July 22, 2017, 05:17:16 AM

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sidekick or Full Wimberly  (Read 2037 times)

CellCyclist

  • Canonflex
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« on: July 30, 2013, 01:48:02 PM »
Hi Guys,

I recently purchased a used 400 F4.0 DO and I am now looking for an suited Gimbal head. I have already decided that I want a Wimberly, but I m not sure wether I should get the Sidekick or should directly get the full version.

I already own an Markins Q20, so the Sidekick would not burn a hole in my pocket. On the other side its already 40% of the price for the full Version.

Has anybody experience with using a 400 mm DO on a sidekick? Does it balance reasonably well?

Thanks for the help

Logged

canon rumors FORUM

Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« on: July 30, 2013, 01:48:02 PM »

East Wind Photography

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1415
  • EWP
Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2013, 03:34:11 PM »
Full wimberly.  It is more stable, provides better support, and you will upgrade to the full wimberly anyway.  So just bite it and get what you really want in the first place.  :)
Logged

Click

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • **********
  • Posts: 8808
Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2013, 03:35:02 PM »
+1 Wimberly.
Logged

Jim K

  • EOS M3
  • ****
  • Posts: 158
Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2013, 04:16:49 PM »
I don't have experience with the equipment to answer your question. But I am very happy with the full version II for my 500 f/4L IS. Your setup is quite a bit lighter so it may work on a sidekick  :-\
Logged
EOS: 7D (2, 1 gripped), 50D gripped, 580EX II + CP-E4
EF: 500 f/4L IS, 100-400 L IS, 70-200 f/4L IS, 28-135 IS, 1.4x TC II, EF-S: 15-85 IS, 10-22
5D3, 17-40 L, 24-105 L, 24mm TS-E II.  S100 p&s

scottkinfw

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1230
  • Wildlife photography is my passion
    • www.kasden.smug.com
Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2013, 06:42:55 PM »
Ditto with the above.

I also don't have your exact setup, but do have some heavy glass and the WH-200.  It works great for all my short and long lenses.  I am very happy with it.  I find that it is an excellent quality head for a good price.

sek
Logged
Cameras: 1DXII,5D III, 5D II.  Lenses    24-70 2.8L II IS, 70-200 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, EF 400 5.6L, 300 2.8 IS II, Samyang 14 mm 2.8.   Flashes: 600EX-RT X 2, ST-E3-RT, 580 EX II.
Plus lots of stuff that just didn't work for me

BrettS

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2013, 07:42:52 PM »
Ditto on all the above.

I have a Markins Q-Ball M-10 but opted for the Wimberley WH-200 when I picked up my 500 F/4L II.
Logged

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sidekick or Full Wimberly
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2013, 07:42:52 PM »
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »