April 24, 2018, 05:12:52 AM

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style  (Read 15894 times)

RAWShooter126

  • PowerShot G7 X Mark II
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2013, 09:45:16 AM »
Canon Video-X Picture style test v1
My test efforts from today. I've indicated what settings I've used and equipment. Some short takes at the start but I think it can serve it's purpose enough.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2013, 09:47:09 AM by RAWShooter126 »
Logged
7D, 5D3, 17-40, LEE's, Nifty 1.8, Siggy 18-50 2.8-4.5, Siggy 10-20 4-5.6, Tamron 70-200 2.8

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2013, 09:45:16 AM »

ddashti

  • EOS Rebel T7i
  • ****
  • Posts: 144
Re: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2013, 10:42:52 PM »
There's definitely a difference in video with a big dynamic range.
I guess there's no harm in giving it a try.
Logged

that1guyy

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 249
Re: Canon Creates Video Camera X-Series Look Picture Style
« Reply #17 on: May 19, 2013, 10:34:11 PM »
I think I'll stick with cinestyle.
Logged

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • **********
  • Posts: 6316
  • Canon Pride.
    • Der Tierfotograf
New official Canon picture style
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2013, 05:55:45 AM »
Canon is busy on surprising fronts, and this really might be of use to videoshooters (if you don't shoot raw with magic lantern) or jpeg still shooters (in raw you can apply the style later). Does anyone know how to import these custom picture styles into Lightroom so they can applied to raw shots?

"Image characteristics similar to images shot with Canon’s professional digital video camera (X series) and contrast is softer than Standard in Picture style" ... http://www.canon.co.jp/imaging/picturestyle/file/videocamera.html
Logged

canon rumors FORUM

New official Canon picture style
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2013, 05:55:45 AM »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »