List of rumored lenses

[swrightgfx]

I'm interested in all the rumored normal lenses:
• 40mm pancake
• 45mm TS-E II
• 50mm 1.2 II
• 60mm Macro
Does anyone have an idea when they'll be available?

I would be interested too if we had a Canon dSLR the size of an old film AE or smaller. Unfortunately we'd need wafer-thin components first.

[IIIHobbs]

With the upcoming 200-400 F4 w/1.4x, how likely would it be for Canon to manufacture a variant of the 200-400 f4 without the 1.4x as an alternative?! This lens could be offered at a much lower price point than the 200-400 w/ 1.4x, but likely well above what the current 100-400 is going for (guess $5k). Looking at the L Series offerings, a 200-400 (non 1.4x) would fit well in the current line of super-telephoto zooms and primes.

[Jerome M]

For those in search for a new camera or a lens, here is the latest update in my Excel Chart (Major update with the old Minolta Cameras, and discontinued Canon Lenses)
http://www.photoexposition.fr/2012/05/15/update-excel-sheet/

[Razor2012]

I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap.  There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice.

[briansquibb]

I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap.  There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice.

16-35 on ff is as wide as the much praised 10-22 ef-s thing

[Razor2012]

I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap.  There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice.

16-35 on ff is as wide as the much praised 10-22 ef-s thing

True.  Canon needs their own 'Holy Trinity'.

[wickidwombat]

i think they should make a 35-85 f2L to fill the gap it would fit in perfectly with the 16-35

[pwp]

i think they should make a 35-85 f2L to fill the gap it would fit in perfectly with the 16-35

Great idea. But think big WW! L28-105 f/2is ? Hang the expense...

PW

[lonebear]

i think they should make a 35-85 f2L to fill the gap it would fit in perfectly with the 16-35

If IQ matches primes, I would like to get one, even it's 1k above 24-70 II.

[briansquibb]

Great idea. But think big WW! L28-105 f/2is ? Hang the expense...

Every wedding photographer would buy one .... or at least, lust after one

Add a 100-200 f/2 for the second body ....

[Birdshooter]

I would rather have a 10-600 f/2 perfectly alligned for an APS-C, weighing not more than 500 gram, which has perfect image quality, no vingetting or CA at all, fully sharp wide open, and is delivered as a kit lens.

Sold seperately for under $1000.

Likelyness it is going to happen? About the same as other suggestions made here 

[Daniel Flather]

ef 20mm f2 L, anyone?

[untitled10]

ef 20mm f2 L, anyone?

If this really were a lens I would be fist in line, getting a fast wide is essential in gig photography, a little wider than 24 would be unbeatable.

[Daniel Flather]

ef 20mm f2 L, anyone?

If this really were a lens I would be fist in line, getting a fast wide is essential in gig photography, a little wider than 24 would be unbeatable.

Yes, the ef 20mm f1.8L.  Sigma has a version, so we know it's possible. 

[aznable]

I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap.  There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice.

16-35 on ff is as wide as the much praised 10-22 ef-s thing

True.  Canon needs their own 'Holy Trinity'.

holy trinity....

i have some nikon friends that use this