July 31, 2014, 06:33:56 PM

Author Topic: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens  (Read 4652 times)

cfcis99

  • SX50 HS
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« on: May 14, 2013, 08:15:18 AM »
Hi,
I was thinking of buying the 24-70mm ver 2 and it around 90K CMPI. With that amount of money, I can already buy 3 prime lens (non-L).
I want to know how others think, will you go for the ver 2 or 3 prime lens w/c are sharper and faster?

Prime Lens:
EF 35mm F2 IS USM
EF 50mm F1.4 USM
EF 100mm F2 USM

vs.
EF 24-70mm F2.8 USM ver 2

thanks

canon rumors FORUM

EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« on: May 14, 2013, 08:15:18 AM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ********
  • Posts: 13619
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2013, 10:18:17 AM »
The 24-70 II is sharper.  The primes have wider apertures, and one has IS. You've got to decide what's more important to you.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

RMC33

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 424
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2013, 01:50:52 PM »
Pretty much what Neuro said. I honestly love my 24-70 MKII but still use my 50 1.4 quite a bit.

Menace

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1313
  • New Zealand
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2013, 07:04:35 PM »
Personally, I'd get the 24-70 2.8 II over the primes - a constant aperture and L built quality etc  :D.

You'll gain at the wide end and lose at the long end compared to the primes so only you can decide if that will affect your shooting style.

Cheers
1Dx | 5D III
85 1.2L II | 100 2.8 | 400 2.8L IS II 
24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

Mt Spokane Photography

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 8281
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2013, 07:39:19 PM »
I have been using primes, but I just bought a 24-70L MK II.  After I have used it a while, I'll decide on my 35mmL, but I've sold four 50mm's and my 85mm f/1.8 in favor of zooms.
 
 I still have several prime lenses, 15, 17, 35, 100, and 135 I'm not really expecting to sell them. I've kept my 24-105 as well.

Dylan777

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3712
    • View Profile
    • http://dylannguyen.500px.com/home
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2013, 07:55:18 PM »
If you shooting with FF, it is almost a no brainer to take 24-70 II over 3 non-L primes
« Last Edit: May 14, 2013, 10:09:26 PM by Dylan777 »
Body: 1DX -- 5D III
Zoom: 24-70L II -- 70-200L f2.8 IS II
Prime: 40mm -- 85L II -- 135L -- 400L f2.8 IS II

Random Orbits

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2013, 09:31:08 PM »
Get the 24-70 II first, and if you need something faster later at a particular focal length, then supplement the zoom with a prime.  Plus it's always easier to get the less expensive items piecemeal later.   ::)

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2013, 09:31:08 PM »

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2622
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2013, 09:35:45 PM »

tron

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1787
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2013, 09:42:02 PM »
If you shooting with FF, it is almost a no brainer to take 24-70 II over 3 non-L primes
+1

pwp

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1458
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2013, 09:52:26 PM »
I feel like I'm repeating myself a bit with this reply, but the new 24-70 f/2.8II is so good I've sold my EF 24 f/1.4II and my Sigma 50 f/1.4 and if I had a 35mm prime that would have been sold too. The new zoom is so good my primes were gathering dust. Get the zoom.

-PW

Dylan777

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3712
    • View Profile
    • http://dylannguyen.500px.com/home
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2013, 10:13:27 PM »
I feel like I'm repeating myself a bit with this reply, but the new 24-70 f/2.8II is so good I've sold my EF 24 f/1.4II and my Sigma 50 f/1.4 and if I had a 35mm prime that would have been sold too. The new zoom is so good my primes were gathering dust. Get the zoom.

-PW

I do use my 50L here and there, but not often as 24-70 II & 70-200 f2.8 IS II.
Body: 1DX -- 5D III
Zoom: 24-70L II -- 70-200L f2.8 IS II
Prime: 40mm -- 85L II -- 135L -- 400L f2.8 IS II

Chosenbydestiny

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 237
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2013, 10:30:32 PM »
Depends on what you already own, and what you want to shoot. I'd be as practical as possible when starting out your set of lenses. A 24-70 II is a very practical focal length for most common use and has prime-like quality and performance. However, for about the same price you could also get a 24-105mm and that same set of primes. I'd personally still get the 24-70 II to avoid lens changes and the great sharpness from 2.8 on down. I can't sell my primes just yet because I shoot a lot of indoor events with moving subjects, but I'm going to add the 24-70 II very soon.
Nikon electric fan, gas stove, and slippers. Canon Elan 7, 1D Mark III, 5D mark III, and 2x6D. Canon 24mm Samyang/Rokinon, 85L, 135L, and many other lenses. 2x Canon 580ex II, third party speedlites, studio strobes

TM

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2013, 10:56:50 PM »
If you shooting with FF, it is almost a no brainer to take 24-70 II over 3 non-L primes

Agree with Dylan777. 3 non L primes will not equal the 24-70 II in any way. Get the zoom first, then some L primes as needed. Happy shooting.
Canon 5DIII, 5DII,  24mm TS-E II L, Sigma 35mm ƒ1.4, 50mm ƒ1.4, 85mm ƒ1.2 L II, 100mm ƒ2.8 micro, 200mm ƒ2.0 L IS, 16-35 ƒ2.8 L II, 24-70 ƒ2.8 L II, 24-105m ƒ4, 70-200 ƒ2.8 L II, 3x 580exII

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2013, 10:56:50 PM »

scottkinfw

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 704
    • View Profile
    • kasden.smug.com
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2013, 11:09:54 PM »
One lens vs. three.  Something to consider for weight, and also in the field when you may need to change in dusty conditions.  Also, during lens changes, may miss a shot.

sek

Hi,
I was thinking of buying the 24-70mm ver 2 and it around 90K CMPI. With that amount of money, I can already buy 3 prime lens (non-L).
I want to know how others think, will you go for the ver 2 or 3 prime lens w/c are sharper and faster?

Prime Lens:
EF 35mm F2 IS USM
EF 50mm F1.4 USM
EF 100mm F2 USM

vs.
EF 24-70mm F2.8 USM ver 2

thanks
sek Cameras: 5D III, 5D II, EOS M  Lenses:  24-70 2.8 II IS, 24-105 f4L, 70-200 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, EF 300 f4L IS, EF 400 5.6L, 300 2.8 IS II, Samyang 14 mm 2.8 Flashes: 580 EX II600EX-RT X 2, ST-E3-RT
Plus lots of stuff that just didn't work for me

samueljay

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 127
  • 5D Mk III
    • View Profile
Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2013, 11:51:20 PM »
Get the 24-70mm Mk II, I haven't used any of my primes since I got it, it's sharper than all of them, and a hell of a lot more versatile! And my primes are L lenses too.
Gear: 5D Mk III <> 70-200mm ƒ/2.8L IS II USM <> 50mm ƒ/1.2L USM <> 8-15mm ƒ/4L  USM <>  100mm ƒ/2.8L  Macro IS USM <> 40mm ƒ/2.8 <> 24-70mm ƒ/2.8L II USM

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF 24-70mm F2.8 L ver 2 or 3 Prime Lens
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2013, 11:51:20 PM »