https://www.twenty20.com/corsteiner/photos

canon rumors FORUM

100 + 200 vs 70-200 2.8 non-IS?
« on: April 02, 2013, 10:45:22 AM »