July 28, 2014, 07:12:54 PM

Author Topic: Zeiss vs Canon  (Read 1732 times)

Pixel

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Zeiss vs Canon
« on: April 24, 2013, 07:52:04 PM »
Anybody have any side by side comparisons of Zeiss lenses against Canon?
I'm mostly looking for Zeiss 15mm 2.8 to anything wide made by Canon.

canon rumors FORUM

Zeiss vs Canon
« on: April 24, 2013, 07:52:04 PM »

ksagomonyants

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 189
    • View Profile
Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2013, 09:47:06 PM »
I don't use any ultra-wide lenses but this may be a good article which compares Zeiss 15 f2.8 with one of the best Canon's lens – 17mm f4 TS. http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1207619. I think Canon's TS has superb built quality and corner-to-corner sharpness, and of course tilt-shift capabilities. Zeiss probably isn't as sharp at corners but some people note a special Zeiss microcontrast.

According to Ken Rockwell, Zeiss 15 f2.8 is much better as compared to other ultrawide Canon lenses, such as EF 14mm f2.8. Lloyd Chambers says Zeiss 15mm f2.8 has exceptional contrast, exceptionally low distortions, high resistance to glare, absence of chromatic aberrations, and in general delivers a better image quality than Nikon 14-24.

Overall, Zeiss 15mm f2.8 seems to be an amazing performer. Is there a particular Canon lens you're comparing it with?

RLPhoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3287
  • Gear doesn't matter, Just a Matter of Convenience.
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2013, 11:00:09 PM »
If zeiss made AF optics in EF mount, I'd own no canon lenses.

Mr Bean

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 355
    • View Profile
Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2013, 11:01:19 PM »
From an edge to edge sharpness, the Zeiss 15mm wins hands down, compared to Canon's equivalents (excluding the TS range). The TS lenses from Canon are probably on par with the Zeiss. But, they are designed with a much larger image circle, to account for the shift that the lens can do (think of a FF lens on a small sensor).

For my testing (and I realise it's not perfect) I simply hired a few lenses and took some shots of the stars, which quickly sorted out which had coma or not (coma creates edge softness in a lens, not really correctable in PS or Lightroom). For example, the Canon 24mm f1.4 is a beaut lens, in the center, but soft around the edges. Point it towards the stars and you will see why :)

That said, it'll depend on what the lens is intended for. Are you wanting wide open usage, or can to stop the lens down a bit?
5D mk3 with grip, 300 f4 L, 100 IS Macro L, 50 f1.4, 50 f1.8, 40 f2.8 pancake, 35 f2, 1.4x TC III, Zeiss 15mm f2.8, 24 f1.4 L
580EX II, MT-24EX Macro Flash
EF 12mm and 25mm II Extension tubes

Mr Bean

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 355
    • View Profile
Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2013, 11:10:55 PM »
If zeiss made AF optics in EF mount, I'd own no canon lenses.
Same here. 6 months ago, I was a one eyed Canon-ite.....until I made the mistake of using a 21mm Zeiss lens ;)
5D mk3 with grip, 300 f4 L, 100 IS Macro L, 50 f1.4, 50 f1.8, 40 f2.8 pancake, 35 f2, 1.4x TC III, Zeiss 15mm f2.8, 24 f1.4 L
580EX II, MT-24EX Macro Flash
EF 12mm and 25mm II Extension tubes

RGF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1231
  • How you relate to the issue, is the issue.
    • View Profile
Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2013, 11:08:23 PM »
Too bad Canon does not license their AF controls (electronic  signals) so that the Zeiss lenses can autofocus.

Win win situation.  best glass (consumters), royality payments to Canon (reduce development costs), clobber Nikon on wide angles

if only ...  to bad wished don't often come true

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Zeiss vs Canon
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2013, 11:08:23 PM »