Having performed many damage and durability tests in my lab, I will say that NASA would have demanded my resignation if I pulled a "Scientific Test" like that. For them to call it scientific is a affront to engineers and scientists.
The first rule of a test is that it be repeatable so that a person anywhere can do the same test and have the same results. There is no way this test is repeatable.
Its just a stunt, not a test.
True. I wonder if SquareTrade will change the insurance costs for Canon cameras after this 'scientific test'
16-35L, 24-70L II, 70-200L II, 100-400L, 50L, 85L II, 135L, 24TSE, 40, 100 macro, 600RT x 4
I have more photo gear than I need. The blame lies squarely with Canonrumors