September 20, 2014, 02:37:21 PM

Author Topic: EF-M mount lenses  (Read 5303 times)

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1670
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
EF-M mount lenses
« on: July 22, 2013, 05:25:48 PM »
So, just got my EOS-M in the mail w/22mm lens, but I was curious if any 3rd parties have announced/released lenses for the EF-M mount. I know there's the 18-55 and new 11-22 that just came out, but those are Canon lenses. I'm curious if anyone else is putting anything on this mount without the need for an adapter.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

canon rumors FORUM

EF-M mount lenses
« on: July 22, 2013, 05:25:48 PM »

paul13walnut5

  • Guest
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2013, 05:52:35 PM »
Samyang have so far commited with thei
R forthcoming 16mm f2.0 and 300mm mirror lens.

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1670
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2013, 07:26:07 PM »
Samyang have so far commited with thei
R forthcoming 16mm f2.0 and 300mm mirror lens.

Ohh...they have a 16mm f/2.0? Nice. Not sure how I feel about a mirror 300mm, but always nice to see people trying out different things.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

brad-man

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 715
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2013, 07:05:45 PM »
I wrote to Sigma:

Hello Brad,
                We have no plans at this time to support the EOS-M mount.

Yours Truly,
Paul Pizzano
Sigma Corporation of America



Bummer. I was hoping for at least their existing 30/60mm F2.8 DN/A mirrorless lenses, but oh well...


 


Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1670
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2013, 07:57:39 PM »
I wrote to Sigma:

Hello Brad,
                We have no plans at this time to support the EOS-M mount.

Yours Truly,
Paul Pizzano
Sigma Corporation of America



Bummer. I was hoping for at least their existing 30/60mm F2.8 DN/A mirrorless lenses, but oh well...

:(   Yea, it'd be nice to have another option for AF lenses.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

spinworkxroy

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2013, 04:59:26 AM »
I highly doubt any 3rd party company will develop M lenses since this mount is only used by 1 camera so far and it's not very popular to begin with. Maybe in the future with newer models and more people adapting to it they will…
Furthermore, the EF adapter works pretty well and isn't that big..so..you can always just use the adapter with EF-S lenses instead that are cheaper than EF.
I also believe the M isn't everyone's one and only camera..many M owners also own DSLRs from Canon…so personally even for me, i wouldn't want to buy M lenses when i have EF lenses that will work with both systems..
The EOS M isn't good enough yet to be the one camera to own..unlike owners of Fuji or Sony where they would sell all the DSLR gears and move to those CSC cameras and their only camera.

paul13walnut5

  • Guest
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2013, 05:20:33 AM »
I agree with almost everything you say, with two observations to make

I highly doubt any 3rd party company will develop M lenses since this mount is only used by 1 camera so far

Samyang have. As discussed earlier in the thread.

..unlike owners of Fuji or Sony where they would sell all the DSLR gears and move to those CSC cameras and their only camera.

I'm sure cases exist where people have done this, but in my opinion anybody who does this must only have very specific needs that these cameras exactly satisfy.  For me a camera system is nothing without a strong system.  I haven't seen the exotic telephotos for NEX (I know you can adapt alpha and legacy MAF lenses) and certainly not for Fuji.

My take, as with all CSC's, is that they are only really compact with a pancake.  I'm happy with running 3 camera bodies, as each has a strength for a particular purpose.  Adaptability is the key for me, but the M is never going to be my perfect camera, in the same way that my 7D is never going to be my perfect camera.  But combined along with the T3i (mainly for video) I have a system that, for me, is pretty near to perfect.

Would I spend a lot of money on an EF-m lens?  Probably not, as I would rather buy an EF / EF-s lens and keep my options open.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2013, 05:20:33 AM »

brad-man

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 715
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2013, 07:44:18 AM »
I agree with all of you. Like many others, I would not have purchased the M without the drastically reduced price. It will still serve as a backup. However, I really like the camera and the 22mm. I have the zoom and it is a nice lens, but it is a little too large for my taste. I prefer to carry my M in my cargo pants pocket, and would like one or two more lenses that will also travel in my other pockets. I don't believe a zoom lens will ever qualify and I really want faster lenses anyway. In all honesty, I'd be thrilled with just a 35-40mm f/2.2. I do have the shorty 40, but with the adapter, it's still a little large. Hopefully, when the newer version(s) are released the video crowd will jump on the bandwagon and market share will increase...

Mellonhead

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2013, 09:37:15 AM »
...  The EOS M isn't good enough yet to be the one camera to own... 

Yes it is.  I ditched my trusty 30D for the EOS-M and have not regretted it. You do not need a 1D, 5D etc... in order to get sharp portraits, landscapes and sports shots. Yes, it has some limitations, but they're easy to work around. It's more versatile than any point-and-shoot, and has  picture quality to rival some new DSLR's, and a lot of older DSLR's.

For professionals, there's no replacement for a pro-level DSLR, but for the rest of us....

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1670
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2013, 12:38:45 PM »
Furthermore, the EF adapter works pretty well and isn't that big..so..you can always just use the adapter with EF-S lenses instead that are cheaper than EF.

Sure, the adapter isn't that big, but the lenses are a lot bigger than they _need_ to be for the EOS-M. Of course, a 500mm lens is a 500mm lens. Hard to get around that except with DO, and that isn't working great yet.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

Bruce Photography

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 201
  • Landscapes, 5DX,7D,60D,EOSM,D800/E,D810,D7100
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2013, 01:40:37 PM »
My price reduced EOS-M is coming tomorrow with the 18-55 IS lens.  Would someone comment on image quality between the 22 and the lens I will be getting?  I decided that the 22 will probably be available for some time even if Canon discontinues the camera so I could buy it later.  I did order the adapter after holding my breath for such an expensive extension tube.  Value wise I'm sure that I'll have my fun putting on my EF and EF-S lenses on the little guy but I wanted to see how the screen worked outside first before I put any more money in it.  I have just bought the latest hoodman loupe with the cinema strap for my big camera (strap is adjustable).  They may be my viewfinder for this camera once you set all the settings with the touch screen (solves my sunlight problem).  Anyway I'm expecting fun.

sjprg

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • 1DSIII
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2013, 03:31:24 PM »
I got a brand new EOS-M body only off of Ebay for $270.00 free shipping and a genuine Canon adapter for $75.00 and $25.00 for expedited shipping from China. Works great on my Canon 28-300 with a 2XTC.

FunPhotons

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2013, 05:18:12 PM »
My price reduced EOS-M is coming tomorrow with the 18-55 IS lens.  Would someone comment on image quality between the 22 and the lens I will be getting?

They're both good. I don't pixel peep. Got the 11-22 on the way.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2013, 05:18:12 PM »

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1670
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2013, 06:07:43 PM »
My price reduced EOS-M is coming tomorrow with the 18-55 IS lens.  Would someone comment on image quality between the 22 and the lens I will be getting?

They're both good. I don't pixel peep. Got the 11-22 on the way.

The reason I didn't get the 18-55 is it's f/3.5-5.6. If it'd be f/2.8 throughout the focal range I'd definitely have gone with it, even if it was $50 or $100 more. f/2.0 on the 22mm is great, but I'd accept a bit higher cost and small increase in size for a good normal f/2.8 zoom.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

FunPhotons

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
    • View Profile
Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2013, 06:28:12 PM »
My price reduced EOS-M is coming tomorrow with the 18-55 IS lens.  Would someone comment on image quality between the 22 and the lens I will be getting?

They're both good. I don't pixel peep. Got the 11-22 on the way.

The reason I didn't get the 18-55 is it's f/3.5-5.6. If it'd be f/2.8 throughout the focal range I'd definitely have gone with it, even if it was $50 or $100 more. f/2.0 on the 22mm is great, but I'd accept a bit higher cost and small increase in size for a good normal f/2.8 zoom.

Yeah, at 2.8 it would probably be more expensive than that and bigger?

I'm fine with the zoom, good walkabout lens. I also like the f/2 of the prime.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: EF-M mount lenses
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2013, 06:28:12 PM »