would "poo" be more appropriate? either way, its quite horrible, if you sum up the internet regarding that topic. thats why im holding up for a 7d2, if there will be any news about it before october. otherwise, im going for 1d4, no questions asked
7D and indoor shots without flash? the truth? sh*t, especially compared to 5DIII/6D
A good point to consider (although 'sh*t' is a bit strong imho).
Summing up the internet usually leads to strong or even extreme opinions. In the real world a camera that was good yesterday still isn't bad today
I agree with Zv, with a little care the 7D can be good up to ISO 3200.
Have any of you nay sayers actually used a 7D??
Yes, as you can see in my signature. I'm very happy with the 7D and 5D MkII combo. The 7D is surprisingly good even at high iso's although the 5DII is obviously my camera of choice when the light gets dim. Such is the luxury of owning both these bodies, as you know
Attached file is an example of really challenging lighting conditions with the 7D at iso 3200. Sharpness could be better but this was taken with my old 70-200 f/2.8 IS at f/4.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2013, 07:34:38 AM by mrsfotografie »
5D3, 5D2, Sony α6000, G16 | EF: SY14/2.8, V20/3.5, 28/2.8 IS, Ʃ35/1.4, 50/1.8, Ʃ50/1.4 EX, 100/2.8L IS Macro, 16-35/4L IS, 24-105/4L IS, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 2.0x III, 70-300L IS, T28-300 Di VC PZD, Ʃ150-600 DG OS HSM S | E: SY12/2, 35/1.8 OSS, 16-70 ZA OSS, 55-210 OSS, SY300/6.3 ED UMC CS