September 21, 2014, 06:35:50 PM

Author Topic: Deep Sky Astrophotography  (Read 5668 times)

niteclicks

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #30 on: July 16, 2014, 04:20:54 PM »
 Thanks Jrista for starting this thread it made finally get started setting my stuff back up. I haven't set my mount up in 4 years, moved and a permanent setup has always been on the to do list (but at the bottom). The long 4th weekend gave me time to unpack and setup temporally to tryout were I might want a permanent mounting. This is a wide field (about 75% crop) of the area around the Trfid and Lagoon nebulae. This is about the southern edge of my usable sky were I have it now. 84 frames at 800 iso, 30sec , 300 2.8l is , 5DIII, on an Atlus EQ-G processed with Images Plus. Alignment needs work but it has mostly been cloudy since.
   

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #30 on: July 16, 2014, 04:20:54 PM »

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3045
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #31 on: July 16, 2014, 05:30:07 PM »
Very nice shot niteclicks.

Guys, I'm really impressed by your pictures.


niteclicks

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #32 on: July 16, 2014, 05:48:38 PM »
Thanks Click, I really enjoyed getting out to take this.

traingineer

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #33 on: July 16, 2014, 08:02:25 PM »
Thanks Jrista for starting this thread it made finally get started setting my stuff back up. I haven't set my mount up in 4 years, moved and a permanent setup has always been on the to do list (but at the bottom). The long 4th weekend gave me time to unpack and setup temporally to tryout were I might want a permanent mounting. This is a wide field (about 75% crop) of the area around the Trfid and Lagoon nebulae. This is about the southern edge of my usable sky were I have it now. 84 frames at 800 iso, 30sec , 300 2.8l is , 5DIII, on an Atlus EQ-G processed with Images Plus. Alignment needs work but it has mostly been cloudy since.
 

Fantastic image, niteclicks!  :D
7D | 24-70mm F2.8 I | 50mm F1.8 II | Sigma 105mm F2.8 OS

niteclicks

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #34 on: July 17, 2014, 03:07:09 PM »
 Thanks traingineer,
           I have alot of projects planed for this combo ( 5DIII and 300) , My favoite night sky is now though January.

jrista

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4563
  • POTATO
    • View Profile
    • Nature Photography
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #35 on: August 31, 2014, 01:44:55 AM »
Thanks Jrista for starting this thread it made finally get started setting my stuff back up. I haven't set my mount up in 4 years, moved and a permanent setup has always been on the to do list (but at the bottom). The long 4th weekend gave me time to unpack and setup temporally to tryout were I might want a permanent mounting. This is a wide field (about 75% crop) of the area around the Trfid and Lagoon nebulae. This is about the southern edge of my usable sky were I have it now. 84 frames at 800 iso, 30sec , 300 2.8l is , 5DIII, on an Atlus EQ-G processed with Images Plus. Alignment needs work but it has mostly been cloudy since.
 

You are welcome! I'm glad your participating. Your image is excellent! I've tried to image that target a couple times myself, but my view of the southern sky from my back yard is nearly completely blocked, and I have never been able to get the necessary subs. Your detail and color are great for 30-second subs, too! The f/2.8 aperture must be a DREAM! :D



Here is one of my latest. This time, it's Crescent nebula...also, as you might have guessed, in Cygnus. Cygnus is moving along pretty early on in the night now, crossing the meridian by about 11pm now, so unless I can figure out how to get some good imaging time on Tulip and/or Propeller nebulas (both also in the Cygnus molecular clouds), I may switch to a different target soon.

This image took a LOT of work. I've had to fight some technical issues with my tracking, which was actually caused by a few different things combined into one hellish problem. I also had persistent weather (it's been a COLD summer...temperatures are often in the 70's or below for days at a time, even as long as a week once...when usually we have temperatures in the mid to high 90's with more than a handful of days over 100), which has cut out a LOT of sky time.

Anyway, persistence finally paid off, allowing me to image Crescent Nebula, which itself is pretty well known...but also pull in a lot of the background nebulosity detail from the extensive molecular cloud in the Cygnus region of one of our galactic arms:



The Crescent itself is quite complex, and actually has a very faint outer shell of mostly oxygen-based gasses that glows a faint blue (usually too dim for a DSLR to see, and generally requires some deep OIII narrow band exposure to bring it out...but I managed to reveal a little bit of it here):



Processed with PixInsight and Photoshop CC+Carboni's Astronomy Actions. See the full size version here:

My Photography
Current Gear: Canon 5D III | Canon 7D | Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II | EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS | EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L | EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 50mm f/1.4
New Gear List: SBIG STT-8300M | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L II

kkelis

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2014, 05:28:33 AM »
Dont know if you can call this deep sky astrophoto but here is my version of andromeda
Untracked/unguided 5sec single shot. 200mm f/2.8 iso 6400

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2014, 05:28:33 AM »

Don Haines

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3202
  • Posting cat pictures on the internet since 1986
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #37 on: August 31, 2014, 08:05:56 AM »
Dont know if you can call this deep sky astrophoto but here is my version of andromeda
Untracked/unguided 5sec single shot. 200mm f/2.8 iso 6400
Nice... Proof that you don't need insane amounts of gear to get started....
The best camera is the one in your hands

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3045
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2014, 08:11:12 AM »
Dont know if you can call this deep sky astrophoto but here is my version of andromeda
Untracked/unguided 5sec single shot. 200mm f/2.8 iso 6400
Nice... Proof that you don't need insane amounts of gear to get started....

+1

Well done kkelis.

jrista

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4563
  • POTATO
    • View Profile
    • Nature Photography
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #39 on: September 01, 2014, 09:31:16 PM »
Dont know if you can call this deep sky astrophoto but here is my version of andromeda
Untracked/unguided 5sec single shot. 200mm f/2.8 iso 6400

Definitely deep sky. Nice results for a single shot. Especially only FIVE SECONDS! :D Well done.
My Photography
Current Gear: Canon 5D III | Canon 7D | Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II | EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS | EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L | EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 50mm f/1.4
New Gear List: SBIG STT-8300M | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L II

jrista

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4563
  • POTATO
    • View Profile
    • Nature Photography
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #40 on: September 03, 2014, 10:07:02 PM »
Elephant Trunk Nebula

Managed to rip this one out relatively quickly, compared to how long it usually takes me. Thanks to a several-day break in the weather, I imaged all night for three nights in a row, gathered 130 subs, and integrated 116 of them (nearly 10 hours of exposure time).



My deepest exposure yet, by a long shot. Elephant Trunk is a very faint nebula, compared to most of the ones I've been imaging lately. So it needed more exposure time than normal (I usually get 30-50 subs, maybe 4-5 hours, sometimes a little more than that.) I'm pretty happy at how the dust lanes came out...I usually barely get any of that.

Full size:





I posted a blog on all my Cygnus images from this summer, including some close-up crops of interesting regions:

http://jonrista.com/2014/09/03/the-cygnus-molecular-clouds/
« Last Edit: September 03, 2014, 10:11:43 PM by jrista »
My Photography
Current Gear: Canon 5D III | Canon 7D | Canon EF 600mm f/4 L IS II | EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS | EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L | EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 50mm f/1.4
New Gear List: SBIG STT-8300M | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L II

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3045
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #41 on: September 04, 2014, 05:55:05 AM »
Awesome shot Jon. Nice work.

traingineer

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #42 on: September 04, 2014, 10:18:16 PM »
Elephant Trunk Nebula

Managed to rip this one out relatively quickly, compared to how long it usually takes me. Thanks to a several-day break in the weather, I imaged all night for three nights in a row, gathered 130 subs, and integrated 116 of them (nearly 10 hours of exposure time).



My deepest exposure yet, by a long shot. Elephant Trunk is a very faint nebula, compared to most of the ones I've been imaging lately. So it needed more exposure time than normal (I usually get 30-50 subs, maybe 4-5 hours, sometimes a little more than that.) I'm pretty happy at how the dust lanes came out...I usually barely get any of that.

Full size:





I posted a blog on all my Cygnus images from this summer, including some close-up crops of interesting regions:

http://jonrista.com/2014/09/03/the-cygnus-molecular-clouds/

Another fantabulous image!  ;)
7D | 24-70mm F2.8 I | 50mm F1.8 II | Sigma 105mm F2.8 OS

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Deep Sky Astrophotography
« Reply #42 on: September 04, 2014, 10:18:16 PM »